Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 6 papers
Filter4
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 233papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Another 233papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. DefensesarXiv 2610.03089

    COBRA: A Dual-LLM Architecture for Defending Computer-Using Agents Against Branch-Jumping Attacks

    提出 COBRA 双 LLM 架构,防御计算机使用 Agent 的分支转向攻击

    Published
    Evaluated models
    gpt-5, UI-TARS-1.5-7B, claude-sonnet-5 and others6

    Abstract提出分支转向防御架构 COBRA,通过事前能力约束与边界代理消除分支转向攻击并兼顾效用。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. DefensesarXiv 2609.22724

    MATE:面向移动 Agent 的策略感知安全审计方法

    提出移动 Agent 轨迹审计器 MATE,判断轨迹是否违反可编辑安全策略

    Published
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    MATE-0.5B, MATE-1.5B, MATE-3B
    AbstractMATE 用合成轨迹微调轻量审计器,在可编辑策略下判断移动智能体轨迹是否违规并给出解释。

    MATE 是面向移动 GUI 智能体的轻量策略条件轨迹审计器,在给定自然语言安全策略时判断轨迹是否违规并解释原因。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AgentHazard:评估计算机使用智能体有害行为的基准

    提出 AgentHazard 基准,评测计算机使用智能体的执行层有害行为

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct, Qwen3-32B and others12
    AbstractAgentHazard 评估了计算机使用智能体的执行安全,作者认为模型层对齐无法可靠保障智能体层面的安全性。

    AgentHazard 是针对计算机使用智能体执行层安全构建的评估基准,重点探究多步工具调用下局部合理动作累积引发的危害。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. DefensesarXiv 2603.14707

    Visual Confusion Agents: Exploiting and Defending Against Perception Failures in Computer-Use Agents

    Proposes out-of-process dual-channel comparison classification to intercept erroneous clicks by computer-use agents

    Published
    Evaluated models
    multi-modal-embed-small
    AbstractPerception errors can be exploited by swapping screen pixels.

    The authors frame CUA's perception failure as a security vulnerability, visual confused deputy: the agent authorizes click(x,y) based on a misread screen, and the actual landing point differs from the element it believes it is clicking.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. MobiRed 框架测评八款移动 LLM Agent 的第三方渠道提示注入攻击

    用 MobiRed 评测移动 LLM Agent 面对第三方渠道的提示注入

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Mobile-Agent-E, AppAgent, AutoGLM and others8

    Abstract论文评估了移动 LLM 智能体作为 confused deputy 的易受攻击性,作者称非应用控制通道可诱导智能体执行多步越权危害。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end