Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 8 papers

Another 227papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. MADBench:多智能体辩论安全性评测基准发布

    提出 MADBench,评测多智能体辩论是吸收还是放大对抗影响

    Published
    Evaluated models
    gpt-4o, GPT-5, GPT-6 Astra
    AbstractMADBench 显示辩论能吸收部分准确率攻击,同时放大未授权读写。

    MADBench 是一个评测多智能体辩论安全性的基准,用来看攻击是被辩论吸收还是被放大。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2609.38270

    VirusCascade:劫持 LLM 推荐智能体的协同反思机制

    提出 VirusCascade,联合操纵商品描述与交互轨迹以劫持推荐智能体协同反思

    Published
    Evaluated models
    AgentCF, AgentSEQ, AgentRAG and others4
    Abstract作者把反思写回视为推广攻击入口,并用联合操纵和诊断探针研究其持续与传播。

    VirusCascade 是针对推荐智能体协作反思的 black-box targeted promotion 攻击研究。 攻击者只改商品描述和少量账号的普通交互,试图让目标商品获得更多良性用户曝光。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. DUMA-Bench:评估 LLM Agent 安全的双控多智能体基准

    提出双控多智能体基准 DUMA-Bench,测量对抗环境下的策略违反

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5, GPT-5-mini, GPT-5-nano and others14
    AbstractDUMA-Bench 用双控交互评测智能体安全。

    DUMA-Bench 把 τ²-bench 的双控交互做成智能体安全评测,用来看策略违反如何随用户、模型和环境一起出现。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. Emergence World:对长时程多智能体系统开展对抗压力测试

    提出 Emergence World,对长时程多智能体系统开展对抗压力测试

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.8, DeepSeek v4 Pro, Gemini 3.5 Flash and others9

    Abstract作者通过长期平行世界实验指出模型对齐不具备可组合性,单模型群体会产生社会奉承、协同退缩及语言不透明等失效。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. DefensesarXiv 2603.04474

    From Spark to Wildfire: Modeling and Mitigating Error Cascades in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Collaboration

    Proposing a lineage-graph governance layer to suppress error cascades in multi-agent collaboration

    Published
    AbstractA single seed can solidify into a false consensus along a fixed collaboration graph.

    The authors turn "small errors becoming collective false consensus" in LLM-MAS into a measurable propagation on a graph, and use a plug-in that only changes messages, not topology, to reduce the final infection.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. MobiRed 框架测评八款移动 LLM Agent 的第三方渠道提示注入攻击

    用 MobiRed 评测移动 LLM Agent 面对第三方渠道的提示注入

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Mobile-Agent-E, AppAgent, AutoGLM and others8

    Abstract论文评估了移动 LLM 智能体作为 confused deputy 的易受攻击性,作者称非应用控制通道可诱导智能体执行多步越权危害。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end