Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.
Oct 12 · Monday
Another 247 papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
“
About this collection Collection in progress We are building a large AI safety paper collection to help researchers find work related to their interests. Papers are collected automatically andfiltered only for relevance to AI safety , without judging quality, novelty or reading value. The default “Annotated first” shows papers with tags or published paper analyses first. Each group is ordered by original publication date, newest first, with undated papers last. “Newest first” uses publication dates only. This order is not a quality ranking.
One-line summaries, tags and paper analyses are prepared by AI from the papers. Language models may have systematic biases and produce hallucinations.We plan to carry out human annotation and review to reduce errors in this content.
测量有损投机解码的安全代价,并提出 SecureSD 收紧早期验证
Published Oct 7
Evaluated models Qwen3-8B , Qwen3-32B , Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and others6 Abstract 有损推测解码的早期偏离更快抬高越狱与注入风险。作者研究有损推测解码在换取速度时,是否会比效用更快地损害越狱与提示注入防护,并给出按位置校正的 SecureSD。
提出 CGMIA,检测代码生成基准样本是否泄漏进训练集
Published Sep 9
Evaluated models Qwen2.5-Coder (3B) , CodeGemma (2B) , DeepSeek-Coder (1.3B) and others5 Abstract CGMIA 融合相似度、通过率、困惑度与 CodeBERT,在模拟泄漏上优于八个 MIA 基线。CGMIA 用成员推断检测代码生成基准是否泄入 LLM 训练集,使评测不依赖对训练语料的直接访问。
You have reached the end