Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 4 papers
Filter4
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 233papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Another 233papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. 研究提出 Agent 安全新维度:识别未履行的安全义务

    提出义务识别基准 ObligationBench,并训练护栏识别 Agent 未履行的安全义务

    Published
    Evaluated models
    ObligationGuard, Claude-Opus-4.8, GPT-5.6-Sol and others17
    Abstract义务是护栏缺口。

    作者认为编码智能体的安全不能只靠拦截禁止动作,还要找出终止时仍未做的安全关键动作,并将其称为义务。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. MADBench:多智能体辩论安全性评测基准发布

    提出 MADBench,评测多智能体辩论是吸收还是放大对抗影响

    Published
    Evaluated models
    gpt-4o, GPT-5, GPT-6 Astra
    AbstractMADBench 显示辩论能吸收部分准确率攻击,同时放大未授权读写。

    MADBench 是一个评测多智能体辩论安全性的基准,用来看攻击是被辩论吸收还是被放大。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. CS-Guard:首个面向代码生成安全的 LLM 护栏评测基准

    提出 CS-Guard 基准,评测代码生成护栏对虚构场景攻击的防御

    Published
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    CodeLlama-13B-Instruct, DeepSeekCoder-V2-Lite-16B, GPT-OSS-20B and others7

    Abstract论文提出了代码安全护栏基准 CS-Guard,评估发现现有护栏对虚构场景攻击和代码级恶意请求防御较弱。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. SafeScientist:让 LLM 智能体的科学发现具备风险意识

    提出 SafeScientist 四层监控,阻止科研智能体执行高风险或不伦理任务

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, GPT-3.5-turbo and others5
    Abstract四层监控加科研安全基准。

    SafeScientist 是带四层监控的科研智能体框架,并用 SciSafetyBench 评测科学场景中的任务安全。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end