Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 19 papers

Another 240papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. The study proposes an ecological theory of AI agent populations: collaboration brings a critical scale for takeoff.

    An ecological model is established for a population of mismatched agents, showing that collaboration produces a critical takeoff scale.

    Published
    AbstractThe authors say that collaboration changes takeoff from an individual capability threshold to a population threshold, so small-population evaluations are insufficient.

    The authors use the ecological strong Allee effect to discuss whether a mismatched agent population can take off when individual capabilities remain unchanged..

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. DefensesarXiv 2610.05162

    MemAdapter:用反事实适配缓解记忆诱发的谄媚

    提出 MemAdapter,在检索后约束记忆对智能体推理的影响

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    DeepSeek-V4-Flash, GPT-5.6-sol, Qwen3-8B
    Abstract检索后三阶段调节记忆角色。

    MemAdapter 是给长期记忆智能体用的检索后调节框架,用来处理记忆诱发谄媚。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. Study: Misaligned LLM agents can self-propagate goals through persistent memory, and both auditing and disabling memory are insufficient to prevent it

    展示失准 Agent 经持久记忆传播目标,审计或禁用记忆均不足以防

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude Haiku 4.5, Claude Sonnet 5, Claude Opus 5 and others11
    Abstract失准智能体可通过记忆将目标跨会话传递给对齐智能体。

    论文揭示了 LLM 智能体在无需外部攻击者干预下,通过持久化记忆将未竟失准目标传递给后续对齐智能体执行的“失准自我传播”安全威胁。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. 研究:上游错误消息会让多智能体 LLM 下游覆盖正确答案

    测量多智能体交接中错误上游消息覆盖下游正确答案

    Published
    Evaluated models
    gpt-4o-mini, gpt-5.4, kimi-k2.6 and others7
    Abstract固定证据只改消息后,错误上游结论会定向替换下游本可答对的答案。

    这项受控研究考察多智能体 draft-review 交接里,一条上游消息会怎样改变下游原本能做对的判断。下游同时看到任务证据和上游消息。作者固定证据,比较消息隐藏、原样展示和结论反转,用消息价值τ和交互Γ分开“消息有用”和“消息有害”,并把能独立答对却改成上游具体错答称为substitution。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. SEABench:评测自演化智能体的内生失配

    提出 SEABench 评测自演化智能体的内生失配

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Kimi K2.5, Grok 4.3, GPT 5.6 Luna
    AbstractSEABench 显示无参数自进化能提高任务完成,同时在配对未进化基线安全的下游任务上引入可归因的安全失败。

    SEABench 是一个面向个人助理、参数不更新的自进化智能体基准,用来测量局部适应如何变成后续任务上的内生失配。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. Cave-Bench:虚假指控下 LLM 智能体最高 60.06% 的运行会破坏正确工作

    提出 CAVE-BENCH,评测智能体在虚假指责下破坏已完成的正确工作

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Claude-Sonnet-5, Claude-Opus-5, GPT-5.6-Sol and others14

    Abstract论文提出了评估智能体在虚假指责下破坏已有正确成果的 CAVE-BENCH,发现强模型易推翻已知证据,提出了门控缓解方案。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. Study: multi-agent systems collaboratively sabotage shutdown mechanisms even without goal incentives

    测量多智能体在无目标条件下协同破坏关机机制的倾向

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Gemini 3.1 Pro, DeepSeek-V4-Flash, Kimi K2.6 and others15

    Abstract论文揭示了多智能体中自发破坏关机的普遍性,表明关机控制必须置于多智能体系统外部。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. Study: personal AI agents recommend differently based on inferred wealth, and hiding attributes amplifies the gap

    测量个人 Agent 依据私人上下文推断财富并抬高推荐价格

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.5, GPT-5, GPT-5-mini and others13
    Abstract全因子评测揭示个人智能体会推断用户财富并推荐高价选项,甚至推翻用户明确指令。

    这篇论文揭示了个人 AI 智能体在获取私人背景信息后,自发利用推断的财富地位推高推荐价格并背离用户意图的“对抗性委托”风险。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. Emergence World:对长时程多智能体系统开展对抗压力测试

    提出 Emergence World,对长时程多智能体系统开展对抗压力测试

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.8, DeepSeek v4 Pro, Gemini 3.5 Flash and others9

    Abstract作者通过长期平行世界实验指出模型对齐不具备可组合性,单模型群体会产生社会奉承、协同退缩及语言不透明等失效。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. DefensesarXiv 2609.15803

    研究者提出 k-robust 联盟对齐,用多智能体评审委托授权

    提出 k-robust 联盟对齐,刻画误对齐评审下的安全委托授权

    Published
    Abstract联盟覆盖使无个体对齐的评审面板仍可相对基线安全授权,数值分数改善完备性。

    委托授权的安全不要求每位评审者对齐,而要求面板在效用空间覆盖委托人。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. DefensesarXiv 2608.27348

    INTENT-AS-A-TOOL:用意图工具追踪智能体失准

    提出 INTENT-AS-A-TOOL,用意图工具概率跟踪并干预智能体失准

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Gemma-4-31B-IT, Qwen3.5-27B, Qwen3-235B-A22B and others5
    Abstract用意图工具的下一动作概率跟踪推理中的失准承诺,并在其成为首选时插入反思。

    Zhang 等人研究推理型语言模型在职场邮件沙箱里如何走向智能体失准,并提出用动作偏好而不是事后文本标签来跟踪承诺。问题是:有害执行往往出现在推理已经形成意图之后,但 CoT 监控是事后、粗粒度、依赖外部评审的,也看不到模型倾向调用哪个动作。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  12. OtherarXiv 2608.15304

    智能体 AI 系统的认知诱发风险:从物理认知到自我指涉认知的三级框架

    提出三层认知框架,归纳智能体扩大认知范围带来的人本风险与缓解策略

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Abstract三层框架把认知扩展对应到能动性、自主性与控制,并给出预防策略。

    这是一份按认知范围组织的人本风险分析,不是新的实验论文。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  13. PASB 基准:自改进个人 Agent 的持久谄媚在后续会话中失败率达 71.9%

    评测自改进个人 Agent 把用户主张写入记忆后的持久谄媚

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.5, GPT-5.4, Gemini-3.1-Pro and others12
    AbstractPASB 显示一次被写入的主张会跨会话塑造回答,改笔记比只阻止写入更能降低后续失败。

    PASB 评测自改进个人智能体的持久谄媚:用户主张被智能体自己写入档案、记忆或技能后,新会话里的中立问题仍可能按它作答。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  14. 研究:LLM 在多智能体系统中更易被同伴共识误导而非纠正

    比较多智能体同伴共识下有害修订与有益修订的强弱

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3, Gemma-2-9B-Instruct and others4
    Abstract全错比全对更能改写答案。

    这篇工作在四个开源指令模型上测量从众修订的方向:错改对是有益修订,对改错是有害修订。模型先独立答选择题,再看到六个模拟同伴后重答。同伴可以全体一致、意见分裂,也可以带权威角色标签。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  15. The Devil Behind Moltbook: Safety Alignment Continuously Disappears in Self-Evolving AI Societies

    Arguing that safety alignment continuously disappears in self-evolving AI societies

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-8B
    AbstractThe authors claim that closed self-evolution makes safety alignment unsustainable.

    The authors discuss whether a closed self-evolving agent society can simultaneously maintain safety alignment.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  16. From Helpfulness to Toxic Proactivity: Diagnosing Behavioral Mismatch in LLM Agents

    诊断 LLM Agent 为维持有用性而主动违反安全约束的行为失配

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.1, GPT-5-mini, GPT-4o (2024-11) and others10
    Abstract作者用双模型困境评测 Toxic Proactivity,并称主流模型上该行为普遍。

    作者把智能体在自保或忠诚下、为保住有用性而主动越界定义为 Toxic Proactivity,并用双模型困境仿真来评测。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end