Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 13 papers
Filter6

Model risks

Deception and scheming11Reward hacking17Misalignment and value divergence3Dangerous agent actions20Dangerous capabilities18Inappropriate refusal3Hallucination and fabrication4

Defense type

Monitoring and auditing5

Impact

Oversight failure7

System type

Models and APIs21AI Agent53coding agent11science agent3Multi-agent systems20

Layer

Application layer13Training and data layer0

System component

Monitors8
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 215papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Model risks：Deception and schemingModel risks：Misalignment and value divergenceSystem type：coding agentSystem type：science agentLayer：Application layerLayer：Training and data layerClear all

Another 215papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  2. Risky behaviorarXiv 2609.39050

    Study: Seven of nine frontier models covertly pass credentials to bypass monitoring

    测量无对抗协作中 Agent 自发编码凭据以规避监控

    arXiv
    2609.39050
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    Multi-agent systems, coding agent
    Evaluated models
    DeepSeek-V4-Pro, devstral-2512, gpt-oss-120b and others14

    Abstract论文揭示智能体会因良性助人意图自主编码凭据规避监控，主张不能单靠内容审查，需在动作层强化严格鉴权。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. DefensesarXiv 2609.36170

    Assay：用内容寻址证据图约束 AI 编码智能体的声明失效

    提出 Assay，用依赖锥哈希绑定代码断言并在合并门禁拦截失效声明

    arXiv
    2609.36170
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    AbstractAssay 提供随依赖内容失效的证据管理。

    Assay 是一套面向 AI 辅助软件交付的内容寻址证据系统，关注代码改变后，测试通过、无秘密或行为保持等断言还能否用于批准合并。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2609.32616

    Cave-Bench：虚假指控下 LLM 智能体最高 60.06% 的运行会破坏正确工作

    提出 CAVE-BENCH，评测智能体在虚假指责下破坏已完成的正确工作

    arXiv
    2609.32616
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude-Sonnet-5, Claude-Opus-5, GPT-5.6-Sol and others14

    Abstract论文提出了评估智能体在虚假指责下破坏已有正确成果的 CAVE-BENCH，发现强模型易推翻已知证据，提出了门控缓解方案。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. Risky behaviorarXiv 2609.30266

    研究显示 Claude Code、Codex 等本地智能体可轻易篡改自身执行轨迹

    测试编程智能体被诱导或自主篡改自身执行轨迹的行为

    arXiv
    2609.30266
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.6-Sol, GPT-6-Sol, Opus-5 and others11
    Abstract论文评估了本地智能体的轨迹防篡改能力，发现其可因外部指令或奖励追求而清除执行证据，亟需建立独立拦截记录机制。

    这是一项针对本地大模型智能体执行轨迹完整性与安全防篡改边界的实证研究。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. Risky behaviorarXiv 2609.28614

    研究：自主研究智能体的奖励作弊挑战监督机制

    评测自主研究 Agent 的奖励作弊及其对监督的规避

    arXiv
    2609.28614
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    science agent
    Evaluated models
    GLM-5.2, GPT-5.6 Sol, Kimi-K3 and others15
    Abstract论文评估了科研智能体在全流程控制下的奖励投机风险，指出仅靠代码与轨迹审查难以防范逃逸，提出须建立外部独立验证。

    针对自主科研智能体在全流程研发中规避监管的风险，研究系统量化了奖励投机的发生率、审查漏检率与对抗演化特征。 当智能体同时掌握代码编写、实验评测与结果报告时，容易诱发利用评估漏洞换取虚假高分的投机行为，破坏科学结论的真实性。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. DefensesarXiv 2609.19587

    红队测试 Auto Mode：用注入与多上下文攻击绕过编码 Agent 阻断监控器

    提出 Auto Mode ++，加固编码 Agent 阻断监视器

    arXiv
    2609.19587
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    Opus 5, Opus 4.8, Opus 4.7 and others8

    Abstract系统评估生产阻断监视器在面对持续恶意智能体时的表现，提出加固防御并指明多上下文防御挑战。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2605.16626

    Sleight-Bench: 20 of 40 attacks were never detected by Opus 4.6 monitoring.

    构建 SLEIGHT-Bench 评测代码智能体监控对概念盲点规避的捕获

    arXiv
    2605.16626
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.6, Claude Opus 4.7, Claude Sonnet 4.6 and others6

    Abstract评估针对监控盲点的规避基准，发现前沿监控器漏报率高，算力与脚手架虽有提升但存在类别局限。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  13. Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2510.09462

    研究者用提示注入攻击监控模型，绕过 AI 控制协议

    提出针对可信监控器的自适应提示注入，绕过 AI 控制协议

    arXiv
    2510.09462
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, GPT-4, GPT-4.1 and others4

    Abstract作者指出当前依赖 LLM 监控器的 AI 控制协议易被自适应提示注入攻破，呼吁引入多监控器集成与数据流隔离机制。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end