Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 20 papers

Another 219papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. DefensesarXiv 2610.09469

    Secure-CUA: Constraining the Impact of Untrusted Content in Computer-Use Agents

    提出 Secure-CUA,用动作事务约束计算机使用智能体的不可信影响

    Published
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 5, Gemini 3.8 Flash, GPT-5.6-Sol
    AbstractSecure-CUA 用每步事务约束不可信影响,良性 TSR 接近 Vanilla-CUA。

    Secure-CUA 要限制图形界面里不可信内容对 CUA 决策和 GUI 执行的影响,同时保留合法任务所需的不可信信息。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2610.09240

    WebMirage hijacks visual web agents' browser operations with adversarial images

    提出 WebMirage,用局部对抗图像劫持视觉网页 Agent 的浏览器操作

    Published
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    LLaVA-v1.5-13B, LLaVA-v1.6-34B, MiniCPM-o-8B and others6
    Abstract论文提出了针对网络智能体的端到端视觉红队框架 WebMirage,揭示了从视觉定位到浏览器执行的安全脆弱性。

    WebMirage 是一个面向视觉定位网络智能体的流水线感知端到端红队攻击框架。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. DefensesarXiv 2610.04616

    PerturBot 用扰动训练打破视觉-语言-动作模型的模态捷径

    提出 Perturbot 扰动训练,打破 VLA 的模态捷径

    Published
    Evaluated models
    π0.5
    AbstractPerturbot 改训练数据以削弱三类模态捷径,GroundFscore 用来看成功是否来自任务证据。

    Perturbot 是一套不改推理的 VLA 训练期数据干预,用来削弱模态捷径,并用离线分数区分“任务变好”和“靠捷径变好”。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. VoxParity 评测:语音智能体在需要听声判断时仍按文字行事

    提出 VoxParity,固定转写只改音频,评测语音智能体是否按行业规则改工具调用

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    MiMo-V2.6-Pro, gemini-3.7-flash, Qwen3.8-Omni and others15
    AbstractVoxParity 用固定转写的音频对比和 words-only null,测量语音智能体是否按所听内容改变工具调用。

    VoxParity 测量语音智能体在词语不变、只有声音改变时,是否按行业规则改它所执行的工具调用。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. MMSkillRisk:多模态技能图像中的隐藏指令可诱导 Agent 执行未授权操作

    提出 MMSkillRisk 基准,评测多模态技能图像中的隐藏指令诱导 Agent 越权操作

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.6-sol, Kimi-K2.6, Kimi-K3 and others6

    Abstract论文提出 MMSkillRisk 基准与 NCVA 攻击,揭示多模态技能中教学图像潜藏指令可引发未授权操作并与良性任务共存。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. MMPIBench:多模态提示注入对六种 Agent 框架的跨框架评测

    用 MMPIBench 评测多模态提示注入对 Agent 框架的影响

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.8, GPT-5.4, Gemini 3.1 Pro and others6

    Abstract论文提出 MMPIBench 评测多模态提示注入对智能体的影响,发现模型主导行为、尝试远超完成,音频通道缺乏防护。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2609.04533

    Repeat-After-Me:针对黑盒 VLM 的自适应视觉提示注入攻击

    提出 Repeat-After-Me 自适应视觉提示注入,诱导 VLM 智能体执行指定任务

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude-Opus-4.7, GPT-5.5, Gemini-3.1-Pro and others6

    Abstract论文提出了针对黑盒 VLM 的前缀诱导自适应视觉提示注入,在多款模型上诱发了工具调用与隐私泄露。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. HazardArena:面向 VLA 模型的语义安全评测基准

    提出 HazardArena 基准,用孪生场景评测 VLA 的语义安全

    Published
    Evaluated models
    OpenVLA-OFT, π0, NORA and others4
    Abstractsafe-only 微调提升良性执行,也提升匹配不安全孪生上的危险完成。

    HazardArena 评测 VLA 在运动要求不变时,能否因语义风险而停手。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. DefensesarXiv 2603.14707

    Visual Confusion Agents: Exploiting and Defending Against Perception Failures in Computer-Use Agents

    Proposes out-of-process dual-channel comparison classification to intercept erroneous clicks by computer-use agents

    Published
    Evaluated models
    multi-modal-embed-small
    AbstractPerception errors can be exploited by swapping screen pixels.

    The authors frame CUA's perception failure as a security vulnerability, visual confused deputy: the agent authorizes click(x,y) based on a misread screen, and the actual landing point differs from the element it believes it is clicking.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. DefensesarXiv 2602.10915

    Blind Gods and Broken Screens: Building a Secure, Intent-Centric Mobile Agent Operating System

    提出 Aura,用可信内核中介移动 Agent 的身份、感知与动作控制

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Gemini-3-Flash
    AbstractAura mediates structured interactions via the Agent Kernel.

    Aura uses kernel-mediated structured agent interaction, replacing screen-interface mobile assistants..

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. AttacksarXiv 2602.07379

    Aegis: Governance, Integrity, and Security for AI Voice Agents

    提出 Aegis 红队框架,多轮攻击高风险语音 Agent

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, Gemini-1.5 Pro and others7
    AbstractAegis red-teams three types of voice agents: query-based access eliminates authentication and leakage successes, but behavioral attacks remain.

    Aegis uses multi-turn red-teaming evaluation on ALLM voice agents already integrated into business systems. The authors call this the first systematic red-teaming framework in this setting.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  12. WAInjectBench 系统评测网页 Agent 的提示注入检测方法

    提出 WAInjectBench 评测网页 Agent 的提示注入检测

    Published
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.1, Llama-Prompt-Guard-2-86M and others8
    AbstractWAInjectBench 比较网页智能体的提示注入检测:显式线索可被部分检出,隐蔽攻击大多漏检。

    WAInjectBench 是网页智能体提示注入检测的基准。作者要看现有检测器能否发现这类攻击:攻击者改网页,使智能体执行目标动作,而不是用户任务。作者称这是首个此类综合基准。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  13. AttacksarXiv 2505.23266

    AdvOF:用对抗物体融合攻击 VLM 驱动的视觉语言导航智能体

    提出 AdvOF,生成对抗物体误导视觉语言导航智能体的场景感知

    Published
    Attacker
    White-box
    Evaluated models
    Lseg, Clip, ViT-L/16 and others5
    AbstractAdvOF 以多视角融合生成对抗物体。

    AdvOF 是针对 VLM 驱动 VLN 服务导航的对抗物体攻击。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  14. AttacksarXiv 2505.11717

    WebInject:通过网页像素扰动对多模态网页 Agent 实施提示注入

    提出 WebInject,用网页像素扰动诱导网页 Agent 执行指定动作

    Published
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    UI-TARS-7B-SFT, Phi-4-multimodal-instruct, Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct and others5
    AbstractWebInject 经源码扰动原始像素。

    WebInject 是对 MLLM 网页智能体的环境提示注入:修改网页源码,使原始像素上的扰动经过显示器映射后,诱导智能体执行攻击者指定动作。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  15. AttacksarXiv 2406.12814

    论文提出 ARE 框架,在 VisualWebArena 上评估多模态 Agent 的对抗鲁棒性

    提出 ARE 框架与图像文本攻击,评测多模态网页 Agent 的对抗鲁棒性

    Published
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, GPT-4V, Claude-3-Opus and others4

    Abstract系统评估多模态网页智能体的脆弱性,指出推理时计算组件被攻破会加剧系统风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end