Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 14 papers
Filter5

Attack type

Jailbreaks9Prompt injection3Poisoning and backdoors4

Attack technique

Gradient and representation optimization48Automated search65Multi-turn escalation24Encoding and obfuscation51Role-play and persuasion27Conversation structure manipulation11Reasoning-chain manipulation11Cross-modal payloads47Side channels3Defense-targeted31Dormant triggers29Selection manipulation3

Impact

Harmful content9

System type

Models and APIs11LLM applications4AI Agent13coding agent3Browser and computer use0

Attacker access

Black-box7

Attack surface / entry point

User input11Tool and skill descriptions4Distribution channels3

Layer

Prompt layer9Application layer3

System component

MCP and skills3Reasoning chains3
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 213papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Attack technique：Conversation structure manipulationAttack technique：Selection manipulationSystem type：Models and APIsSystem type：coding agentSystem type：Browser and computer useClear all

Another 213papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.12644

    Cancerous backdoor attack: progressive activation via invisible tokens and a stage controller.

    Proposes the Cancerous backdoor, which progressively corrupts reasoning using invisible stage tokens.

    arXiv
    2610.12644
    Published
    Layer
    Training and data layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3
    AbstractHidden tokens plus a stage controller make the backdoor progressively corrupt reasoning upon triggering, and the authors believe that looking only at the answer will miss it.

    Cancerous Backdoor Attack changes LLM backdoors from one-time activation to multi-stage reasoning corruption that accumulates progressively with triggers.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AttacksarXiv 2609.36956

    研究者提出 Controlled Decoding Attacks，通过纯文本接口越狱黑盒 LLM

    提出 BLINDBIAS，通过纯文本续写与前缀控制越狱黑盒模型

    arXiv
    2609.36956
    Published
    Layer
    Prompt layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    GLM-5, Gemini-3.5-Flash, Qwen3-32B and others4
    Abstract作者认为，隐藏数值概率并不足以消除支持重复采样和前缀续写的解码攻击面。

    BLINDBIAS 是一种针对 sample-only 续写接口的 black-box 解码时越狱框架，研究没有目标数值概率时，采样能否支持逐步控制。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2608.25776

    EvoMal attack uses self-poisoning of self-evolving coding agents to achieve worm-like propagation

    提出 EVOMAL，诱导自演化编码 Agent 在创建技能时自我投毒并蠕虫传播

    arXiv
    2608.25776
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    Devstral-Small-2, Gemma-4-31B-IT, Qwen3-Coder-Next and others7

    Abstract论文指出了自演化智能体模仿检索代码的自我毒化漏洞，提出 EVOMAL 攻击与防御，阐明了供应链新风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2608.09867

    Researchers steal proprietary LLM inference chains via cross-model compatibility of encrypted inference blocks

    利用加密思维块的跨模型重放，诱导弱模型逐字转写专有推理链

    arXiv
    2608.09867
    Published
    Layer
    Prompt layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.8, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Haiku 4.5 and others13

    Abstract论文揭示了客户端加密思维块跨模型互换漏洞，提出了低成本提取方法并给出防御方案。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. AttacksarXiv 2607.12340

    Research: LLM agent skill-name hallucination rates reach up to 62%, which can be exploited via squatting for supply-chain attacks

    提出技能名称抢注攻击，利用 Agent 虚构技能名实施供应链劫持

    arXiv
    2607.12340
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    GLM-4.5-Air, GPT-5.4-mini, Claude Sonnet 4.6 and others12
    Abstract研究证实智能体虚构技能名具有高发生率与可预测性，现有防御难以兼顾安全与效用，亟需注册表结构性防护。

    本研究系统揭示了大模型智能体技能推荐场景下的虚构技能名称安全风险，将其形式化为一种新型供应链抢注攻击。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. Analysis and theoryarXiv 2606.04168

    论文提出随机插入攻击，利用自回归一致性绕过 LLM 安全对齐

    解释自回归一致性如何导致浅层安全对齐，并提出随机插入攻击

    arXiv
    2606.04168
    Published
    Layer
    Prompt layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Abstract作者用自回归一致性串起浅层对齐、插入攻击和最坏延续对齐。

    作者把浅层安全对齐和一类续写攻击都归到自回归一致性上。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. InterpretabilityarXiv 2603.08234

    The Continuation vs. Refusal Debate: Mechanism Analysis of Continuation-Triggered Jailbreaks in Large Language Models

    Analyzing the attention head mechanism of continuation-triggered jailbreaks and proposing HCS

    arXiv
    2603.08234
    Published
    Layer
    Model layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    LLaMA-2-7B-Chat, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct
    AbstractThe authors state that jailbreaks arise from competition between two types of heads, and that HCS plus distillation can use this competition for inference-time intervention.

    The authors use attention head mechanism analysis for continuation-triggered jailbreaks: under the same harmful instruction, moving the continuation suffix from after the instruction to outside the prompt boundary makes the model more likely to continue generating along the suffix.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  13. AttacksarXiv 2510.10271

    MetaBreak：通过特殊 token 操纵越狱在线 LLM 服务

    提出 MetaBreak，用特殊 token 操纵越狱在线 LLM 服务并绕过审核

    arXiv
    2510.10271
    Published
    Layer
    Prompt layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct, Qwen-2.5-72B-Instruct, Gemma-2-27B-Instruct and others10

    Abstract利用特殊 token 注入对抗平台模板包裹与审核，多场景验证了越狱有效性与互补性。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end