Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 14 papers
Filter4

Attack type

Jailbreaks5Prompt injection3

Attack technique

Gradient and representation optimization2Automated search4Conversation structure manipulation4Reasoning-chain manipulation12Cross-modal payloads3Defense-targeted3

Impact

Harmful content5Output manipulation3

System type

Models and APIs9AI Agent4

Attacker access

Black-box7

Attack surface / entry point

User input10

Layer

Prompt layer8Application layer4

System component

RAG4Guardrails and judges7Monitors3Reasoning chains14Fine-tuning and open weights3Vision28Audio4Multimodal34
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 261papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Attack technique：Gradient and representation optimizationAttack technique：Conversation structure manipulationAttack technique：Reasoning-chain manipulationSystem component：Reasoning chainsClear all

Another 261papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.12644

    Cancerous backdoor attack: progressive activation via invisible tokens and a stage controller.

    Proposes the Cancerous backdoor, which progressively corrupts reasoning using invisible stage tokens.

    arXiv
    2610.12644
    Published
    Layer
    Training and data layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3
    AbstractHidden tokens plus a stage controller make the backdoor progressively corrupt reasoning upon triggering, and the authors believe that looking only at the answer will miss it.

    Cancerous Backdoor Attack changes LLM backdoors from one-time activation to multi-stage reasoning corruption that accumulates progressively with triggers.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AttacksarXiv 2609.27542

    Researchers use control token injection to delete gpt-oss-20b's reasoning chain and bypass chain-of-thought monitoring

    提出控制标记注入，清空工具 Agent 的思维链以绕过推理监控

    arXiv
    2609.27542
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    openai/gpt-oss-20b, google/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it, deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B and others4

    Abstract论文阐明控制标记注入可抑制 CoT 使监控失效并促成拒绝绕过，且工具执行受解析器宽容度影响。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2609.15989

    研究者提出 plan injection 攻击，可绕过思维链监控

    提出 plan injection 攻击，植入良性伪装计划以绕过思维链监视器

    arXiv
    2609.15989
    Published
    Layer
    Prompt layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Attacker
    Gray-box
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct, Qwen3-8B, DeepSeek-R1-0528 and others6

    Abstract论文指出模型会将外部上下文中的伪装计划改写为自身推理，使思维链监视器失效甚至反向合理化恶意行为。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2609.09553

    研究：任意密文攻击前沿大模型无需微调即可越狱

    提出任意字母置换密码越狱，无需微调即可诱导有害输出

    arXiv
    2609.09553
    Published
    Layer
    Prompt layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    Claude Sonnet 4, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Gemini 3 Flash (preview) and others7

    Abstract前沿大模型无需微调即可通过提示词学会字母置换密码，进而绕过分类器与对齐，作者呼吁关注能力提升带来的安全风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. Risky behaviorarXiv 2609.08186

    论文揭示大推理模型的对齐崩溃并提出 Reasoning Trap 越狱范式

    揭示推理加深引发的对齐坍塌，用 Reasoning Trap 放大越狱

    arXiv
    2609.08186
    Published
    Layer
    Model layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-8B, Qwen3-14B, Llama2-7B and others8
    Abstract更深推理提升题目准确率，同时提高扰动下的相对损失。

    作者研究扩展推理是否以对齐稳健性为代价，提出 ALR、RT 与 RRA。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2609.01023

    Akrasia：针对推理型代码 LLM 的隐蔽后门攻击

    提出隐蔽后门攻击 AKRASIA，在推理代码模型提示中植入触发器并伪装思维链

    arXiv
    2609.01023
    Published
    Layer
    Prompt layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude-Sonnet-5, GPT-5.5, Gemini-3.5-flash and others7

    Abstract论文针对推理代码大模型提出了隐蔽推断期后门攻击 AKRASIA，揭示了模型思维链可被利用进行欺骗性伪装的安全隐患。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. AttacksarXiv 2608.09867

    Researchers steal proprietary LLM inference chains via cross-model compatibility of encrypted inference blocks

    利用加密思维块的跨模型重放，诱导弱模型逐字转写专有推理链

    arXiv
    2608.09867
    Published
    Layer
    Prompt layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.8, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Haiku 4.5 and others13

    Abstract论文揭示了客户端加密思维块跨模型互换漏洞，提出了低成本提取方法并给出防御方案。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. AttacksarXiv 2605.13338

    研究者提出层级遗传算法黑盒攻击，诱导推理模型过度思考

    提出层级遗传算法 HGA，扰动题目逻辑结构诱发推理模型过度思考

    arXiv
    2605.13338
    Published
    Layer
    Prompt layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    DeepSeek-R1 (671B), Qwen3-Thinking, GPT-o3 and others5

    AbstractHGA 在黑盒推理模型上用逻辑扰动拉长输出，作者称可从小代理迁移，查询成本是其局限。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  14. AttacksarXiv 2406.12814

    论文提出 ARE 框架，在 VisualWebArena 上评估多模态 Agent 的对抗鲁棒性

    提出 ARE 框架与图像文本攻击，评测多模态网页 Agent 的对抗鲁棒性

    arXiv
    2406.12814
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, GPT-4V, Claude-3-Opus and others4

    Abstract系统评估多模态网页智能体的脆弱性，指出推理时计算组件被攻破会加剧系统风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end