Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 18 papers
Filter6
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 215papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Another 215papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. Space beats statistics, retraining beats ranking: auditing training labels under label-only backdoors

    Auditing training labels for label-only backdoors, comparing spaces and statistics, and judging by retraining

    Published
    Evaluated models
    ResNet-32
    AbstractLabel inspection must be done in a space that has not been fitted to these labels, and judged by retrained models rather than detection scores.

    The authors ask: can a defender without trusted data decide which training labels to keep, and how much clean data this destroys, and what the final model accuracy is.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. DefensesarXiv 2610.11012

    Redwood Research proposes the distillation double bind: using distillation to make models confess hidden behavior or inherit only capabilities

    提出 DFI 与 DFC 蒸馏,定罪隐瞒失配的教师或安全提取能力

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct (AuditBench SFT/KTO organisms), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct (DFI distilled student), Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (DFI distilled student) and others4

    Abstract概括了论文针对隐瞒失配模型提出的 DFI 与 DFC 机制、主实验发现及适用边界。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. DefensesarXiv 2610.03073

    SecJev:为 System One 决策模型引入安全专业知识

    提出 SecJev,用场景加权训练把决策模型适配为安全类型化判断

    Published
    Evaluated models
    SecJev-0.8B, SecJev-2B, SecJev-4B and others4
    AbstractSecJev 用共享打分器做安全决策,0.8B 的 task-macro 超过 Kev-9B。

    SecJev 是 0.8B 到 9B 的安全决策模型族,作者称据其所知是首个面向安全的 Jev-like 家族。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AbstractFBS 辩论用 fbs 约束敏感分解,给出最坏情况占优策略,并匹配黑盒查询下界。

    FBS Debate 是一套可扩展监督的辩论规则:两名计算方争论一个可递归分解的是非问题,人类只在最后选出的子问题上做黑盒判断。要处理的缺口是,prover-estimator debate 虽能覆盖稳定分解,但只在输入分布的平均意义下成立,而且 Bob 的获胜策略一般要跟着 Alice 的作弊策略变。作者要在同一问题类上,让每个错误实例都能被抓住,并让诚实且正确成为双方的占优策略。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. DefensesarXiv 2609.39107

    MASCRDM:面向大语言模型训练过程的合规风险检测与缓解多智能体系统

    提出 MASCRDM,在监督微调中实时检测并缓解偏见

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-8B-Base, Llama-3.1-8B
    AbstractMASCRDM 在 SFT 中按法规图谱检测数据、结构与损失风险,BBQ 总准确率在两模型上最高。

    MASCRDM 把 AI 法律规章编成知识图谱,再由五个智能体在 LLM 训练中做实时合规检测与缓解,实验以偏见与歧视为代表风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. DefensesarXiv 2609.36641

    Inducing process supervision from outcome-only reward reinforcement learning

    Proposes TIPS, inducing generative process supervision with only outcome rewards

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-4B-Thinking-2507, Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507, Qwen3-8B-Thinking and others8
    AbstractOutcome-supervised GRPO can induce step verification.

    TIPS trains a generative reward model using reinforcement learning with only outcome correctness, allowing step-level verification to appear in the chain of thought.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. DefensesarXiv 2609.34804

    物理认证联邦学习:为关键水务基础设施的协同异常检测提供安全保障

    为协同异常检测提出物理准入门,在聚合前拦截不合规训练批次

    Published
    Evaluated models
    deep reconstruction autoencoder
    Abstract物理准入为联邦检测增加数据约束,但合规证明不等于无投毒或训练来源证明。

    这是一项面向水基础设施联邦异常检测的物理准入防御研究。 作者针对隐藏训练遥测带来的投毒检查问题,结合不变量挖掘、聚合前过滤和零知识抽样证明。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. AttacksarXiv 2609.27124

    Fed-ADR:用恶意编排服务器协同客户端梯度操纵攻击联邦学习

    提出 Fed-ADR,用编排服务器协同操纵梯度攻破联邦学习并检测恢复

    Published
    Attacker
    Gray-box
    Evaluated models
    CNN(MNIST:2 Conv + 3 FC), CNN(Fashion-MNIST:6 Conv + 1 FC), ResNet18(CIFAR-10)
    AbstractFed-ADR 用 gray-box 编排攻击绕过多种聚合防御,再用 Hessian 一致性检测和窗口内恢复把准确率拉回。

    Fed-ADR 是一套面向联邦学习的攻击、检测与恢复框架:编排服务器改写合谋客户端的梯度,使参数服务器的现有防御把投毒更新当成良性,同时在发现后用历史梯度把全局模型原地修回来。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. DefensesarXiv 2609.07063

    VERITAS:抗投毒的本地差分隐私图学习协议

    提出 VERITAS,用双边背书剪除本地隐私图学习中的投毒节点

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GCN, GraphSAGE, GAT
    AbstractVERITAS 用分级信任的双边背书剪除 LDP 图学习中的投毒节点,并恢复分类准确率。

    VERITAS 是面向本地差分隐私图学习的投毒防御协议,按 trust-but-verify 在保持 ϵ-LDP 的同时剪除伪造节点。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. DefensesarXiv 2609.06346

    面向后门攻击下持续学习的鲁棒动态扩展:净化与选择性恢复

    提出持续学习下的净化与选择性恢复框架,抵御逐任务训练投毒后门

    Published
    Evaluated models
    ViT-B/16
    Abstract作者报告任务内净化与恢复可配合动态专家防御后门,但保证依赖分离条件。

    这是一项面向持续图像分类的后门防御研究:模型只使用当前任务数据,同时需要保留过去知识并避免学习恶意监督。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. DefensesarXiv 2609.04665

    HackProbe:面向自演化语言模型奖励作弊的黑盒检测与免疫方法

    提出 HackProbe,黑盒检测并免疫自演化中的奖励作弊

    Published
    Abstract黑盒探针检测自演化奖励黑客,并以带宽受限重选回收真实能力。

    HackProbe 是挂在自演化循环上的黑盒监控器,用来发现奖励黑客并改选候选。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  12. DefensesarXiv 2608.12876

    SPARED:用对抗编辑数据训练基于推理的 AI 生成图像检测器

    提出 SPARED,用对抗编辑数据训练基于推理的 AI 生成图像检测器

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3.5-9B
    AbstractSPARED 用防捷径的编辑对抗环训练 9B 推理检测器。

    SPARED 是一套用于可解释 AI 生成图像检测的攻防强化学习流程,报告模型是 Qwen3.5-9B 上的第三轮防御器。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  13. DefensesarXiv 2608.02271

    Z-PEFT: Zero-shot backdoor detection for parameter-efficient fine-tuning based on canonical spectral features

    Propose Z-PEFT, which detects PEFT backdoors in a zero-shot manner using per-head spectral features.

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Z-PEFT, Llama-2-7B, Llama-2-13B and others6
    Paper analysisRead analysis
  14. CHERRL:可复现、分析与检测评分标准强化学习中的奖励作弊

    提出 CHERRL 注入裁判偏差以复现奖励作弊,并用 RHDA 检测训练起点

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-4B, Qwen3.5-plus, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and others4
    AbstractCHERRL 注入已知偏差以观察奖励黑客,并用于分析偏差和评测起点检测器 RHDA。

    CHERRL 是 rubric-based RL 的可控环境,用来复现奖励黑客、观察奖励分歧,并给检测器提供起点参照。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  15. DefensesarXiv 2602.01750

    Adversarial Reward Auditing: Proactively Detecting and Mitigating Reward Hacking

    提出 ARA,读取奖励模型激活并门控 RLHF 奖励以缓解奖励作弊

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama-2-7B, Llama-3.1-8B, Qwen-2.5-7B
    AbstractARA 用奖励模型内部表示检出利用,并在 RLHF 里按 Auditor 概率压低代理奖励。

    ARA 是一套两阶段的 RLHF 审计:先对冻结奖励模型找出利用回复,再在策略优化时按检出概率压低奖励。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end