Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 399 papers
Filter4
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 240papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Another 240papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. DistressBench: Evaluating multi-dimensional crisis support in large language models

    Introduces DistressBench, evaluating models' multidimensional support in crisis conversations

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Muse Spark 1.2, Muse Spark 1.3, Muse Glimmer 30B and others20
    AbstractThe model is more restrained and acts less.

    DistressBench uses SSH dialogues written and revised by clinical personnel, and evaluates how much necessary care general chat models deliver according to weighted atomic criteria, rather than whether they refuse. When users disclose suicidal ideation or self-harm to a chat model, the authors consider the expected behavior to be recognizing the crisis, calibrating empathy, de-escalating, and referring to human help. Refusal-based evaluations cannot detect failing to act after recognizing the crisis.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. SWE-Duel: Toward a Self-Expanding Arena for Coding Agents

    Proposes SWE-Duel, which lets coding agents mutually evaluate, create problems, and blindly review fixes during evaluation.

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.8, Kimi K2.7 Code and others11
    AbstractThe mutual evaluation arena creates questions during evaluation.

    SWE-Duel is a coding agent arena that generates tasks and judges only at evaluation time, to avoid leakage and saturation of static benchmarks.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. The paper proposes the ISE framework to evaluate LLM agents' epistemic humility under knowledge conflicts

    Proposes the ISE framework to evaluate the epistemic humility of LLM agents under knowledge conflicts

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Nemotron-Orchestrator-8B, Claude Sonnet 4.6, GPT-5 and others5
    AbstractISE trajectory evaluations show that high task accuracy across four agents does not correspond to higher cognitive humility.

    What the authors want to test is not whether the agent's final answer is correct, but whether, when a knowledge conflict arises, it recognizes the gap in its trajectory, performs bounded tool follow-up, and writes the unresolved uncertainty to the user.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. 研究提出 Agent 安全新维度:识别未履行的安全义务

    提出义务识别基准 ObligationBench,并训练护栏识别 Agent 未履行的安全义务

    Published
    Evaluated models
    ObligationGuard, Claude-Opus-4.8, GPT-5.6-Sol and others17
    Abstract义务是护栏缺口。

    作者认为编码智能体的安全不能只靠拦截禁止动作,还要找出终止时仍未做的安全关键动作,并将其称为义务。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. 研究提出意图恢复率作为 LLM 安全评测的补充指标

    提出 IRIS,用意图恢复率区分遮蔽越狱下无害输出的原因

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Claude Opus 4.5 and others6
    Abstract无害输出的证据权重取决于任务是否被恢复。

    IRIS 把意图恢复当作中间信号,用来解释意图遮蔽提示下为何没有出现有害协助。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. Too many skills: how co-installed skills conflict in coding agents

    评测编码 Agent 中相似技能共同安装对已装技能核心功能的替代

    Published
    Evaluated models
    claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-haiku-4-5-20251001, claude-opus-5 and others6
    Abstract冲突藏在任务成功后面。

    作者对共同安装、做同一件事的良性 skill 做实证研究,用核心功能是否还在,而不是任务过不过,来看冲突。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. 研究:大语言模型版本更替削弱 AI 辅助科研写作筛查

    测量 LLM 版本更替对科学摘要 AI 改写检测器的影响

    Published
    Evaluated models
    RoBERTa-base, Pangram
    Abstract作者称检测器的基准准确率只是临时的,每次发布都要连同更早版本重验。

    作者量化的是:科学摘要的 AI 改写筛查,在 LLM 版本不断更换、而人类摘要误标必须少见时,会怎样变。问题来自期刊和会议已经按分数阈值筛查投稿,但基准多停在评估时可得的版本上。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. MH-INDIC:面向印度城市与半城市语境孕产妇健康 LLM 交互的文化对齐评估框架

    提出 MH-INDIC,评测印度语境母婴健康 LLM 交互的文化对齐

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Claude Sonnet 4.6, GPT-5, Gemini 3 Pro and others10
    Abstract作者称模型可接近人群均值,但画像变异低于人类,人类分数条件可改善对话。

    MH-INDIC 是面向城市与半城市北印度母婴互动的多维文化对齐评测。 它关心的不是医学事实是否正确,而是回复是否沿家庭权威、性别期待和情绪披露来推理。做法是把 Hofstede 六维改写到互动层,再加入 MAFC、BTB、SVO、MHS。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. Workerville: Toward an Organizational Behavior Explanation of Agent Safety

    构建 Workerville 基准,测量组织条件如何改变 Agent 的安全行为

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.2, Claude-Sonnet-4.6, Gemini-3.1-Pro and others6
    Abstract作者用 ACB 与 Workerville 测量组织条件对智能体安全的影响,并称结果支持可量化的组织行为框架。

    Workerville 用组织行为测量智能体安全如何随监督、同伴和记忆条件变化。。要处理的缺口是:持续运行的 LLM 智能体同时接收用户指令、同伴消息和长期记忆,但既有安全评测多把这些通道拆开,没有统一的定量测量。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. SSCBench:评估工具调用 LLM Agent 故障注入测试证据有效性的测量协议与基准

    提出 SSCBench,评测工具调用 Agent 故障注入测试的证据有效性

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    deepseek-flash, deepseek-v4-pro, gpt-5.6-luna and others5
    Abstract解释采纳前应报告该次执行的证据条件,以及支撑该主张的观察总体。

    SSCBench 研究工具使用智能体的故障注入结果,在什么证据条件下可以被解释。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. BeliefScope:区分证据与用户压力对模型信念影响的受控框架

    用 BeliefScope 分离固定命题上证据与压力对模型信念的影响

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-8B, Llama3.1-8B, Gemma3-12B and others4
    AbstractBeliefScope 把证据修正与压力偏移拆成绑定评测条件的行为画像。

    BeliefScope 是一个黑盒行为诊断框架,用来把固定命题上的回答变化拆成证据驱动的修正,和不加新事实的方向性压力。信念修正评测能看到信息基础变化后的更新,谄媚评测能看到用户影响下的顺从或漂移。作者认为,当两种输入都偏向同一结论时,表面偏移本身不能区分来源。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  12. EpiReal-Bench:商用图像生成模型虚假声明红队基准

    构建 EpiReal-Bench,评测图像生成器将虚假主张渲染为可信证据

    Published
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    GPT-Image-2, Nano Banana 2, Grok Imagen 2.0 and others4
    Abstract四款商用图像模型能把假主张画成可信证据。

    EpiReal-Bench 用来量商用图像生成器会不会把虚假现实主张画成可信视觉证据。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  13. 研究:叙事包装可跨语言绕过 LLM 拒答

    提出 GUISE 基准与 AXIS 训练,防御叙事包装越狱

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-1.7B, Qwen3-4B, GLM-4-9B
    AbstractGUISE 分开测包装与语域。

    作者测量叙事包装下的拒答失效,并训练一个在未见包装上拒绝、同时仍回答同风格良性请求的适配器。问题是:安全对齐模型拒绝直说的有害请求,却回答嵌进角色或叙事里的同一请求。文言文被用来把语域和包装拆开。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  14. PatchBench 提出激活补丁局部评测协议,揭示越狱修复的附带损伤

    提出 PatchBench-Local 协议,评测激活补丁修复越狱的局部附带损伤

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct, gemma-3-4b-it and others8

    Abstract论文提出 PatchBench 与局部评估协议,揭示了激活补丁在全局能力无损下仍存局部良性退化。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  15. 研究:九种 LLM 说服力评测方法排名仅弱相关

    适配多种已发表说服评测并比较模型排名

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Claude-Fable-5.1, GPT-5.6-Sol, Kimi-K2.6 and others15
    Abstract说服分数混合能力与意愿,换任务后同一模型的排名可以差很多。

    这项研究比较的是自动化说服评测是否一致,而不是哪一种分数更正确。

    Paper analysisRead analysis