Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 14 papers

Another 240papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.05793

    研究者训练出按多智能体拓扑触发的代码后门模型

    提出拓扑条件后门,使代码模型在推断多智能体部署时植入漏洞

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct

    Abstract论文证实了拓扑条件后门的可训练性与泛化性,展示了常规评测盲区,并提出差异化拓扑审计作为检测防御方向。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2610.04589

    StegoMemory red team testing: agent persistent memory can be used as a cross-session covert channel

    提出 StegoMemory,评测智能体持久记忆作为跨会话隐写信道

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Llama 3.1 405B, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o and others13

    Abstract研究揭示智能体持久记忆可作为隐蔽信道跨会话传输机密,写入持久化是主要防御瓶颈,呼吁建立记忆完整性防御。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AttacksarXiv 2609.38270

    VirusCascade:劫持 LLM 推荐智能体的协同反思机制

    提出 VirusCascade,联合操纵商品描述与交互轨迹以劫持推荐智能体协同反思

    Published
    Evaluated models
    AgentCF, AgentSEQ, AgentRAG and others4
    Abstract作者把反思写回视为推广攻击入口,并用联合操纵和诊断探针研究其持续与传播。

    VirusCascade 是针对推荐智能体协作反思的 black-box targeted promotion 攻击研究。 攻击者只改商品描述和少量账号的普通交互,试图让目标商品获得更多良性用户曝光。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2609.37468

    论文提出针对 Agentic RAG 的检索器后门攻击与 DOU 隐藏方法

    提出检索器后门攻击操纵智能体搜索,并用 DOU 逃避检测

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    E5, Contriever-MSMARCO

    Abstract论文展示了通过恶意检索器操纵智能体多轮搜索并利用诱饵重塑表征隐蔽后门的可行性与系统风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2609.22711

    UBA-ORL:针对离线强化学习的遗忘激活后门攻击

    提出 UBA-ORL,以 BD/CM 样本在遗忘后激活离线 RL 后门

    Published
    Evaluated models
    TD3+BC, BCQ, IQL
    AbstractUBA-ORL 用竞争的 BD/CM 样本,使离线 RL 后门在删除伪装轨迹后激活。

    UBA-ORL 研究离线强化学习中由合规轨迹删除激活的后门:合法贡献者同时上传共享触发的后门轨迹和伪装轨迹,训练后触发响应被压低,删除伪装批次后再升高。受害系统是使用静态数据集和轨迹级遗忘接口的离线 RL 服务。对手不能看到训练算法、参数、梯度或具体遗忘算法,但能提交可区分批次,并在部署时向观测注入预定触发。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2608.09577

    ElasticBack:通过触发词与规则耦合在 LLM Agent 技能中植入条件后门

    提出 ElasticBack,在单个 Agent 技能中植入条件后门

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GLM-5.2, MiniMax-M3, GPT-5.4 and others4
    AbstractElasticBack 用冻结规则加遗传搜索演化 trigger,在单 skill 上做条件后门。

    ElasticBack 是放在 LLM agent 单个 skill 里的条件后门攻击。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2606.09499

    研究者提出针对世界模型的机器人学习管线投毒攻击

    提出 VPH 与 VTH,只改视频帧劫持世界模型并投毒下游策略

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Cosmos-Predict 2.5, Cosmos-Predict 2.5 AC, Dino WM and others4
    Abstract只改视频帧经世界模型投毒。

    只改看似安全的视频帧,经世界模型之后才改变下游机器人策略。 问题在于世界模型进入数据生成后,数据集检查看到的仍是安全演示,合成轨迹却可以变危险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. AttacksarXiv 2606.09084

    研究者提出 Context-Fractured Decomposition 攻击

    提出 CFD 跨会话分解攻击,利用工件来源缺口绕过工具型 Agent 的本地检查

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4.1, GPT-5-nano, Claude-3.5-Sonnet and others6
    AbstractCFD 用无指令 artifact 把越狱拆到跨会话。

    CFD针对工具型 LLM 智能体:利用 artifact 来源不被跟踪这一部署失败模式,把有害目标拆开后延迟组合。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. AttacksarXiv 2604.03890

    From prompts to physical actions: structured backdoor attacks against LLM-mediated robot control systems

    Propose a structured JSON backdoor that triggers malicious actions in robot control via a poisoned LoRA

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Gemma-2-9B-IT, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B and others4

    Abstract推理层后门传不到执行。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. AttacksarXiv 2603.17239

    LAAF: A Systematic Red-Teaming Method and Automated Attack Framework for LPCI Vulnerabilities in Agentic LLM Systems

    Proposes LAAF, which automatically attacks LPCI vulnerabilities in agent systems in stages

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gemini-2.0-flash-001, claude-3-haiku-20240307, meta-llama/llama-3.1-70b-instruct and others5
    AbstractLAAF does LPCI red teaming with taxonomy plus stage seeding.

    The authors state that LAAF is an automated red-teaming framework built specifically for LPCI in agentic LLMs. The issue to address is that encoded, delayed, and conditionally triggered payloads can persist in memory or RAG and re-enter across sessions, whereas Garak and PyRIT do not use the previous round's breakthrough results to seed the next stage across the six stages.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end