Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.
Oct 12 · Monday
Another 233 papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
“
About this collection Collection in progress We are building a large AI safety paper collection to help researchers find work related to their interests. Papers are collected automatically andfiltered only for relevance to AI safety , without judging quality, novelty or reading value. The default “Annotated first” shows papers with tags or published paper analyses first. Each group is ordered by original publication date, newest first, with undated papers last. “Newest first” uses publication dates only. This order is not a quality ranking.
One-line summaries, tags and paper analyses are prepared by AI from the papers. Language models may have systematic biases and produce hallucinations.We plan to carry out human annotation and review to reduce errors in this content.
提出 SAGE，定位代码修复 Agent 最早偏离安全意图的轮次
Published Oct 5
Evaluated models GPT-5.5 , Claude Opus 4.8 , Gemini 3.1 Pro and others6 Abstract SAGE 在已通过检查的修复轨迹上定位静默失败的最早偏离，类型比轮次更稳定。SAGE 在已通过语法和功能检查、但仍含确认安全缺陷的智能体修复轨迹上，定位最早可归因的安全意图偏离。 。
Arguing that safety alignment continuously disappears in self-evolving AI societies
Published Feb 10
Evaluated models Qwen3-8B Abstract The authors claim that closed self-evolution makes safety alignment unsustainable.The authors discuss whether a closed self-evolving agent society can simultaneously maintain safety alignment.
You have reached the end