Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 3 papers
Filter4

Attack surface / entry point

User input10Web pages and interfaces2Documents and messages3Tool responses3Retrieval corpus19Inference services and hardware1

System component

Memory3RAG2Monitors1Reasoning chains3Vision4Multimodal4
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 232papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Attack surface / entry point：Web pages and interfacesAttack surface / entry point：Inference services and hardwareSystem component：RAGSystem component：MonitorsClear all

Another 232papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.11932

    A Fudan team measures the citation fragility of AI search: ordinary posts can enter citations and answer text

    Measures citation fragility in AI search, demonstrating that ordinary public posts can enter citations and answers.

    arXiv
    2610.11932
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    LLM applications
    Evaluated models
    Grok, Doubao, ChatGPT and others10

    AbstractThe authors claim the paper quantifies vulnerabilities in AI search caused by citation preferences and low posting thresholds; tests show public web posts can penetrate AI citations, and they call for auditing the citation supply chain.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2608.04565

    Researchers propose Breadcrumbing long-range attack that can hijack the evidence chain of DeepResearch-style search agents

    提出权威链劫持与轨迹引导策略演化，劫持搜索 Agent 的证据链

    arXiv
    2608.04565
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3.5-9B, Gemma4-31B, DeepResearch and others7

    Abstract论文揭示了多步搜索智能体在受限中间人操纵下的脆弱性，提出 ACH 策略与 TGSE 演化方法并完成系统验证。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AttacksarXiv 2605.30040

    研究揭示 LLM 按 token 计费可被服务商系统性虚报

    构造可通过计费审计的 token 虚报，使服务商系统性超收

    arXiv
    2605.30040
    Published
    Layer
    Infrastructure layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    PALACE domain-adapted auditor
    Abstract不诚实提供方可在三种 token 审计上虚报并通过检查，作者认为需改用提供方不控制的证据。

    不透明 LLM 的按 token 计费里，现有审计核验的是提供方可控的证据，不诚实提供方可以虚报并通过检查。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end