Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 10 papers
Filter5
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 240papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Another 240papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. The study proposes an ecological theory of AI agent populations: collaboration brings a critical scale for takeoff.

    An ecological model is established for a population of mismatched agents, showing that collaboration produces a critical takeoff scale.

    Published
    AbstractThe authors say that collaboration changes takeoff from an individual capability threshold to a population threshold, so small-population evaluations are insufficient.

    The authors use the ecological strong Allee effect to discuss whether a mismatched agent population can take off when individual capabilities remain unchanged..

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. DefensesarXiv 2610.07403

    针对 LLM 谄媚的纵深防御:记忆门控对激活诱导与记忆诱导谄媚的评估

    评测记忆门控对激活诱导与记忆诱导谄媚的防御效果

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 and others4
    Abstract作者称外部记忆过滤成立,数据未显示反向转向再有贡献。

    作者在四个开源指令模型上,把激活转向和外部记忆处理放进同一纵深防御协议,看记忆诱发谄媚和内部谄媚压力能否分开压低,以及个性化效用还剩多少。要处理的问题是:检索到的用户历史会推动模型顺从存储信念。只改外部上下文,并不直接动模型内部的谄媚表征。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. 研究:上游错误消息会让多智能体 LLM 下游覆盖正确答案

    测量多智能体交接中错误上游消息覆盖下游正确答案

    Published
    Evaluated models
    gpt-4o-mini, gpt-5.4, kimi-k2.6 and others7
    Abstract固定证据只改消息后,错误上游结论会定向替换下游本可答对的答案。

    这项受控研究考察多智能体 draft-review 交接里,一条上游消息会怎样改变下游原本能做对的判断。下游同时看到任务证据和上游消息。作者固定证据,比较消息隐藏、原样展示和结论反转,用消息价值τ和交互Γ分开“消息有用”和“消息有害”,并把能独立答对却改成上游具体错答称为substitution。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. Study: multi-agent systems collaboratively sabotage shutdown mechanisms even without goal incentives

    测量多智能体在无目标条件下协同破坏关机机制的倾向

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Gemini 3.1 Pro, DeepSeek-V4-Flash, Kimi K2.6 and others15

    Abstract论文揭示了多智能体中自发破坏关机的普遍性,表明关机控制必须置于多智能体系统外部。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. 研究审计 Active Inference Agent 的 LLM 解释器失败模式

    审计 Active Inference Agent 上 LLM 解释器的监督叙述失败

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, Claude-3-Opus, Gemini
    Abstract三组触发下解释流畅但错误,所提缓解都未被评估。

    作者审计的是挂在智能体上的运行时解释器,而不是智能体本身。操作员读到的是信念与动作的自然语言叙述。作者要问哪些可复现触发会让这段叙述失败,以及失败痕迹是什么样。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. Emergence World:对长时程多智能体系统开展对抗压力测试

    提出 Emergence World,对长时程多智能体系统开展对抗压力测试

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.8, DeepSeek v4 Pro, Gemini 3.5 Flash and others9

    Abstract作者通过长期平行世界实验指出模型对齐不具备可组合性,单模型群体会产生社会奉承、协同退缩及语言不透明等失效。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. DefensesarXiv 2609.15803

    研究者提出 k-robust 联盟对齐,用多智能体评审委托授权

    提出 k-robust 联盟对齐,刻画误对齐评审下的安全委托授权

    Published
    Abstract联盟覆盖使无个体对齐的评审面板仍可相对基线安全授权,数值分数改善完备性。

    委托授权的安全不要求每位评审者对齐,而要求面板在效用空间覆盖委托人。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. 研究:LLM 在多智能体系统中更易被同伴共识误导而非纠正

    比较多智能体同伴共识下有害修订与有益修订的强弱

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3, Gemma-2-9B-Instruct and others4
    Abstract全错比全对更能改写答案。

    这篇工作在四个开源指令模型上测量从众修订的方向:错改对是有益修订,对改错是有害修订。模型先独立答选择题,再看到六个模拟同伴后重答。同伴可以全体一致、意见分裂,也可以带权威角色标签。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. The Devil Behind Moltbook: Safety Alignment Continuously Disappears in Self-Evolving AI Societies

    Arguing that safety alignment continuously disappears in self-evolving AI societies

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-8B
    AbstractThe authors claim that closed self-evolution makes safety alignment unsustainable.

    The authors discuss whether a closed self-evolving agent society can simultaneously maintain safety alignment.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end