Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 13 papers

Another 240papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. DefensesarXiv 2610.03073

    SecJev:为 System One 决策模型引入安全专业知识

    提出 SecJev,用场景加权训练把决策模型适配为安全类型化判断

    Published
    Evaluated models
    SecJev-0.8B, SecJev-2B, SecJev-4B and others4
    AbstractSecJev 用共享打分器做安全决策,0.8B 的 task-macro 超过 Kev-9B。

    SecJev 是 0.8B 到 9B 的安全决策模型族,作者称据其所知是首个面向安全的 Jev-like 家族。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. DefensesarXiv 2610.03089

    COBRA: A Dual-LLM Architecture for Defending Computer-Using Agents Against Branch-Jumping Attacks

    提出 COBRA 双 LLM 架构,防御计算机使用 Agent 的分支转向攻击

    Published
    Evaluated models
    gpt-5, UI-TARS-1.5-7B, claude-sonnet-5 and others6

    Abstract提出分支转向防御架构 COBRA,通过事前能力约束与边界代理消除分支转向攻击并兼顾效用。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. DIBench:面向移动 GUI 智能体多候选选择决策完整性的安全基准

    用 DIBench 评测移动 GUI 智能体被 UI 注入后的决策完整性

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-VL(32B), Qwen3-VL(32B), GUI-Owl(32B) and others7

    Abstract论文提出移动智能体决策完整性基准 DIBench,发现欺诈 UI 注入诱导目标选择并推高完成率,通用防御收益不稳定。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. Jev 被用于零样本检测十类对齐失败,中位 AUROC 达 0.886

    提出 RLCDAlignBench,零样本检测多种对齐失败

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Jev (jev-1.13.0)
    Abstract一次通用问题已能给多数对齐失败排序,大的误差来自状态和标签。

    RLCDAlignBench 测量用强化学习做校准决策的 Jev,能否当作对齐失败的零样本检测器。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2609.28613

    研究:提示注入可改变 Jev 决策模型的行动概率

    测量间接提示注入对类型化概率决策的动作劫持

    Published
    Evaluated models
    jev-1.13.0
    Abstract封闭动作集改变提示注入的表现,但没有去掉概率被不可信内容移动的风险。

    作者在 jev-1.13.0 上研究 decision hijacking:不可信内容能否在用户任务和可选动作都不变时,把类型化决策推向攻击者目标。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2606.06244

    研究者提出 Ghostwriter 攻击:用伪造证据注入操纵 LLM 观点

    提出 Ghostwriter 攻击,用伪权威证据条件注入操纵模型观点

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, Claude-3.7-Sonnet, DeepSeek-V3 and others10
    Abstract作者称攻击未被消除。

    Ghostwriter 是一种针对上下文窗口的观点引导攻击:把误导陈述改写成伪权威文本,再在相关查询中让目标模型把该观点写进回答。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. DefensesarXiv 2603.14707

    Visual Confusion Agents: Exploiting and Defending Against Perception Failures in Computer-Use Agents

    Proposes out-of-process dual-channel comparison classification to intercept erroneous clicks by computer-use agents

    Published
    Evaluated models
    multi-modal-embed-small
    AbstractPerception errors can be exploited by swapping screen pixels.

    The authors frame CUA's perception failure as a security vulnerability, visual confused deputy: the agent authorizes click(x,y) based on a misread screen, and the actual landing point differs from the element it believes it is clicking.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. DefensesarXiv 2602.10915

    Blind Gods and Broken Screens: Building a Secure, Intent-Centric Mobile Agent Operating System

    提出 Aura,用可信内核中介移动 Agent 的身份、感知与动作控制

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Gemini-3-Flash
    AbstractAura mediates structured interactions via the Agent Kernel.

    Aura uses kernel-mediated structured agent interaction, replacing screen-interface mobile assistants..

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. MobiRed 框架测评八款移动 LLM Agent 的第三方渠道提示注入攻击

    用 MobiRed 评测移动 LLM Agent 面对第三方渠道的提示注入

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Mobile-Agent-E, AppAgent, AutoGLM and others8

    Abstract论文评估了移动 LLM 智能体作为 confused deputy 的易受攻击性,作者称非应用控制通道可诱导智能体执行多步越权危害。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end