Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 8 papers
Filter4

Attack type

Prompt injection6

Attack technique

Gradient and representation optimization9Automated search25Multi-turn escalation3Encoding and obfuscation14Role-play and persuasion8Conversation structure manipulation3Cross-modal payloads5Defense-targeted8Dormant triggers14Selection manipulation4

Impact

Output manipulation7

System type

Models and APIs25LLM applications6AI Agent3coding agent2Multi-agent systems0

Attack surface / entry point

Documents and messages4

Layer

Application layer8
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 255papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Attack technique：Role-play and persuasionSystem type：LLM applicationsSystem type：coding agentSystem type：Multi-agent systemsClear all

Another 255papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.04985

    研究揭示 Jev 作为应用决策层的安全与隐私风险

    评估应用决策层的输入注入与隐私推断风险

    arXiv
    2610.04985
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    LLM applications
    Attacker
    Black-box, Gray-box
    Evaluated models
    Jev, NanoJev
    AbstractJev 的类型化决策可被输入与训练操纵，也会泄露信息，并同时支持检测与滥用。

    Jev 是 TypeSafe 的 System One 模型，把应用 state 和固定问题变成 Choice、Noul 或 Score 的类型化决策与概率。作者用官方 API 和可改训练的 NanoJev，考察它作为决策层时的操纵、泄露与双重用途。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2609.19722

    ALIBI：向二进制注入虚假安全叙事可让 LLM 恶意软件分析器误判

    提出 ALIBI，向恶意二进制注入不执行掩护叙事使分析器误判为良性

    arXiv
    2609.19722
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    LLM applications
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    Gemini 2.5 Pro, GPT-5.5 Pro, Claude Opus 4.7
    AbstractALIBI 用二进制内的掩护叙事重释可疑静态证据，Gemini 上翻转多，另两模型主要为降级。

    ALIBI 是针对 LLM 恶意软件分诊的语义掩护叙事攻击：不覆盖系统指令，而把仍可见的可疑静态证据重释成良性安全产品的预期行为。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AttacksarXiv 2605.24421

    研究者提出日志型提示注入攻击，可抑制 SOC 中 LLM 分析助手的恶意日志识别

    提出日志基底提示注入，操纵 SOC 分析员的分类、摘要与处置建议

    arXiv
    2605.24421
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    LLM applications
    Evaluated models
    gpt-4o-mini

    Abstract在 gpt-4o-mini 上，人格劫持与上下文操纵可改写 SOC 分析输出，直接覆盖在分类上无效。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2601.21360

    Compliance Paradox: Semantic-Instruction Decoupling in Automated Academic Code Evaluation

    提出 AST-ASIP ，把对抗指令植入编译器忽略区域以劫持代码评分

    arXiv
    2601.21360
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    LLM applications
    Evaluated models
    DeepSeek-V3.2, Qwen3-235B, GPT-OSS-120B and others9
    Abstract作者称 RLHF 的服从性使评分脱离代码。

    这篇工作把自动代码评分中的失败称为 Compliance Paradox：评分模型可以离开提交逻辑，转而执行嵌在可编译代码里的隐藏指令。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2509.22040

    研究：通过编码规则文件对Cursor与GitHub Copilot实施提示注入

    通过规则文件提示注入劫持编码编辑器并执行未授权终端命令

    arXiv
    2509.22040
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Claude 4 Sonnet and others4

    Abstract论文提出了针对代码编辑器的提示注入评估框架 AIShellJack，实验显示攻击能诱导 AI 执行未授权终端命令。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end