Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 254papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

System type：coding agent System type：Browser and computer use Layer：Prompt layer Layer：Application layer Clear all

Another 254papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2610.12569Oct 9
SWE-Duel: Toward a Self-Expanding Arena for Coding Agents
Proposes SWE-Duel, which lets coding agents mutually evaluate, create problems, and blindly review fixes during evaluation.
arXiv
2610.12569
Published
Oct 9
Layer
Application layer
Setting
coding agent
Evaluated models
GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.8, Kimi K2.7 Code and others11
AbstractThe mutual evaluation arena creates questions during evaluation.
SWE-Duel is a coding agent arena that generates tasks and judges only at evaluation time, to avoid leakage and saturation of static benchmarks.
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2610.11942Oct 8
LGWM: Verifying GUI agent screen transitions with action-conditioned world models
Proposes LGWM, using an action-conditioned world model to verify GUI agent screen transitions.
arXiv
2610.11942
Published
Oct 8
Layer
Application layer
Setting
Browser and computer use
Evaluated models
LGWM
- DefensesMonitoring and auditing
- AttacksPrompt injection
- ComponentMonitors
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2610.11773Oct 8
研究提出 Agent 安全新维度：识别未履行的安全义务
提出义务识别基准 ObligationBench，并训练护栏识别 Agent 未履行的安全义务
arXiv
2610.11773
Published
Oct 8
Layer
Application layer
Setting
coding agent
Evaluated models
ObligationGuard, Claude-Opus-4.8, GPT-5.6-Sol and others17
- DefensesDetection and filtering
- RiskDangerous agent actions
- ComponentGuardrails and judges
Abstract义务是护栏缺口。
作者认为编码智能体的安全不能只靠拦截禁止动作，还要找出终止时仍未做的安全关键动作，并将其称为义务。
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2610.10150Oct 7
The paper points out that the reliability of LLM vulnerability repair benchmarks is affected by evaluation design.
用对照实验隔离评测设计对漏洞补丁基准得分的影响
arXiv
2610.10150
Published
Oct 7
Layer
Application layer
Setting
coding agent
Evaluated models
Claude Sonnet 4.0, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Claude Opus 4.7
Abstract作者认为评测流水线会改变补丁基准分数，PoC 通过率高于开发者测试通过率。
作者把 LLM 漏洞补丁基准的评测流水线当作会改变测量结果的对象，并明确说本文不是再做一个用于排名的基准。
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2610.09944Oct 7
AgentTime 基准测试智能体时长遵循能力，GPT-6 Astra 出现 14 次做完后休眠
提出 AgentTime 基准，评测智能体按时长工作与估时能力
arXiv
2610.09944
Published
Oct 7
Layer
Application layer
Setting
coding agent
Evaluated models
Fable 5.1, GPT-5.6 Sol, GPT-6 Astra and others7
Abstract作者把完成任务和管理所用时间分开。
AgentTime 是对智能体时间自控的评测：预测任务耗时、按要求时长工作、事后估计已用时间。
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2610.10619Oct 7
TestJack 审计编码基准
提出 TESTJACK，动态审计编码基准通过判定是否满足任务要求
arXiv
2610.10619
Published
Oct 7
Layer
Application layer
Setting
coding agent
Evaluated models
Claude Opus 4.6, Claude Opus 4.7, Claude Opus 4.8 and others7
- RiskReward hacking
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2610.08902Oct 7
论文提出 agent plasticity 指标衡量智能体通过经验自我改进的效率
提出 agent plasticity 指标衡量智能体通过经验自我改进的效率
arXiv
2610.08902
Published
Oct 7
Layer
Application layer
Setting
coding agent
Evaluated models
Claude Fable 5, Claude Opus 5, GPT-5.6 Sol and others10
- ComponentMemory
Abstract作者用固定权重协议比较前沿模型把经验写成制品后的留出增益与习得效率。
作者用 agent plasticity 衡量一件事：权重冻结时，智能体把经验写成可继承制品，再换成留出能力增益，这个转换有多省。
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2610.08662Oct 7
ParanoiaEval：编码智能体不必要风险处置评测基准发布
提出 ParanoiaEval 评测编码智能体的不必要风险处置
arXiv
2610.08662
Published
Oct 7
Layer
Application layer
Setting
coding agent
Evaluated models
Opus-5, Sonnet-5, Sonnet-4.6 and others8
Abstract作者用证据受控任务对评测风险处置，称其普遍、独立于任务能力并降低满意度。
作者提出 ParanoiaEval，并称它是编码智能体风险处置能力的首个统一基准。要解决的问题是：证据已经确定风险应如何处置之后，智能体仍可能扩大验证、增加保护或备份，而现有评测要么只看功能正确性，要么把相关行为拆开研究。做法是把 NIST 的 ATMA 落到仓库任务。
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2610.07639Oct 6
HarnessSecurity-Bench horizontally evaluates the security mechanisms of six coding agent frameworks.
评测编码智能体 harness 安全机制在对抗任务中的防护效果
arXiv
2610.07639
Published
Oct 6
Layer
Application layer
Setting
coding agent
- AttacksPrompt injection
- ComponentPermissions and sandboxing
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2610.07557Oct 6
CheckerBench：长程 Agent 能否合成静态分析检查器
用 CheckerBench 评测长程编码 Agent 合成静态分析检查器
arXiv
2610.07557
Published
Oct 6
Layer
Application layer
Setting
coding agent
Evaluated models
GPT-5.6-Sol, Claude Opus 4.8, Qwen3.8-Max and others7
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2610.06584Oct 6
论文：AI 在非公开漏洞上更帮攻击者还是防御者
评测 coding agent 在非公开漏洞上的利用生成、修复与后续攻击
arXiv
2610.06584
Published
Oct 6
Layer
Application layer
Setting
coding agent
Evaluated models
Opus 5, GPT-5.6 Sol, GPT-6 Sol and others10
- RiskDangerous capabilities
Abstract攻防孰强随环境、系统和弱点改变。
作者比较编程智能体在利用生成与漏洞修复上的自主表现，并检查修复之后还能不能被攻破。文中的 help 指自主完成任务，不是提升人类操作者。
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2610.06406Oct 5
AgentMonBench：面向长时程智能体行为监控的软件工程基准
提出 AgentMonBench 评测长时程编程智能体监控并检验 EBG
arXiv
2610.06406
Published
Oct 5
Layer
Application layer
Setting
coding agent
Evaluated models
GPT-5.6 Luna, GPT-5.6 Terra, GPT-5.6 Sol and others8
- DefensesMonitoring and auditing
- RiskDangerous agent actions
- ComponentMonitors
AbstractAgentMonBench 评测后果性决策监控，EBG 组织证据。
长时程软件工程任务里，用户要判断智能体哪些选择值得核验。作者用 AgentMonBench 评测监控器，并用免训练的 EBG 组织带源证据。
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2610.06193Oct 5
SWE-CC 基准：编码 Agent 功能正确仍违反 43.1% 仓库贡献规范
提出 SWE-CC 基准，评测编码 Agent 对仓库贡献策略的遵守
arXiv
2610.06193
Published
Oct 5
Layer
Application layer
Setting
coding agent
Evaluated models
GPT-5.6 Luna, Gemini 3.7 Flash, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and others4
AbstractSWE-CC 中功能正确仍可能违规。
SWE-CC 评测编码智能体是否遵守仓库贡献策略，而不只看补丁能否通过测试。
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2610.03818Oct 2
Control OSWorld：面向 GUI 计算机操作 Agent 的 AI 控制评测环境
提出 Control OSWorld，评测失准 GUI Agent 的监控
arXiv
2610.03818
Published
Oct 2
Layer
Application layer
Setting
Browser and computer use
Evaluated models
Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.8, GPT-5.2 and others6
- DefensesMonitoring and auditing
- RiskDeception and scheming
- ComponentMonitors
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2609.39903Sep 30
OSWorld-Science：面向科学软件学习与使用的计算机操作智能体基准
提出 OSWorld-Science 基准，评测计算机使用智能体完成科学软件工作流的能力
arXiv
2609.39903
Published
Sep 30
Layer
Application layer
Setting
Browser and computer use
Evaluated models
Claude Fable 5.1, Claude Opus 5, Claude Sonnet 5 and others12
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2609.37686Sep 29
EngiWorld 基准发布：前沿 Agent 在专业工程环境中最高仅得 44.3 分
提出 EngiWorld 基准，评测 Agent 在专业工程软件中走完设计闭环的能力
arXiv
2609.37686
Published
Sep 29
Layer
Application layer
Setting
Browser and computer use
Evaluated models
Claude Opus 5 (Max), GPT-5.6-Sol (XHigh), Qwen 3.8 Max and others7
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2609.36817Sep 29
pikit：面向间接提示注入研究与评测的可组合工具包
构建可组合工具包 pikit，评测编码智能体的间接提示注入
arXiv
2609.36817
Published
Sep 29
Layer
Application layer
Setting
coding agent
- AttacksPrompt injection
Abstractpikit 提供组合式间接注入评测。
pikit 是面向间接提示注入研究的组合式工具包，主要贡献是组织攻击、投递通道、防御和判定流程，而非提出新的攻击优化算法。
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2610.06898Sep 29
DIBench：面向移动 GUI 智能体多候选选择决策完整性的安全基准
用 DIBench 评测移动 GUI 智能体被 UI 注入后的决策完整性
arXiv
2610.06898
Published
Sep 29
Layer
Application layer
Setting
Browser and computer use
Evaluated models
Qwen2.5-VL(32B), Qwen3-VL(32B), GUI-Owl(32B) and others7
- AttacksPrompt injection
- ComponentVision
Abstract论文提出移动智能体决策完整性基准 DIBench，发现欺诈 UI 注入诱导目标选择并推高完成率，通用防御收益不稳定。
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2609.35557Sep 29
论文：容器、权限规则与沙箱都无法区分读取研究代码的是编译器还是编码 Agent
评测容器、权限规则与沙箱能否区分编译器与编码 Agent 的文件读取
arXiv
2609.35557
Published
Sep 29
Layer
Application layer
Setting
coding agent
- DefensesPermissions and approval
- RiskDangerous agent actions
- ComponentPermissions and sandboxing
Abstract此 harness 表达不了编译器可读而智能体不可读，五条路径两边都不覆盖。
作者在物理流求解器上检查一套编码智能体配置：编译器必须读本组材料与反应模型，这些字节又不得进入模型上下文或离开本机的记录。
Paper analysisRead analysis
Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2609.35912Sep 28
MMSkillRisk：多模态技能图像中的隐藏指令可诱导 Agent 执行未授权操作
提出 MMSkillRisk 基准，评测多模态技能图像中的隐藏指令诱导 Agent 越权操作
arXiv
2609.35912
Published
Sep 28
Layer
Application layer
Setting
coding agent
Evaluated models
GPT-5.6-sol, Kimi-K2.6, Kimi-K3 and others6
- AttacksPrompt injection
- TechniqueCross-modal payloads
- ComponentMCP and skills
Abstract论文提出 MMSkillRisk 基准与 NCVA 攻击，揭示多模态技能中教学图像潜藏指令可引发未授权操作并与良性任务共存。
Paper analysisRead analysis

AI Safety Daily

Read the latest issueOne issue per day, updated as events develop