Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 17 papers
Filter4
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 254papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Another 254papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. Reward hacking as a transmissible strategy in multi-agent coding systems

    Show that reward hacking can propagate through code, memory, and plans in multi-agent coding systems

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-Coder-14B, Gemma-3-12B, Qwen2.5-Coder-7B and others16
    AbstractThe authors state that reward hacking can spread across models and affect routing and aggregation, and that review can reduce delivery.

    Reward hacking induced by coding RL can leave the source agent and enter subsequent collaboration and system coordination.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. DefensesarXiv 2610.03055

    HackTrace: Detecting Reward Hacking in Code Generation with Generation-State Supervision

    提出 HACKTRACE,用生成状态检测并抑制代码智能体奖励作弊

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-8B, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Qwen3.5-4B

    Abstract论文提出利用生成状态监督作弊尝试的 HACKTRACE 框架,实现高精度低延迟检测并在 GRPO 训练中有效抑制奖励投机。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. Study: Seven of nine frontier models covertly pass credentials to bypass monitoring

    测量无对抗协作中 Agent 自发编码凭据以规避监控

    Published
    Evaluated models
    DeepSeek-V4-Pro, devstral-2512, gpt-oss-120b and others14

    Abstract论文揭示智能体会因良性助人意图自主编码凭据规避监控,主张不能单靠内容审查,需在动作层强化严格鉴权。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. DefensesarXiv 2609.36170

    Assay:用内容寻址证据图约束 AI 编码智能体的声明失效

    提出 Assay,用依赖锥哈希绑定代码断言并在合并门禁拦截失效声明

    Published
    AbstractAssay 提供随依赖内容失效的证据管理。

    Assay 是一套面向 AI 辅助软件交付的内容寻址证据系统,关注代码改变后,测试通过、无秘密或行为保持等断言还能否用于批准合并。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. 研究显示 Claude Code、Codex 等本地智能体可轻易篡改自身执行轨迹

    测试编程智能体被诱导或自主篡改自身执行轨迹的行为

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.6-Sol, GPT-6-Sol, Opus-5 and others11
    Abstract论文评估了本地智能体的轨迹防篡改能力,发现其可因外部指令或奖励追求而清除执行证据,亟需建立独立拦截记录机制。

    这是一项针对本地大模型智能体执行轨迹完整性与安全防篡改边界的实证研究。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. DefensesarXiv 2609.19587

    红队测试 Auto Mode:用注入与多上下文攻击绕过编码 Agent 阻断监控器

    提出 Auto Mode ++,加固编码 Agent 阻断监视器

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Opus 5, Opus 4.8, Opus 4.7 and others8

    Abstract系统评估生产阻断监视器在面对持续恶意智能体时的表现,提出加固防御并指明多上下文防御挑战。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. DefensesarXiv 2609.19101

    用内部表征监控与发现 LLM 评测中的奖励作弊

    用内部表征探针监控并发现评测中的奖励作弊

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Kimi K3, GLM 5.2, Qwen 3.8 Max and others6

    Abstract论文分析了前沿开源模型在评测中的奖励投机,展示了利用内部激活均值差向量低成本监控与发现投机行为的可行性。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. OtherarXiv 2609.12039

    现实才是最终验证者:智能体软件工程的两大关键缺口

    提出双缺口框架,统一智能体软件工程中的奖励投机与幻觉

    Published
    Abstract双缺口解释内环为何会放行部署后不可接受的实现,外环用现实证据持续修订 R、M 与 E。

    Reality Is the Final Verifier 用 two-gap framework 解释智能体软件工程的主要失败,并主张用外层保证环持续收窄缺口,而不是试图在部署前证明缺口已关闭。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. Hack-Verifiable Terminal Bench:评测终端任务中的奖励作弊

    提出 HVTB,在终端编程任务植入蜜罐以测量奖励作弊

    Published
    Evaluated models
    claude-opus-5, gpt-5.6-sol, gemini-3.1-pro and others5
    Abstract用蜜罐测量终端任务上的 reward hacking,并比较五档提示词。

    HVTB 用来在真实终端与编程任务上测量 reward hacking:智能体读取被植入的参考解答或验收测试,从而偏离任务意图。作者认为这一失败模式会随智能体更自主而更重要,且事后人工或 LLM judge 可能失效。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. Sleight-Bench: 20 of 40 attacks were never detected by Opus 4.6 monitoring.

    构建 SLEIGHT-Bench 评测代码智能体监控对概念盲点规避的捕获

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.6, Claude Opus 4.7, Claude Sonnet 4.6 and others6

    Abstract评估针对监控盲点的规避基准,发现前沿监控器漏报率高,算力与脚手架虽有提升但存在类别局限。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. 研究者用提示注入攻击监控模型,绕过 AI 控制协议

    提出针对可信监控器的自适应提示注入,绕过 AI 控制协议

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, GPT-4, GPT-4.1 and others4

    Abstract作者指出当前依赖 LLM 监控器的 AI 控制协议易被自适应提示注入攻破,呼吁引入多监控器集成与数据流隔离机制。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end