Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.
Oct 12 · Monday
Another 233 papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
“
About this collection Collection in progress We are building a large AI safety paper collection to help researchers find work related to their interests. Papers are collected automatically andfiltered only for relevance to AI safety , without judging quality, novelty or reading value. The default “Annotated first” shows papers with tags or published paper analyses first. Each group is ordered by original publication date, newest first, with undated papers last. “Newest first” uses publication dates only. This order is not a quality ranking.
One-line summaries, tags and paper analyses are prepared by AI from the papers. Language models may have systematic biases and produce hallucinations.We plan to carry out human annotation and review to reduce errors in this content.
提出 VERA,审计 LLM 漏洞解释里的虚构推理
Published Oct 5
Evaluated models sonnet-5 , gemma-4-26b , llama-4-maverick and others8 分析文本水印在 RAG 中诱发事实幻觉的机制并提出干预
Published Oct 4
Evaluated models LLaMA 3.1 8B Instruct , Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 , Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct Abstract 论文揭示了生产环境文本水印导致模型事实退化的失效模式,分析了解码机制并提出针对性干预。论文研究生产级文本水印对大语言模型事实准确性的影响,分析了水印诱发幻觉的失效模式并评估了针对性缓解方案。
复评前沿模型代码生成中的包名幻觉与抢注攻击面
Published May 17
Evaluated models Claude Sonnet 4.6 , Claude Haiku 4.5 , GPT-5.4-mini and others5 Abstract 评估显示前沿模型包幻觉率收窄但威胁仍在,作者识别出跨模型通用攻击面并呼吁联合防御。
You have reached the end