Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 12 papers
Filter5

Attack type

Jailbreaks4Prompt injection3

Attack technique

Gradient and representation optimization8Automated search8Encoding and obfuscation6Role-play and persuasion5Conversation structure manipulation4Reasoning-chain manipulation14Cross-modal payloads10Defense-targeted11Dormant triggers21

Impact

Harmful content5Output manipulation4

System type

Models and APIs9

Attacker access

Black-box4White-box3

Attack surface / entry point

User input4Images, audio and video5

Layer

Prompt layer6Application layer3

System component

RAG4Guardrails and judges5Reasoning chains6Fine-tuning and open weights3Vision27Audio4Embeddings3Multimodal33
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 233papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Attack technique：Gradient and representation optimizationAttack technique：Conversation structure manipulationSystem component：Reasoning chainsSystem component：Fine-tuning and open weightsSystem component：AudioClear all

Another 233papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.12644

    Cancerous backdoor attack: progressive activation via invisible tokens and a stage controller.

    Proposes the Cancerous backdoor, which progressively corrupts reasoning using invisible stage tokens.

    arXiv
    2610.12644
    Published
    Layer
    Training and data layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3
    AbstractHidden tokens plus a stage controller make the backdoor progressively corrupt reasoning upon triggering, and the authors believe that looking only at the answer will miss it.

    Cancerous Backdoor Attack changes LLM backdoors from one-time activation to multi-stage reasoning corruption that accumulates progressively with triggers.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2610.01367

    研究：高质量数据筛选挡不住投毒

    提出 Bi-QSTO，优化能穿过质量筛选并在微调中削弱安全对齐的投毒样本

    arXiv
    2610.01367
    Published
    Layer
    Training and data layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    Llama2-7B-Chat, Llama3-8B-Instruct, Qwen2-7B-Instruct and others5
    Abstract质量筛选挡不住部分高分样本的安全削弱。

    Bi-QSTO 研究一个实际训练缺口：基于质量的数据选择会先于微调决定样本去留，而以往微调投毒多假设毒样本直接进入训练集。已对齐 LLM 的拒答会被少量有害或看似无害的微调样本削弱。作者用三个问题串起实验：选择能否排除毒样本。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2609.27542

    Researchers use control token injection to delete gpt-oss-20b's reasoning chain and bypass chain-of-thought monitoring

    提出控制标记注入，清空工具 Agent 的思维链以绕过推理监控

    arXiv
    2609.27542
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    openai/gpt-oss-20b, google/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it, deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B and others4

    Abstract论文阐明控制标记注入可抑制 CoT 使监控失效并促成拒绝绕过，且工具执行受解析器宽容度影响。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2608.09867

    Researchers steal proprietary LLM inference chains via cross-model compatibility of encrypted inference blocks

    利用加密思维块的跨模型重放，诱导弱模型逐字转写专有推理链

    arXiv
    2608.09867
    Published
    Layer
    Prompt layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.8, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Haiku 4.5 and others13

    Abstract论文揭示了客户端加密思维块跨模型互换漏洞，提出了低成本提取方法并给出防御方案。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2604.14604

    The AudioHijack framework achieves covert audio prompt injection against 13 speech large models

    提出 AudioHijack，用不可感知对抗音频对语音模型做上下文无关提示注入

    arXiv
    2604.14604
    Published
    Layer
    Prompt layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    SpeechGPT, GLM-4-Voice, VITA-Audio and others15

    Abstract提出了 AudioHijack 框架，揭示了 LALM 对听觉提示注入的脆弱性与传统防御的局限。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  12. AttacksarXiv 2406.12814

    论文提出 ARE 框架，在 VisualWebArena 上评估多模态 Agent 的对抗鲁棒性

    提出 ARE 框架与图像文本攻击，评测多模态网页 Agent 的对抗鲁棒性

    arXiv
    2406.12814
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, GPT-4V, Claude-3-Opus and others4

    Abstract系统评估多模态网页智能体的脆弱性，指出推理时计算组件被攻破会加剧系统风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end