Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.
Oct 12 · Monday
Another 233 papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
“
About this collection Collection in progress We are building a large AI safety paper collection to help researchers find work related to their interests. Papers are collected automatically andfiltered only for relevance to AI safety , without judging quality, novelty or reading value. The default “Annotated first” shows papers with tags or published paper analyses first. Each group is ordered by original publication date, newest first, with undated papers last. “Newest first” uses publication dates only. This order is not a quality ranking.
One-line summaries, tags and paper analyses are prepared by AI from the papers. Language models may have systematic biases and produce hallucinations.We plan to carry out human annotation and review to reduce errors in this content.
检验推理 token 数能否区分被提示的诚实与不诚实作答
Published Oct 8
Evaluated models Gemma-4-e4b , Qwen-3.5-9b , GPT-OSS-120B Abstract 被提示不诚实时推理 token 组水平更高。三个推理模型在被提示的回答政策下出现组水平推理 token 差异。作者把它当作不读思维链内容的 black-box 候选信号，而不是自发欺骗检测器。
分析隐蔽推理在思维链监控下的信息足迹下界与不可读性
Published Sep 29
Evaluated models Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct , Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct , Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B and others12 Abstract 论文从理论与实证探明了思维链监控的边界：复杂隐蔽计算必然泄露信息足迹且需承担长度税，但该足迹可被在线加密而不可读。
把口头评测感知分成能力与安全框架并检验对服从的预测
Published Aug 28
Evaluated models Qwen3-32B , OLMo-3-32B-Think Abstract 能力型与安全型口头 eval-awareness 对服从的符号相反，聚合抑制率因此不能代表安全相关成分。作者分析 Qwen3-32B 在安全评测中的口头 eval-awareness，认为它不是单一、行为上均匀的量。
You have reached the end