Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 8 papers
Filter4

Attack type

Prompt injection3Detection evasion3

Attack technique

Automated search5Encoding and obfuscation3Role-play and persuasion3Conversation structure manipulation4Reasoning-chain manipulation14Cross-modal payloads3Defense-targeted4Dormant triggers5

System type

Models and APIs5AI Agent3

Attack surface / entry point

User input6

Layer

Prompt layer4

System component

MCP and skills8Guardrails and judges19Monitors6Reasoning chains7Permissions and sandboxing1Fine-tuning and open weights9Image generation3Multimodal4
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 232papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Attack technique：Conversation structure manipulationAttack technique：Defense-targetedSystem component：Reasoning chainsSystem component：Permissions and sandboxingClear all

Another 232papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.12644

    Cancerous backdoor attack: progressive activation via invisible tokens and a stage controller.

    Proposes the Cancerous backdoor, which progressively corrupts reasoning using invisible stage tokens.

    arXiv
    2610.12644
    Published
    Layer
    Training and data layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3
    AbstractHidden tokens plus a stage controller make the backdoor progressively corrupt reasoning upon triggering, and the authors believe that looking only at the answer will miss it.

    Cancerous Backdoor Attack changes LLM backdoors from one-time activation to multi-stage reasoning corruption that accumulates progressively with triggers.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2609.27542

    Researchers use control token injection to delete gpt-oss-20b's reasoning chain and bypass chain-of-thought monitoring

    提出控制标记注入，清空工具 Agent 的思维链以绕过推理监控

    arXiv
    2609.27542
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    openai/gpt-oss-20b, google/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it, deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B and others4

    Abstract论文阐明控制标记注入可抑制 CoT 使监控失效并促成拒绝绕过，且工具执行受解析器宽容度影响。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2609.15989

    Researchers propose plan injection attack that can bypass chain-of-thought monitoring

    提出 plan injection 攻击，植入良性伪装计划以绕过思维链监视器

    arXiv
    2609.15989
    Published
    Layer
    Prompt layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Attacker
    Gray-box
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct, Qwen3-8B, DeepSeek-R1-0528 and others6

    Abstract论文指出模型会将外部上下文中的伪装计划改写为自身推理，使思维链监视器失效甚至反向合理化恶意行为。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2609.01023

    Akrasia：针对推理型代码 LLM 的隐蔽后门攻击

    提出隐蔽后门攻击 AKRASIA，在推理代码模型提示中植入触发器并伪装思维链

    arXiv
    2609.01023
    Published
    Layer
    Prompt layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude-Sonnet-5, GPT-5.5, Gemini-3.5-flash and others7

    Abstract论文针对推理代码大模型提出了隐蔽推断期后门攻击 AKRASIA，揭示了模型思维链可被利用进行欺骗性伪装的安全隐患。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2608.09867

    Researchers steal proprietary LLM inference chains via cross-model compatibility of encrypted inference blocks

    利用加密思维块的跨模型重放，诱导弱模型逐字转写专有推理链

    arXiv
    2608.09867
    Published
    Layer
    Prompt layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.8, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Haiku 4.5 and others13

    Abstract论文揭示了客户端加密思维块跨模型互换漏洞，提出了低成本提取方法并给出防御方案。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. AttacksarXiv 2605.30040

    研究揭示 LLM 按 token 计费可被服务商系统性虚报

    构造可通过计费审计的 token 虚报，使服务商系统性超收

    arXiv
    2605.30040
    Published
    Layer
    Infrastructure layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    PALACE domain-adapted auditor
    Abstract不诚实提供方可在三种 token 审计上虚报并通过检查，作者认为需改用提供方不控制的证据。

    不透明 LLM 的按 token 计费里，现有审计核验的是提供方可控的证据，不诚实提供方可以虚报并通过检查。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end