Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 14 papers

Another 240papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. MADBench:多智能体辩论安全性评测基准发布

    提出 MADBench,评测多智能体辩论是吸收还是放大对抗影响

    Published
    Evaluated models
    gpt-4o, GPT-5, GPT-6 Astra
    AbstractMADBench 显示辩论能吸收部分准确率攻击,同时放大未授权读写。

    MADBench 是一个评测多智能体辩论安全性的基准,用来看攻击是被辩论吸收还是被放大。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. 研究用因果激活修补定位模型服从提示注入指令的决策层

    用因果激活修补定位模型服从提示注入的决策层

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-4B, Qwen3-14B, Qwen3-32B and others7
    Abstract合规的因果杠杆集中在网络后三分之一的低秩子空间,该层也是混淆下检测最好的位置。

    这篇工作用逐层激活修补定位提示注入合规发生在网络何处,并把该位置用于检测验证。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. DefensesarXiv 2609.34245

    研究者提出面向结构化 Agent 动作的多源完整性认证方法

    提出多源完整性认证器,在结构化 Agent 动作执行前按控制域决定准入或弃权

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.8, GPT-5.5, Gemini 3.1 Pro and others5
    Abstract作者给出条件性的动作完整性认证。

    这是一项结构化动作执行前的完整性防御研究,对象是从可腐化文档和工具输出拼装的支付等特权动作。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. DUMA-Bench:评估 LLM Agent 安全的双控多智能体基准

    提出双控多智能体基准 DUMA-Bench,测量对抗环境下的策略违反

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5, GPT-5-mini, GPT-5-nano and others14
    AbstractDUMA-Bench 用双控交互评测智能体安全。

    DUMA-Bench 把 τ²-bench 的双控交互做成智能体安全评测,用来看策略违反如何随用户、模型和环境一起出现。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. DefensesarXiv 2609.17648

    多智能体 LLM 流水线中的信任传播与结构隔离

    用任务绑定令牌和策略预言机拦住多智能体流水线的未授权执行

    Published
    Evaluated models
    gemma4:31b-cloud
    Abstract结构性授权拦住了记忆投毒的未授权执行,持密钥时承重的是策略预言机。

    作者在一条会改写沙箱邮件库的四智能体流水线上,检查低权限失陷会不会变成未授权的真实动作。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2607.00422

    KidnapRAG:黑盒投毒攻击劫持 Agentic RAG 的推理链

    提出 KidnapRAG,用投毒文档黑盒劫持 Agentic RAG 的推理链

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct, QwQ-32B and others5
    Abstract顺序投毒可把多步推理拖向指定应答,作者称关键在持续引导而非单次注入。

    KidnapRAG 是针对 Agentic RAG 的 black-box 语料投毒:攻击者不能访问模型、提示词、检索器或私有轨迹,只能发布可能被检索的文档,并利用公开界面上的推理与搜索查询。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2606.06244

    研究者提出 Ghostwriter 攻击:用伪造证据注入操纵 LLM 观点

    提出 Ghostwriter 攻击,用伪权威证据条件注入操纵模型观点

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, Claude-3.7-Sonnet, DeepSeek-V3 and others10
    Abstract作者称攻击未被消除。

    Ghostwriter 是一种针对上下文窗口的观点引导攻击:把误导陈述改写成伪权威文本,再在相关查询中让目标模型把该观点写进回答。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. AttacksarXiv 2603.17239

    LAAF: A Systematic Red-Teaming Method and Automated Attack Framework for LPCI Vulnerabilities in Agentic LLM Systems

    Proposes LAAF, which automatically attacks LPCI vulnerabilities in agent systems in stages

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gemini-2.0-flash-001, claude-3-haiku-20240307, meta-llama/llama-3.1-70b-instruct and others5
    AbstractLAAF does LPCI red teaming with taxonomy plus stage seeding.

    The authors state that LAAF is an automated red-teaming framework built specifically for LPCI in agentic LLMs. The issue to address is that encoded, delayed, and conditionally triggered payloads can persist in memory or RAG and re-enter across sessions, whereas Garak and PyRIT do not use the previous round's breakthrough results to seed the next stage across the six stages.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. AttacksarXiv 2602.01757

    Zero2Text: Training-Free Cross-Domain Text Embedding Inversion Attack

    提出 Zero2Text,无需训练地跨域反演文本嵌入

    Published
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    GTR-Base, Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B, Text-Embedding-3-small and others4
    Abstract零训练在线对齐可在未知域、无泄漏对时从黑盒 embedding 还原句子。

    Zero2Text 是一种不训练 decoder、也不使用泄漏文本–向量对的文本 embedding 反演,针对 RAG 向量库在严格黑盒、目标域未知时的还原。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. AttacksarXiv 2507.10457

    论文提出 LPCI:针对 Agent 逻辑层与持久记忆的提示控制注入攻击

    提出 LPCI,把延迟条件载荷写入记忆与检索库以跨会话触发

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    ChatGPT, Claude, LLaMA3 and others8
    Abstract作者定义 LPCI。

    作者把LPCI定义为针对智能体逻辑执行、记忆留存和工具集成的跨阶段漏洞类,而不是单次输入上的提示改写。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end