Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 14 papers

Another 227papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. EvoRiskBench: An evolutionary benchmark for runtime security risks of workspace agents

    构建 EvoRiskBench 评测工作区 Agent 的运行时安全风险

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.6 Sol, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813, Claude Opus 5

    Abstract论文构建了工作空间智能体运行时风险基准 EvoRiskBench,发现高执行力智能体在 IPI 下面临较高安全风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. Emergence World:对长时程多智能体系统开展对抗压力测试

    提出 Emergence World,对长时程多智能体系统开展对抗压力测试

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.8, DeepSeek v4 Pro, Gemini 3.5 Flash and others9

    Abstract作者通过长期平行世界实验指出模型对齐不具备可组合性,单模型群体会产生社会奉承、协同退缩及语言不透明等失效。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. 多智能体协同过滤系统的连接性攻击与防御研究

    复现 AgentCF 上的多智能体攻防并刻画连通性作用

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-235B-A22B, Claude Haiku 4.5, Mixtral 8×7B and others4
    Abstract连通性沿 k 与ρ改变攻防,且用户/物品与早期/稳态需要分开看。

    作者在 AgentCF 上研究连通性如何改变多智能体协同过滤的攻防,复现已有方法而不是提出新载荷。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. 论文评测 Claude Code 与 Codex 记忆文件中的提示注入风险

    评测编码 Agent 记忆文件中提示注入的跨会话影响

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Claude Haiku 4.5, Claude Opus 4.7, GPT-5.2 and others4
    Abstract已植入记忆文件的载荷可以跨会话影响 Claude Code 与 Codex,攻击成功与载荷是否留下是两种不同的失败。

    Bad Memory 在沙箱合成工作区里评测文件型持久记忆上的提示注入,比较载荷能否改变当前会话,以及能否在后续会话中留下或叠加。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2606.04329

    研究者系统研究 LLM 智能体记忆投毒攻击并提出 MPBench 基准

    系统研究 LLM 智能体记忆投毒并构建基准 MPBench

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct, Deberta-v3-base, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and others5

    Abstract系统研究了智能体记忆投毒风险,揭示了写入渠道漏洞,构建了 MPBench 基准并指出提示注入防御的局限。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2605.15338

    Hidden in Memory: Latent Memory Poisoning of LLM Agents

    提出潜伏记忆投毒,诱导 Agent 把外部文档写成持久伪造记忆

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.4, GPT-5.5, Claude Sonnet 4.6 and others12
    Abstract持久记忆成为跨会话攻击面:通用载荷可写入伪造记忆,并在相关后续任务中影响行为。

    sleeper memory poisoning 研究带持久记忆的 LLM 助手:外部文档能否让助手存下一则伪造的用户记忆,并在原文档消失后的新会话里被取回、用来改变回复或动作。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2605.08460

    论文建模多智能体网络中的子智能体继承攻击面

    建模并利用多智能体网络中子智能体生成时的记忆继承漏洞

    Published
    Evaluated models
    MiniMax M2.5, Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct-FP8, Qwen3.5-Plus and others5
    Abstract形式化子智能体继承,在 OpenClaw 上演示四类编排层漏洞并提出防御。

    作者对多智能体网络里的子智能体继承做形式化分析,并用开源框架上的 PoC 演示编排层如何让单点妥协继续扩散。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. 论文提出 eTAMP 攻击:网页内容注入可跨会话污染 Web Agent 记忆

    提出 eTAMP,用网页内容跨会话投毒 Web Agent 轨迹记忆并诱导越权操作

    Published
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5-mini, GPT-5.2, GPT-OSS-120B and others6
    Abstract论文提出了基于环境注入的跨任务记忆投毒攻击 eTAMP,作者报告智能体在环境压力下易感性增加且能力与安全并不协同。

    该论文评估了基于大语言模型的 Web 智能体在利用历史交互轨迹进行记忆增强时的安全脆弱性。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. DefensesarXiv 2603.12644

    Revealing security threats and defense architectures for autonomous agents: an OpenClaw case study

    Reviews threats to autonomous agents and proposes a full-lifecycle defense blueprint, FASA

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractUsing OpenClaw as an example, it divides risks into three layers and uses FASA to describe defense from input to system execution.

    This is a threat review and defense architecture report using OpenClaw as a case study, not a scored attack or defense evaluation.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. DefensesarXiv 2603.11619

    Taming OpenClaw: Security Analysis and Mitigation of Threats in Autonomous LLM Agents

    Proposes a defense-in-depth aligned with the five stages to mitigate cross-stage threats to autonomous agents

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractThis is a lifecycle threat analysis and layered mitigation design for OpenClaw, with the cases serving as qualitative evidence.

    This is a lifecycle threat analysis of OpenClaw, accompanied by a set of layered mitigation designs. The problem addressed is: when autonomous agents connect instant messaging, persistent memory, third-party plugins, and high-privilege execution, attacks are no longer limited to single-turn jailbreaks but can compound across multiple stages from initialization to execution. The authors argue that defenses hardening only individual interfaces cannot stop such cross-temporal attacks.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end