Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 20 papers

Another 240papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.11932

    A Fudan team measures the citation fragility of AI search: ordinary posts can enter citations and answer text

    Measures citation fragility in AI search, demonstrating that ordinary public posts can enter citations and answers.

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Grok, Doubao, ChatGPT and others10

    AbstractThe authors claim the paper quantifies vulnerabilities in AI search caused by citation preferences and low posting thresholds; tests show public web posts can penetrate AI citations, and they call for auditing the citation supply chain.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. DefensesarXiv 2610.07276

    SAFESHIELD:小语言模型部署时安全的决策组织框架

    提出 SAFESHIELD,组织小语言模型部署时的安全决策

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-4B-Instruct
    AbstractSAFESHIELD 用可审计决策轨迹组织 SLM 部署时的四项安全决策,并报告协调依赖影响端到端结果。

    SAFESHIELD 是面向小语言模型的部署时安全框架,把运行时安全从单项审核改写成可检查的决策过程。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AgentDoxx:联网搜索 Agent 对匿名访谈文本的再识别评测

    构建 AGENTDOXX 基准,评测联网搜索 Agent 对匿名访谈的再识别

    Published
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.6 Terra, GPT-5 Mini, GPT-4.1 Mini and others10

    Abstract论文提出了已知身份的重识别基准 AGENTDOXX,揭示搜索与记忆双重风险及现有防御在检索轨迹中的泄露漏洞。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. MADBench:多智能体辩论安全性评测基准发布

    提出 MADBench,评测多智能体辩论是吸收还是放大对抗影响

    Published
    Evaluated models
    gpt-4o, GPT-5, GPT-6 Astra
    AbstractMADBench 显示辩论能吸收部分准确率攻击,同时放大未授权读写。

    MADBench 是一个评测多智能体辩论安全性的基准,用来看攻击是被辩论吸收还是被放大。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. DefensesarXiv 2609.36326

    PILLAR:面向增强检索的私有倒排索引词法查找

    提出 PILLAR,用私有词法预筛与客户端重排保护 RAG 查询

    Published
    AbstractPILLAR 用固定模式的私有 BM25 预筛加本地嵌入重排,在两基准上换取延迟或质量。

    PILLAR 是面向公开语料的隐私 RAG:半诚实服务器学不到查询词项和访问模式,客户端仍拿到用于增强生成的 k 篇文档。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2609.37468

    论文提出针对 Agentic RAG 的检索器后门攻击与 DOU 隐藏方法

    提出检索器后门攻击操纵智能体搜索,并用 DOU 逃避检测

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    E5, Contriever-MSMARCO

    Abstract论文展示了通过恶意检索器操纵智能体多轮搜索并利用诱饵重塑表征隐蔽后门的可行性与系统风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2609.14649

    CIG-MIA:利用上下文信息增益对 RAG 系统发起成员推断攻击

    提出 CIG-MIA,用上下文信息增益推断 RAG 知识库成员身份

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3, Llama-2-13b-chat-hf and others6
    AbstractCIG-MIA 用注入前后的答案似然差推断 RAG 库成员,灰盒可分性高于所列基线。

    CIG-MIA 是针对 RAG 外部知识库的成员推断攻击,同时覆盖灰盒和纯文本黑盒。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. Counter-GEO-Bench:现有护栏难挡 GEO 虚假信息

    构建 COUNTER-GEO-BENCH,评测生成式搜索中的 GEO 虚假信息防御

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Gemma-4-31B-IT, Qwen-3.5-35B-A3B, Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E and others8

    Abstract论文构建了针对 GEO 虚假信息的首个防御基准,揭示通用护栏的失效与反作用,并提出了有效的轻量对比检测基线。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. AttacksarXiv 2608.04565

    Researchers propose Breadcrumbing long-range attack that can hijack the evidence chain of DeepResearch-style search agents

    提出权威链劫持与轨迹引导策略演化,劫持搜索 Agent 的证据链

    Published
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3.5-9B, Gemma4-31B, DeepResearch and others7

    Abstract论文揭示了多步搜索智能体在受限中间人操纵下的脆弱性,提出 ACH 策略与 TGSE 演化方法并完成系统验证。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. DefensesarXiv 2608.12361

    基于搜索增强 LLM 的中文新词毒性共识检测框架 SeTox

    提出 SeTox 检索增强框架,检测中文新词的隐性毒性

    Published
    Evaluated models
    SeTox-Qwen2.5-7B
    AbstractSeTox 用检索把公共共识接入静态 LLM,以检测中文毒性新词。

    SeTox 研究中文新词上的隐性毒性检测:词表加检索增强,使静态 LLM 在不重训练的情况下利用公开网页上下文。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. DefensesarXiv 2605.19847

    论文揭示多租户 RAG 账号合谋使隐私泄露随账号数线性增长

    提出零知识审计协议,核验多租户 RAG 的合谋差分隐私

    Published
    Abstract揭示多租户 RAG 合谋泄露按根号 k 放大,提出带零知识证明的无泄露审计协议。

    论文针对多租户 RAG 服务在多账户协同攻击下隐私边界失效的问题展开研究。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  12. AttacksarXiv 2603.17239

    LAAF: A Systematic Red-Teaming Method and Automated Attack Framework for LPCI Vulnerabilities in Agentic LLM Systems

    Proposes LAAF, which automatically attacks LPCI vulnerabilities in agent systems in stages

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gemini-2.0-flash-001, claude-3-haiku-20240307, meta-llama/llama-3.1-70b-instruct and others5
    AbstractLAAF does LPCI red teaming with taxonomy plus stage seeding.

    The authors state that LAAF is an automated red-teaming framework built specifically for LPCI in agentic LLMs. The issue to address is that encoded, delayed, and conditionally triggered payloads can persist in memory or RAG and re-enter across sessions, whereas Garak and PyRIT do not use the previous round's breakthrough results to seed the next stage across the six stages.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  13. AttacksarXiv 2512.01335

    EmoRAG 研究揭示 RAG 检索对表情符号扰动的脆弱性

    提出 EmoRAG,向查询与知识库注入同一表情以劫持 RAG 检索

    Published
    Evaluated models
    SPECTER, Contriever, Qwen2-7B and others11
    AbstractEmoRAG 用表情联动查询与库文本。

    EmoRAG 测量 RAG 对符号扰动的反应:同一表情同时出现在查询和库文本里时,检索会偏离语义匹配。作者要检查的是,检索是否真由语义相关性决定。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  14. AttacksarXiv 2507.10457

    论文提出 LPCI:针对 Agent 逻辑层与持久记忆的提示控制注入攻击

    提出 LPCI,把延迟条件载荷写入记忆与检索库以跨会话触发

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    ChatGPT, Claude, LLaMA3 and others8
    Abstract作者定义 LPCI。

    作者把LPCI定义为针对智能体逻辑执行、记忆留存和工具集成的跨阶段漏洞类,而不是单次输入上的提示改写。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end