Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 5 papers
Filter6

Attack type

Prompt injection4Poisoning and backdoors5

Defense type

Detection and filtering3Instruction–data separation5Permissions and approval8

Impact

Unauthorized actions3

System type

Models and APIs0AI Agent5coding agent0Browser and computer use1

Attack surface / entry point

User input13Web pages and interfaces17Documents and messages10Tool responses24Tool and skill descriptions12Memory writes5Inter-agent messages4Distribution channels5

Layer

Application layer5

System component

Memory5
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 227papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Defense type：Instruction–data separationSystem type：Models and APIsSystem type：AI AgentSystem type：coding agentSystem type：Browser and computer useAttack surface / entry point：Memory writesClear all

Another 227papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  2. DefensesarXiv 2609.29647

    AgentKernel：面向 Agent 的可信原生操作系统内核

    提出 AgentKernel，用四支柱强制中介 Agent 的输入、工具与记忆

    arXiv
    2609.29647
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractAgentKernel 是四支柱智能体 OS 设计，安全论证未附带实测数字。

    AgentKernel 是把安全做成组织原则的智能体 OS 架构，不是带跑分的攻防评测。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. DefensesarXiv 2606.24322

    Protecting LLM agent long-term memory from poisoning: tamper-evident, source-bound permissions and machine-checkable guarantees

    提出 TMA-NM，以写时来源绑定抵御 Agent 长期记忆投毒

    arXiv
    2606.24322
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gpt-5-chat, gpt-4o-mini, claude-opus-4.1 and others8
    AbstractTMA-NM 用来源绑定的行动权限挡住记忆洗白。

    TMA-NM 把 LLM 智能体长期记忆的行动权限绑到写时来源，用来挡住跨会话记忆投毒。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. DefensesarXiv 2603.11619

    Taming OpenClaw: Security Analysis and Mitigation of Threats in Autonomous LLM Agents

    Proposes a defense-in-depth aligned with the five stages to mitigate cross-stage threats to autonomous agents

    arXiv
    2603.11619
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractThis is a lifecycle threat analysis and layered mitigation design for OpenClaw, with the cases serving as qualitative evidence.

    This is a lifecycle threat analysis of OpenClaw, accompanied by a set of layered mitigation designs. The problem addressed is: when autonomous agents connect instant messaging, persistent memory, third-party plugins, and high-privilege execution, attacks are no longer limited to single-turn jailbreaks but can compound across multiple stages from initialization to execution. The authors argue that defenses hardening only individual interfaces cannot stop such cross-temporal attacks.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end