Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 10 papers

Another 255papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. DefensesarXiv 2610.07657

    DEFER1 多智能体防御研究报告受控测试中的攻击成功率下降

    实现 DEFER,以确定性检查优先拦截多智能体流水线的内容攻击

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507, gpt-oss-120b, Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct and others5
    AbstractDEFER 把确定性检查放在 judge 之前。

    DEFER 用来测量多智能体授权流水线里,确定性规则在何处结束、LLM judge 从何处开始。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2609.22510

    特拉维夫大学提出爆炸性提示词:条件触发的间接提示注入可绕过九款生产 Agent

    提出条件触发的爆炸提示词,并设计摄入期检测器 DeFuse

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct and others15
    Abstract论文揭示了条件触发使提示注入绕过防御并在触发时执行工具,提出轻量检测器并在摄入期有效防范。

    论文针对大语言模型智能体面临的间接提示注入威胁,研究了利用条件句式实现时间分离的爆炸提示词。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AttacksarXiv 2609.02774

    CodePoisonRAG:针对检索增强代码生成的知识投毒攻击

    提出 CodePoisonRAG,对检索增强代码生成的知识库投毒以植入漏洞

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen 3.5 9B, Code Llama 13B, DeepSeek-Coder-V2 16B

    AbstractCodePoisonRAG 展示了 RACG 外部知识库的新攻击面,在较低投毒率下可定向诱发指定漏洞并部分抵御防御。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. DefensesarXiv 2608.06422

    CMU 研究:分片判断可避免 LLM 监督失效并抵御对抗利用

    提出分片监督,将评判标准分配给独立调用以抵御展示攻击

    Published
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.8, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.6 and others4
    Abstract论文揭示决策负载是大模型监督的独立瓶颈,提出分片与辩论机制有效分离注意力与平衡证据,在多项高难度基准上实现稳健评判。

    本文系统研究了大语言模型在执行多标准监督与评判时的决策负载瓶颈及其安全风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2606.09084

    研究者提出 Context-Fractured Decomposition 攻击

    提出 CFD 跨会话分解攻击,利用工件来源缺口绕过工具型 Agent 的本地检查

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4.1, GPT-5-nano, Claude-3.5-Sonnet and others6
    AbstractCFD 用无指令 artifact 把越狱拆到跨会话。

    CFD针对工具型 LLM 智能体:利用 artifact 来源不被跟踪这一部署失败模式,把有害目标拆开后延迟组合。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2603.17239

    LAAF: A Systematic Red-Teaming Method and Automated Attack Framework for LPCI Vulnerabilities in Agentic LLM Systems

    提出 LAAF,分阶段自动攻击智能体系统的 LPCI 漏洞

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gemini-2.0-flash-001, claude-3-haiku-20240307, meta-llama/llama-3.1-70b-instruct and others5
    AbstractLAAF does LPCI red teaming with taxonomy plus stage seeding.

    The authors state that LAAF is an automated red-teaming framework built specifically for LPCI in agentic LLMs. The issue to address is that encoded, delayed, and conditionally triggered payloads can persist in memory or RAG and re-enter across sessions, whereas Garak and PyRIT do not use the previous round's breakthrough results to seed the next stage across the six stages.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2507.10457

    论文提出 LPCI:针对 Agent 逻辑层与持久记忆的提示控制注入攻击

    提出 LPCI,把延迟条件载荷写入记忆与检索库以跨会话触发

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    ChatGPT, Claude, LLaMA3 and others8
    Abstract作者定义 LPCI。

    作者把LPCI定义为针对智能体逻辑执行、记忆留存和工具集成的跨阶段漏洞类,而不是单次输入上的提示改写。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end