Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 12 papers
Filter5

Attack type

Prompt injection3Poisoning and backdoors4Model tampering3

Attack technique

Dormant triggers3

Impact

Data and privacy leaks3Output manipulation4Availability and reliability3

System type

Models and APIs7AI Agent4

Attack surface / entry point

User input36Web pages and interfaces3Documents and messages4Tool responses4Code repositories and dependencies3Images, audio and video26Training data6Weights and gradients3

Layer

Application layer5Training and data layer5

System component

MCP and skills9Memory14RAG5Guardrails and judges15Monitors11Reasoning chains8Permissions and sandboxing10Fine-tuning and open weights58Vision13Audio4Video3Image generation7Multimodal25
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 215papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Attack surface / entry point：Documents and messagesAttack surface / entry point：Training dataAttack surface / entry point：Weights and gradientsSystem component：Reasoning chainsSystem component：AudioClear all

Another 215papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.12644

    Cancerous backdoor attack: progressive activation via invisible tokens and a stage controller.

    Proposes the Cancerous backdoor, which progressively corrupts reasoning using invisible stage tokens.

    arXiv
    2610.12644
    Published
    Layer
    Training and data layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3
    AbstractHidden tokens plus a stage controller make the backdoor progressively corrupt reasoning upon triggering, and the authors believe that looking only at the answer will miss it.

    Cancerous Backdoor Attack changes LLM backdoors from one-time activation to multi-stage reasoning corruption that accumulates progressively with triggers.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2610.09819

    FAB 攻击：给 HuBERT/WavLM 植入后门，背景警笛声即可让下游语音任务失灵

    提出 FAB 攻击，向声学基础模型植入可由环境声触发的后门

    arXiv
    2610.09819
    Published
    Layer
    Training and data layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    HuBERT-base, WavLM-base

    Abstract论文提出了针对声学基模的 FAB 后门攻击，在弱威胁模型下实现了任务无关、物理可触发的后门植入。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. DefensesarXiv 2609.38909

    Purdue 提出 Pact：将欺骗作为行为遗忘

    提出 PACT，遗忘推理模型在压力下的欺骗行为并保留上下文理解

    arXiv
    2609.38909
    Published
    Layer
    Training and data layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Attacker
    White-box
    Evaluated models
    DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B, QwQ-32B

    Abstract论文将大模型欺骗形式化为上下文条件行为，提出 PACT 框架在消除欺骗的同时保留了上下文遵循能力。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2609.27542

    Researchers use control token injection to delete gpt-oss-20b's reasoning chain and bypass chain-of-thought monitoring

    提出控制标记注入，清空工具 Agent 的思维链以绕过推理监控

    arXiv
    2609.27542
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    openai/gpt-oss-20b, google/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it, deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B and others4

    Abstract论文阐明控制标记注入可抑制 CoT 使监控失效并促成拒绝绕过，且工具执行受解析器宽容度影响。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2609.09404

    MMPIBench：多模态提示注入对六种 Agent 框架的跨框架评测

    用 MMPIBench 评测多模态提示注入对 Agent 框架的影响

    arXiv
    2609.09404
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.8, GPT-5.4, Gemini 3.1 Pro and others6

    Abstract论文提出 MMPIBench 评测多模态提示注入对智能体的影响，发现模型主导行为、尝试远超完成，音频通道缺乏防护。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. AttacksarXiv 2605.30040

    研究揭示 LLM 按 token 计费可被服务商系统性虚报

    构造可通过计费审计的 token 虚报，使服务商系统性超收

    arXiv
    2605.30040
    Published
    Layer
    Infrastructure layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    PALACE domain-adapted auditor
    Abstract不诚实提供方可在三种 token 审计上虚报并通过检查，作者认为需改用提供方不控制的证据。

    不透明 LLM 的按 token 计费里，现有审计核验的是提供方可控的证据，不诚实提供方可以虚报并通过检查。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. AttacksarXiv 2602.18514

    招聘中的特洛伊木马：标准模型与推理模型间接提示注入的红队测试案例研究

    用简历中的不可见指令做间接提示注入，操纵招聘推荐

    arXiv
    2602.18514
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    LLM applications
    Evaluated models
    Qwen 3 30B A3B Instruct 2507, Qwen 3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

    Abstract作者称推理在简单注入下会帮攻击圆谎，在不合逻辑的复杂注入下又会把欺骗漏出来。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end