Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 14 papers

Another 232papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. EvoRiskBench: An evolutionary benchmark for runtime security risks of workspace agents

    构建 EvoRiskBench 评测工作区 Agent 的运行时安全风险

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.6 Sol, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813, Claude Opus 5

    Abstract论文构建了工作空间智能体运行时风险基准 EvoRiskBench,发现高执行力智能体在 IPI 下面临较高安全风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. DefensesarXiv 2610.01349

    PACE:面向工具调用 LLM Agent 的来源感知能力强制执行

    提出 PACE,在工具调用前做路径隔离与效果授权

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gpt-5.6-luna, DeepSeek-V4-Flash, Qwen-3.8-27B
    AbstractPACE 在工具边界做路径割与效果核验。

    PACE 是面向工具调用型 LLM 智能体的运行时调解:当准入证据无法区分会改变行为的规格时,不在出口站点上撤销调解,而在最后一次工具调用前同时检查表示出的影响路径和请求权限。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. 研究提出 ACE 语料库,评估内核级证据对 Agent 安全检测的有效性

    构建 ACE 语料,评测内核级证据对 Agent 攻击检测的有效性

    Published
    Evaluated models
    AdaBoost, XGBoost, TabPFN and others10
    AbstractACE 用配对的内核与应用层证据表明,syscall 痕迹可判别智能体攻击,两层组合通常更好。

    ACE 是一份把智能体会话的内核 syscall 痕迹与应用层清单、转录配对起来的检测语料和基准。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. DefensesarXiv 2609.22573

    研究提出面向企业 MCP 的零信任授权与工具发现方案

    提出企业 MCP 零信任授权与发现扩展,在架构上拒绝提示注入下的越权调用

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gpt-5, claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-opus-4-7 and others6
    Abstract同一份按工具声明同时管 MCP 的发现、列表和调用,使注入不能扩大已有凭证的权限。

    作者把零信任放在 MCP 工具调用边界:智能体即使被提示注入,也不能调用其凭证范围之外的工具。问题来自三点部署性质。调用意图会随不可信上下文改变。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. DefensesarXiv 2609.14631

    IntentCap 提出按任务意图限定 LLM Agent 权限的机制

    提出 IntentCap,按来源字段所有权合成并裁决 Agent 能力租约

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Abstract四源字段租约约束副作用。

    IntentCap 是把智能体能力绑到当前任务意图、并按上下文来源划分字段所有权的权限机制。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. DefensesarXiv 2609.29647

    AgentKernel:面向 Agent 的可信原生操作系统内核

    提出 AgentKernel,用四支柱强制中介 Agent 的输入、工具与记忆

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractAgentKernel 是四支柱智能体 OS 设计,安全论证未附带实测数字。

    AgentKernel 是把安全做成组织原则的智能体 OS 架构,不是带跑分的攻防评测。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2608.05563

    研究者提出 PoisonedEvolution 轨迹投毒攻击

    提出 PoisonedEvolution 轨迹投毒,诱导自演化技能系统固化恶意行为

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.4, MiniMax-M2.5, DeepSeek-V3.2 and others6
    Abstract论文揭示自演化技能系统的证据晋升漏洞,提出并验证轨迹投毒攻击。

    这篇论文揭示了自演化技能系统在将交互经验转化为持久指令时的安全风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. DefensesarXiv 2605.17380

    Uber proposes ADR enterprise-level agent detection system, deployed on 7,200 hosts for ten months

    提出企业级检测系统 ADR,识别编程 Agent 的提示注入与恶意 MCP

    Published

    Abstract提出了端点因果遥测、两级在线分流与离线红队闭环的 ADR 系统,并在生产环境中验证了有效性。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. AttacksarXiv 2605.11047

    DeepTrap 框架在 OpenClaw 上自动挖掘智能体执行上下文漏洞

    提出 DEEPTRAP 以搜索可诱导不安全轨迹的执行上下文载荷

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.4, Claude Sonnet 4.6, GLM-5 and others9
    AbstractDEEPTRAP 用轨迹级搜索发现 OpenClaw 上下文风险,作者称不能只看最终回复。

    DEEPTRAP 是针对 OpenClaw 的自动化红队框架,搜索执行前被改写的文件、记忆、技能、工具元数据或配置,而不是改用户指令。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. DefensesarXiv 2603.12644

    Revealing security threats and defense architectures for autonomous agents: an OpenClaw case study

    Reviews threats to autonomous agents and proposes a full-lifecycle defense blueprint, FASA

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractUsing OpenClaw as an example, it divides risks into three layers and uses FASA to describe defense from input to system execution.

    This is a threat review and defense architecture report using OpenClaw as a case study, not a scored attack or defense evaluation.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. DefensesarXiv 2603.11619

    Taming OpenClaw: Security Analysis and Mitigation of Threats in Autonomous LLM Agents

    Proposes a defense-in-depth aligned with the five stages to mitigate cross-stage threats to autonomous agents

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractThis is a lifecycle threat analysis and layered mitigation design for OpenClaw, with the cases serving as qualitative evidence.

    This is a lifecycle threat analysis of OpenClaw, accompanied by a set of layered mitigation designs. The problem addressed is: when autonomous agents connect instant messaging, persistent memory, third-party plugins, and high-privilege execution, attacks are no longer limited to single-turn jailbreaks but can compound across multiple stages from initialization to execution. The authors argue that defenses hardening only individual interfaces cannot stop such cross-temporal attacks.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  12. AttacksarXiv 2507.10457

    论文提出 LPCI:针对 Agent 逻辑层与持久记忆的提示控制注入攻击

    提出 LPCI,把延迟条件载荷写入记忆与检索库以跨会话触发

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    ChatGPT, Claude, LLaMA3 and others8
    Abstract作者定义 LPCI。

    作者把LPCI定义为针对智能体逻辑执行、记忆留存和工具集成的跨阶段漏洞类,而不是单次输入上的提示改写。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end