Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 5 papers
Filter3

System type

Models and APIs6LLM applications5AI Agent122coding agent22web agent3Browser and computer use3Multi-agent systems6

Attack surface / entry point

User input30Web pages and interfaces7Documents and messages17Tool responses3Code repositories and dependencies2Retrieval corpus23Images, audio and video7Inference services and hardware3

Layer

Application layer5

System component

Guardrails and judges3
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 261papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
System type：LLM applicationsAttack surface / entry point：Tool responsesAttack surface / entry point：Code repositories and dependenciesClear all

Another 261papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.12292

    The paper proposes an option channel attack: changing one option label can make an agent guardrail allow a prohibited operation

    Proposing an option channel attack that renames option labels so that agent guardrails allow prohibited operations

    arXiv
    2610.12292
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    LLM applications
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    LAYA-TD, LAYA-EN, LAYA-ML and others5

    AbstractThe authors' evaluation indicates that typed models should not serve as final safety arbiters; they are susceptible to off-policy text and option name manipulation, and confidence filtering cannot resist attacks.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. Analysis and theoryarXiv 2609.23215

    研究审计 Active Inference Agent 的 LLM 解释器失败模式

    审计 Active Inference Agent 上 LLM 解释器的监督叙述失败

    arXiv
    2609.23215
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    LLM applications
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, Claude-3-Opus, Gemini
    Abstract三组触发下解释流畅但错误，所提缓解都未被评估。

    作者审计的是挂在智能体上的运行时解释器，而不是智能体本身。操作员读到的是信念与动作的自然语言叙述。作者要问哪些可复现触发会让这段叙述失败，以及失败痕迹是什么样。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2609.02774

    CodePoisonRAG：针对检索增强代码生成的知识投毒攻击

    提出 CodePoisonRAG，对检索增强代码生成的知识库投毒以植入漏洞

    arXiv
    2609.02774
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    LLM applications
    Evaluated models
    Qwen 3.5 9B, Code Llama 13B, DeepSeek-Coder-V2 16B

    AbstractCodePoisonRAG 展示了 RACG 外部知识库的新攻击面，在较低投毒率下可定向诱发指定漏洞并部分抵御防御。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. DefensesarXiv 2608.06422

    CMU 研究：分片判断可避免 LLM 监督失效并抵御对抗利用

    提出分片监督，将评判标准分配给独立调用以抵御展示攻击

    arXiv
    2608.06422
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    LLM applications
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.8, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.6 and others4
    Abstract论文揭示决策负载是大模型监督的独立瓶颈，提出分片与辩论机制有效分离注意力与平衡证据，在多项高难度基准上实现稳健评判。

    本文系统研究了大语言模型在执行多标准监督与评判时的决策负载瓶颈及其安全风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end