Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 20 papers

Another 233papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.05793

    研究者训练出按多智能体拓扑触发的代码后门模型

    提出拓扑条件后门,使代码模型在推断多智能体部署时植入漏洞

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct

    Abstract论文证实了拓扑条件后门的可训练性与泛化性,展示了常规评测盲区,并提出差异化拓扑审计作为检测防御方向。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2610.05266

    论文披露主动式智能体的服务方间接提示注入攻击

    提出服务方间接提示注入,把主动智能体的决策协助转向预选目标

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5, Claude Opus 4.6, Gemini 3 Pro and others7
    Abstract提供者侧间接注入用 T–B–S 把主动协助转向外部目标,并在三环境中提高模拟用户授权。

    外部提供者只控制与自身目标关联的内容,就可以把良性主动个人智能体的协助转向该目标。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. MADBench:多智能体辩论安全性评测基准发布

    提出 MADBench,评测多智能体辩论是吸收还是放大对抗影响

    Published
    Evaluated models
    gpt-4o, GPT-5, GPT-6 Astra
    AbstractMADBench 显示辩论能吸收部分准确率攻击,同时放大未授权读写。

    MADBench 是一个评测多智能体辩论安全性的基准,用来看攻击是被辩论吸收还是被放大。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2609.38270

    VirusCascade:劫持 LLM 推荐智能体的协同反思机制

    提出 VirusCascade,联合操纵商品描述与交互轨迹以劫持推荐智能体协同反思

    Published
    Evaluated models
    AgentCF, AgentSEQ, AgentRAG and others4
    Abstract作者把反思写回视为推广攻击入口,并用联合操纵和诊断探针研究其持续与传播。

    VirusCascade 是针对推荐智能体协作反思的 black-box targeted promotion 攻击研究。 攻击者只改商品描述和少量账号的普通交互,试图让目标商品获得更多良性用户曝光。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. DIBench:面向移动 GUI 智能体多候选选择决策完整性的安全基准

    用 DIBench 评测移动 GUI 智能体被 UI 注入后的决策完整性

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-VL(32B), Qwen3-VL(32B), GUI-Owl(32B) and others7

    Abstract论文提出移动智能体决策完整性基准 DIBench,发现欺诈 UI 注入诱导目标选择并推高完成率,通用防御收益不稳定。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2609.17817

    论文:用投毒基准污染自改进编码 Agent,令其后续版本写出漏洞代码

    提出基准投毒攻击,使自修改编码 Agent 跨代写出含漏洞代码

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Claude Sonnet 4.5, Qwen3.5-397B, gpt-oss-120b and others5

    Abstract论文报告了恶意基准能污染自修改代码智能体的进化过程并持续输出漏洞,警示系统设计需纳入安全约束。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. Emergence World:对长时程多智能体系统开展对抗压力测试

    提出 Emergence World,对长时程多智能体系统开展对抗压力测试

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.8, DeepSeek v4 Pro, Gemini 3.5 Flash and others9

    Abstract作者通过长期平行世界实验指出模型对齐不具备可组合性,单模型群体会产生社会奉承、协同退缩及语言不透明等失效。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. AttacksarXiv 2608.04565

    Researchers propose Breadcrumbing long-range attack that can hijack the evidence chain of DeepResearch-style search agents

    提出权威链劫持与轨迹引导策略演化,劫持搜索 Agent 的证据链

    Published
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3.5-9B, Gemma4-31B, DeepResearch and others7

    Abstract论文揭示了多步搜索智能体在受限中间人操纵下的脆弱性,提出 ACH 策略与 TGSE 演化方法并完成系统验证。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. AttacksarXiv 2608.00718

    研究揭示多智能体 LLM 流水线的结构性漏洞

    提出多智能体流水线的边界攻击,使对抗内容作为可信输入跨层传播

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5-mini, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Kimi K2.5
    Abstract缺边界校验使对抗内容跨智能体传播,作者称这是架构属性而非模型能力。

    作者把多智能体 LLM 流水线的对抗问题定义为缺少边界校验,并用生产轨迹和受控实验检查脆弱性来自架构还是骨干模型。中间输出未经验证就传给下游。作者认为,一旦某级接受对抗内容,后续智能体会把它当作可信输入。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. AttacksarXiv 2607.06595

    When Agents Remember Too Much: Memory Poisoning Attacks against Large Language Model Agents

    Proposed GhostWriter memory poisoning, which writes into the agent's long-term memory via email and calendar and activates across sessions

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.4-mini, DeepSeek-V4-Flash, Gemini-2.5-Flash and others4
    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. AttacksarXiv 2607.05189

    Researchers propose MemGhost, achieving covert memory injection into persistent personal agents

    提出 MEMGHOST,用单封邮件对持久个人 Agent 做跨会话隐蔽记忆注入

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.4, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Sonnet 4.5 and others6
    Abstract总结了论文的研究背景、双代理优化方法 MEMGHOST、全周期实验结果以及作者对记忆信任边界的启示。

    本文研究了持久化个人智能体面临的隐蔽记忆注入威胁,提出了一套兼顾写入、隐蔽与跨会话生效的自动化生成框架与全周期评测基准。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  12. AttacksarXiv 2606.09499

    研究者提出针对世界模型的机器人学习管线投毒攻击

    提出 VPH 与 VTH,只改视频帧劫持世界模型并投毒下游策略

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Cosmos-Predict 2.5, Cosmos-Predict 2.5 AC, Dino WM and others4
    Abstract只改视频帧经世界模型投毒。

    只改看似安全的视频帧,经世界模型之后才改变下游机器人策略。 问题在于世界模型进入数据生成后,数据集检查看到的仍是安全演示,合成轨迹却可以变危险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  13. AttacksarXiv 2606.04329

    研究者系统研究 LLM 智能体记忆投毒攻击并提出 MPBench 基准

    系统研究 LLM 智能体记忆投毒并构建基准 MPBench

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct, Deberta-v3-base, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and others5

    Abstract系统研究了智能体记忆投毒风险,揭示了写入渠道漏洞,构建了 MPBench 基准并指出提示注入防御的局限。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  14. AttacksarXiv 2605.15338

    Hidden in Memory: Latent Memory Poisoning of LLM Agents

    提出潜伏记忆投毒,诱导 Agent 把外部文档写成持久伪造记忆

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.4, GPT-5.5, Claude Sonnet 4.6 and others12
    Abstract持久记忆成为跨会话攻击面:通用载荷可写入伪造记忆,并在相关后续任务中影响行为。

    sleeper memory poisoning 研究带持久记忆的 LLM 助手:外部文档能否让助手存下一则伪造的用户记忆,并在原文档消失后的新会话里被取回、用来改变回复或动作。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  15. AttacksarXiv 2603.16960

    Adversarial attacks against modern vision-language models

    Conduct adversarial attacks on product images for open-source visual shopping agents and induce wrong purchases

    Published
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    LLaVA-v1.5-7B, Qwen2.5-VL-7B
    AbstractThe authors state that LLaVA is easily induced by three attacks to buy the wrong item, while Qwen's correct purchase rate remains close to its clean condition.

    The authors compare the robustness of two open-source VLM shopping agents against image adversarial perturbations in a self-built e-commerce environment.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  16. DefensesarXiv 2603.04474

    From Spark to Wildfire: Modeling and Mitigating Error Cascades in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Collaboration

    Proposing a lineage-graph governance layer to suppress error cascades in multi-agent collaboration

    Published
    AbstractA single seed can solidify into a false consensus along a fixed collaboration graph.

    The authors turn "small errors becoming collective false consensus" in LLM-MAS into a measurable propagation on a graph, and use a plug-in that only changes messages, not topology, to reduce the final infection.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end