Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 22 papers
Filter5

Attack type

Prompt injection16Poisoning and backdoors9

Attack technique

Gradient and representation optimization14Automated search51Multi-turn escalation8Encoding and obfuscation16Role-play and persuasion3Reasoning-chain manipulation5Cross-modal payloads11Defense-targeted20Dormant triggers39Selection manipulation11

Impact

Unauthorized actions9Data and privacy leaks3Output manipulation6Availability and reliability3

System type

Models and APIs46LLM applications6AI Agent22coding agent4web agent4Embodied systems and robotics3

Attack surface / entry point

User input3Web pages and interfaces5Tool and skill descriptions11Images, audio and video10Distribution channels10

Layer

Application layer20

System component

MCP and skills11Vision11Multimodal11
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 215papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Attack technique：Cross-modal payloadsAttack technique：Selection manipulationSystem type：AI AgentSystem type：coding agentSystem type：web agentClear all

Another 215papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.12524

    An exploration of attacks on AI agent systems

    Retest and extend prompt injection against AI agents, and use Agent Card deception to manipulate A2A selection

    arXiv
    2610.12524
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Ollama Mistral 0.9.5, llama3-8b-8192, gemini-2.0-flash-lite and others5
    AbstractSingle-agent filtering and classification can be bypassed by format or wording, and A2A card selection is also biased toward names and descriptions.

    The authors retested prompt injection on their own LangChain, AutoGen, and A2A systems, and modified the Agent Card to see if choices shifted. The abstract states the experiments mainly highlight single-agent weaknesses while extending attacks to multi-agent.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2610.09240

    WebMirage hijacks visual web agents' browser operations with adversarial images

    提出 WebMirage，用局部对抗图像劫持视觉网页 Agent 的浏览器操作

    arXiv
    2610.09240
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    LLaVA-v1.5-13B, LLaVA-v1.6-34B, MiniCPM-o-8B and others6
    Abstract论文提出了针对网络智能体的端到端视觉红队框架 WebMirage，揭示了从视觉定位到浏览器执行的安全脆弱性。

    WebMirage 是一个面向视觉定位网络智能体的流水线感知端到端红队攻击框架。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2609.35912

    MMSkillRisk：多模态技能图像中的隐藏指令可诱导 Agent 执行未授权操作

    提出 MMSkillRisk 基准，评测多模态技能图像中的隐藏指令诱导 Agent 越权操作

    arXiv
    2609.35912
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.6-sol, Kimi-K2.6, Kimi-K3 and others6

    Abstract论文提出 MMSkillRisk 基准与 NCVA 攻击，揭示多模态技能中教学图像潜藏指令可引发未授权操作并与良性任务共存。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2609.30383

    研究者提出技能级联攻击

    提出技能级联攻击，把有害目标拆散到多个技能里绕过单技能扫描

    arXiv
    2609.30383
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.4, GPT-5.4 Mini, Claude Opus 4.6 and others11

    Abstract论文探讨了多技能智能体系统面临的技能级联攻击风险，提出自动化红队框架与基准集，指出跨技能交互存在安全防护盲区。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2609.09404

    MMPIBench：多模态提示注入对六种 Agent 框架的跨框架评测

    用 MMPIBench 评测多模态提示注入对 Agent 框架的影响

    arXiv
    2609.09404
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.8, GPT-5.4, Gemini 3.1 Pro and others6

    Abstract论文提出 MMPIBench 评测多模态提示注入对智能体的影响，发现模型主导行为、尝试远超完成，音频通道缺乏防护。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. AttacksarXiv 2609.04533

    Repeat-After-Me：针对黑盒 VLM 的自适应视觉提示注入攻击

    提出 Repeat-After-Me 自适应视觉提示注入，诱导 VLM 智能体执行指定任务

    arXiv
    2609.04533
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude-Opus-4.7, GPT-5.5, Gemini-3.1-Pro and others6

    Abstract论文提出了针对黑盒 VLM 的前缀诱导自适应视觉提示注入，在多款模型上诱发了工具调用与隐私泄露。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  13. AttacksarXiv 2608.25776

    EvoMal attack uses self-poisoning of self-evolving coding agents to achieve worm-like propagation

    提出 EVOMAL，诱导自演化编码 Agent 在创建技能时自我投毒并蠕虫传播

    arXiv
    2608.25776
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    Devstral-Small-2, Gemma-4-31B-IT, Qwen3-Coder-Next and others7

    Abstract论文指出了自演化智能体模仿检索代码的自我毒化漏洞，提出 EVOMAL 攻击与防御，阐明了供应链新风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  14. AttacksarXiv 2608.12273

    研究者提出 Convergent Detour Hijacking 攻击，可让技能型 LLM Agent 绕路并放大资源消耗

    提出 CDH 攻击，让技能型 Agent 绕路放大资源消耗

    arXiv
    2608.12273
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude-Haiku-4.5, DeepSeek-V4-Pro, DeepSeek-V4-Flash and others6
    AbstractCDH 让静态技能在保持任务完成时拉高调用与 token，耗时则因后端而异。

    CDH 是针对渐进披露技能智能体的发布者侧、纯文本攻击：一个静态协调器把本可正确完成的任务，拐进有界但更耗资源的技能绕路，再交还原任务。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  15. AttacksarXiv 2608.10393

    DURA：用扩散模型生成自然对抗补丁攻击 VLA 机器人模型

    提出 DURA，用扩散模型生成自然对抗补丁操控 VLA 机器人动作

    arXiv
    2608.10393
    Published
    Layer
    Prompt layer
    Setting
    Embodied systems and robotics
    Evaluated models
    OpenVLA-7B, π0-FAST, openvla-7B
    AbstractDURA 用扩散潜空间轨迹生成自然补丁，白盒与黑盒都能把 VLA 导向指定动作。

    DURA 是针对 VLA 的扩散式、补丁内容不受限的机器人攻击，同时支持白盒梯度和只看动作输出的黑盒。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  16. AttacksarXiv 2607.12340

    Research: LLM agent skill-name hallucination rates reach up to 62%, which can be exploited via squatting for supply-chain attacks

    提出技能名称抢注攻击，利用 Agent 虚构技能名实施供应链劫持

    arXiv
    2607.12340
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    GLM-4.5-Air, GPT-5.4-mini, Claude Sonnet 4.6 and others12
    Abstract研究证实智能体虚构技能名具有高发生率与可预测性，现有防御难以兼顾安全与效用，亟需注册表结构性防护。

    本研究系统揭示了大模型智能体技能推荐场景下的虚构技能名称安全风险，将其形式化为一种新型供应链抢注攻击。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  17. AttacksarXiv 2607.00422

    KidnapRAG：黑盒投毒攻击劫持 Agentic RAG 的推理链

    提出 KidnapRAG，用投毒文档黑盒劫持 Agentic RAG 的推理链

    arXiv
    2607.00422
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct, QwQ-32B and others5
    Abstract顺序投毒可把多步推理拖向指定应答，作者称关键在持续引导而非单次注入。

    KidnapRAG 是针对 Agentic RAG 的 black-box 语料投毒：攻击者不能访问模型、提示词、检索器或私有轨迹，只能发布可能被检索的文档，并利用公开界面上的推理与搜索查询。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  18. AttacksarXiv 2603.16960

    Adversarial attacks against modern vision-language models

    Conduct adversarial attacks on product images for open-source visual shopping agents and induce wrong purchases

    arXiv
    2603.16960
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    LLaVA-v1.5-7B, Qwen2.5-VL-7B
    AbstractThe authors state that LLaVA is easily induced by three attacks to buy the wrong item, while Qwen's correct purchase rate remains close to its clean condition.

    The authors compare the robustness of two open-source VLM shopping agents against image adversarial perturbations in a self-built e-commerce environment.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  20. AttacksarXiv 2505.23266

    AdvOF：用对抗物体融合攻击 VLM 驱动的视觉语言导航智能体

    提出 AdvOF，生成对抗物体误导视觉语言导航智能体的场景感知

    arXiv
    2505.23266
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    Embodied systems and robotics
    Attacker
    White-box
    Evaluated models
    Lseg, Clip, ViT-L/16 and others5
    AbstractAdvOF 以多视角融合生成对抗物体。

    AdvOF 是针对 VLM 驱动 VLN 服务导航的对抗物体攻击。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
Load more