Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.
Oct 13 · Tuesday
Another 215 papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
“
About this collection Collection in progress We are building a large AI safety paper collection to help researchers find work related to their interests. Papers are collected automatically andfiltered only for relevance to AI safety , without judging quality, novelty or reading value. The default “Annotated first” shows papers with tags or published paper analyses first. Each group is ordered by original publication date, newest first, with undated papers last. “Newest first” uses publication dates only. This order is not a quality ranking.
One-line summaries, tags and paper analyses are prepared by AI from the papers. Language models may have systematic biases and produce hallucinations.We plan to carry out human annotation and review to reduce errors in this content.
提出拓扑条件后门,使代码模型在推断多智能体部署时植入漏洞
Published Oct 5
Evaluated models Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct , Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct Abstract 论文证实了拓扑条件后门的可训练性与泛化性,展示了常规评测盲区,并提出差异化拓扑审计作为检测防御方向。
提出 CGMIA,检测代码生成基准样本是否泄漏进训练集
Published Sep 9
Evaluated models Qwen2.5-Coder (3B) , CodeGemma (2B) , DeepSeek-Coder (1.3B) and others5 Abstract CGMIA 融合相似度、通过率、困惑度与 CodeBERT,在模拟泄漏上优于八个 MIA 基线。CGMIA 用成员推断检测代码生成基准是否泄入 LLM 训练集,使评测不依赖对训练语料的直接访问。
You have reached the end