Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.
Oct 12 · Monday
Another 261 papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
“
About this collection Collection in progress We are building a large AI safety paper collection to help researchers find work related to their interests. Papers are collected automatically andfiltered only for relevance to AI safety , without judging quality, novelty or reading value. The default “Annotated first” shows papers with tags or published paper analyses first. Each group is ordered by original publication date, newest first, with undated papers last. “Newest first” uses publication dates only. This order is not a quality ranking.
One-line summaries, tags and paper analyses are prepared by AI from the papers. Language models may have systematic biases and produce hallucinations.We plan to carry out human annotation and review to reduce errors in this content.
提出双缺口框架，统一智能体软件工程中的奖励投机与幻觉
Published Sep 11 Abstract 双缺口解释内环为何会放行部署后不可接受的实现，外环用现实证据持续修订 R、M 与 E。Reality Is the Final Verifier 用 two-gap framework 解释智能体软件工程的主要失败，并主张用外层保证环持续收窄缺口，而不是试图在部署前证明缺口已关闭。
提出技能名称抢注攻击，利用 Agent 虚构技能名实施供应链劫持
Published Jul 14
Evaluated models GLM-4.5-Air , GPT-5.4-mini , Claude Sonnet 4.6 and others12 Abstract 研究证实智能体虚构技能名具有高发生率与可预测性，现有防御难以兼顾安全与效用，亟需注册表结构性防护。本研究系统揭示了大模型智能体技能推荐场景下的虚构技能名称安全风险，将其形式化为一种新型供应链抢注攻击。
You have reached the end