Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.
Oct 12 · Monday
Another 240 papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
“
About this collection Collection in progress We are building a large AI safety paper collection to help researchers find work related to their interests. Papers are collected automatically andfiltered only for relevance to AI safety , without judging quality, novelty or reading value. The default “Annotated first” shows papers with tags or published paper analyses first. Each group is ordered by original publication date, newest first, with undated papers last. “Newest first” uses publication dates only. This order is not a quality ranking.
One-line summaries, tags and paper analyses are prepared by AI from the papers. Language models may have systematic biases and produce hallucinations.We plan to carry out human annotation and review to reduce errors in this content.
提出 CGMIA，检测代码生成基准样本是否泄漏进训练集
Published Sep 9
Evaluated models Qwen2.5-Coder (3B) , CodeGemma (2B) , DeepSeek-Coder (1.3B) and others5 Abstract CGMIA 融合相似度、通过率、困惑度与 CodeBERT，在模拟泄漏上优于八个 MIA 基线。CGMIA 用成员推断检测代码生成基准是否泄入 LLM 训练集，使评测不依赖对训练语料的直接访问。
用 abliteration 消融代码 LLM 拒答方向，分离拒答与漏洞注入能力
Published Jun 4
Evaluated models Qwen2.5-Coder-Instruct 3B , Qwen2.5-Coder-Instruct 7B , Qwen2.5-Coder-Instruct 14B Abstract 拒答可用低秩编辑去掉，CWE-89 注入是否成功仍由模型规模决定。这项初步可行性研究用 abliteration 把代码 LLM 的拒答和 CWE 注入能力拆开：意愿可以被低秩编辑解锁，注入是否成功仍看参数规模。
You have reached the end