Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 10 papers
Filter4

Attack type

Prompt injection8Poisoning and backdoors8

Impact

Unauthorized actions7

System type

AI Agent26coding agent8Multi-agent systems3

Attack surface / entry point

User input12Documents and messages7Tool responses5Tool and skill descriptions6Code repositories and dependencies7Memory writes4Inter-agent messages7Distribution channels6

Layer

Application layer10

System component

MCP and skills3Memory3
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 203papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
System type：coding agentSystem type：Multi-agent systemsAttack surface / entry point：Tool and skill descriptionsAttack surface / entry point：Memory writesClear all

Another 203papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  2. Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2609.35912

    MMSkillRisk：多模态技能图像中的隐藏指令可诱导 Agent 执行未授权操作

    提出 MMSkillRisk 基准，评测多模态技能图像中的隐藏指令诱导 Agent 越权操作

    arXiv
    2609.35912
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.6-sol, Kimi-K2.6, Kimi-K3 and others6

    Abstract论文提出 MMSkillRisk 基准与 NCVA 攻击，揭示多模态技能中教学图像潜藏指令可引发未授权操作并与良性任务共存。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2609.32635

    TrustFork：显示身份如何劫持 LLM 智能体编排的权限

    提出 TRUSTFORK 基准，评测展示身份劫持多智能体编排权限

    arXiv
    2609.32635
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    Multi-agent systems, coding agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.6-Sol, GPT-5.6-Luna, Kimi-K3 and others8

    Abstract论文提出了多智能体安全基准 TRUSTFORK，揭示展示身份如何劫持操作权威，并证明事后验证无法弥补已发生的执行破坏。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2609.32616

    Cave-Bench：虚假指控下 LLM 智能体最高 60.06% 的运行会破坏正确工作

    提出 CAVE-BENCH，评测智能体在虚假指责下破坏已完成的正确工作

    arXiv
    2609.32616
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude-Sonnet-5, Claude-Opus-5, GPT-5.6-Sol and others14

    Abstract论文提出了评估智能体在虚假指责下破坏已有正确成果的 CAVE-BENCH，发现强模型易推翻已知证据，提出了门控缓解方案。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2609.24662

    DUMA-Bench：评估 LLM Agent 安全的双控多智能体基准

    提出双控多智能体基准 DUMA-Bench，测量对抗环境下的策略违反

    arXiv
    2609.24662
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    Multi-agent systems
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5, GPT-5-mini, GPT-5-nano and others14
    AbstractDUMA-Bench 用双控交互评测智能体安全。

    DUMA-Bench 把 τ²-bench 的双控交互做成智能体安全评测，用来看策略违反如何随用户、模型和环境一起出现。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2608.03272

    多智能体协同过滤系统的连接性攻击与防御研究

    复现 AgentCF 上的多智能体攻防并刻画连通性作用

    arXiv
    2608.03272
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    Multi-agent systems
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-235B-A22B, Claude Haiku 4.5, Mixtral 8×7B and others4
    Abstract连通性沿 k 与ρ改变攻防，且用户/物品与早期/稳态需要分开看。

    作者在 AgentCF 上研究连通性如何改变多智能体协同过滤的攻防，复现已有方法而不是提出新载荷。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2607.14611

    论文评测 Claude Code 与 Codex 记忆文件中的提示注入风险

    评测编码 Agent 记忆文件中提示注入的跨会话影响

    arXiv
    2607.14611
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude Haiku 4.5, Claude Opus 4.7, GPT-5.2 and others4
    Abstract已植入记忆文件的载荷可以跨会话影响 Claude Code 与 Codex，攻击成功与载荷是否留下是两种不同的失败。

    Bad Memory 在沙箱合成工作区里评测文件型持久记忆上的提示注入，比较载荷能否改变当前会话，以及能否在后续会话中留下或叠加。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2605.17380

    Uber proposes ADR enterprise-level agent detection system, deployed on 7,200 hosts for ten months

    提出企业级检测系统 ADR，识别编程 Agent 的提示注入与恶意 MCP

    arXiv
    2605.17380
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent

    Abstract提出了端点因果遥测、两级在线分流与离线红队闭环的 ADR 系统，并在生产环境中验证了有效性。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end