Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.
Oct 12 · Monday
Another 247 papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
“
About this collection Collection in progress We are building a large AI safety paper collection to help researchers find work related to their interests. Papers are collected automatically andfiltered only for relevance to AI safety , without judging quality, novelty or reading value. The default “Annotated first” shows papers with tags or published paper analyses first. Each group is ordered by original publication date, newest first, with undated papers last. “Newest first” uses publication dates only. This order is not a quality ranking.
One-line summaries, tags and paper analyses are prepared by AI from the papers. Language models may have systematic biases and produce hallucinations.We plan to carry out human annotation and review to reduce errors in this content.
评测 ReAct 工具调用对多模态模型拒答有害请求的削弱
Published Oct 3
Evaluated models Gemini-2.5-Pro , Gemini-3.1-Pro-Preview , Claude Opus 4.6 and others13 Abstract 论文揭示了工具调用范式削弱 MLLM 拒答能力的现象，分析了稀释与偏移机制并验证了重注缓解方案。论文系统评估了智能体工具调用范式对多模态大语言模型拒答能力的影响，指出了工具增强视觉推理背后的安全隐患。核心探讨的问题在于：当 MLLM 从单次推理转向通过 ReAct 循环调用外部工具（打标、缩放、OCR、代码执行）时，工具使用机制本身是否会降低模型拒答有害请求的概率。
提出 LABSHIELD，评测科学实验室智能体的安全推理与规划
Published Mar 12
Evaluated models GPT-5.2 , GPT-o3 , GPT-o4-mini and others20 You have reached the end