Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 12 papers

Another 233papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. DefensesarXiv 2610.02861

    论文提出在 Kubernetes 上保护 AI Agent 的七层纵深防御框架与参考架构

    提出 Kubernetes 运维智能体的七层纵深防御框架与参考架构

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Abstract把运维智能体当不可信租户,用七层控制在完全攻破假设下约束行动。

    把 Kubernetes 上的运维智能体当作不可信租户,在假定提示注入已完全控制其工具选择的前提下,用基础设施重建数据面与控制面的边界。要解决的是:智能体读日志、注解、工单或 MCP 工具描述时,这些内容可以变成它带着自身凭据执行的命令。模型对齐和分类器只降低概率。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. DefensesarXiv 2609.17648

    多智能体 LLM 流水线中的信任传播与结构隔离

    用任务绑定令牌和策略预言机拦住多智能体流水线的未授权执行

    Published
    Evaluated models
    gemma4:31b-cloud
    Abstract结构性授权拦住了记忆投毒的未授权执行,持密钥时承重的是策略预言机。

    作者在一条会改写沙箱邮件库的四智能体流水线上,检查低权限失陷会不会变成未授权的真实动作。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AttacksarXiv 2606.04329

    研究者系统研究 LLM 智能体记忆投毒攻击并提出 MPBench 基准

    系统研究 LLM 智能体记忆投毒并构建基准 MPBench

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct, Deberta-v3-base, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and others5

    Abstract系统研究了智能体记忆投毒风险,揭示了写入渠道漏洞,构建了 MPBench 基准并指出提示注入防御的局限。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2605.15338

    Hidden in Memory: Latent Memory Poisoning of LLM Agents

    提出潜伏记忆投毒,诱导 Agent 把外部文档写成持久伪造记忆

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.4, GPT-5.5, Claude Sonnet 4.6 and others12
    Abstract持久记忆成为跨会话攻击面:通用载荷可写入伪造记忆,并在相关后续任务中影响行为。

    sleeper memory poisoning 研究带持久记忆的 LLM 助手:外部文档能否让助手存下一则伪造的用户记忆,并在原文档消失后的新会话里被取回、用来改变回复或动作。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. 论文提出 eTAMP 攻击:网页内容注入可跨会话污染 Web Agent 记忆

    提出 eTAMP,用网页内容跨会话投毒 Web Agent 轨迹记忆并诱导越权操作

    Published
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5-mini, GPT-5.2, GPT-OSS-120B and others6
    Abstract论文提出了基于环境注入的跨任务记忆投毒攻击 eTAMP,作者报告智能体在环境压力下易感性增加且能力与安全并不协同。

    该论文评估了基于大语言模型的 Web 智能体在利用历史交互轨迹进行记忆增强时的安全脆弱性。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2603.17239

    LAAF: A Systematic Red-Teaming Method and Automated Attack Framework for LPCI Vulnerabilities in Agentic LLM Systems

    Proposes LAAF, which automatically attacks LPCI vulnerabilities in agent systems in stages

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gemini-2.0-flash-001, claude-3-haiku-20240307, meta-llama/llama-3.1-70b-instruct and others5
    AbstractLAAF does LPCI red teaming with taxonomy plus stage seeding.

    The authors state that LAAF is an automated red-teaming framework built specifically for LPCI in agentic LLMs. The issue to address is that encoded, delayed, and conditionally triggered payloads can persist in memory or RAG and re-enter across sessions, whereas Garak and PyRIT do not use the previous round's breakthrough results to seed the next stage across the six stages.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. DefensesarXiv 2603.12644

    Revealing security threats and defense architectures for autonomous agents: an OpenClaw case study

    Reviews threats to autonomous agents and proposes a full-lifecycle defense blueprint, FASA

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractUsing OpenClaw as an example, it divides risks into three layers and uses FASA to describe defense from input to system execution.

    This is a threat review and defense architecture report using OpenClaw as a case study, not a scored attack or defense evaluation.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. DefensesarXiv 2603.11619

    Taming OpenClaw: Security Analysis and Mitigation of Threats in Autonomous LLM Agents

    Proposes a defense-in-depth aligned with the five stages to mitigate cross-stage threats to autonomous agents

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractThis is a lifecycle threat analysis and layered mitigation design for OpenClaw, with the cases serving as qualitative evidence.

    This is a lifecycle threat analysis of OpenClaw, accompanied by a set of layered mitigation designs. The problem addressed is: when autonomous agents connect instant messaging, persistent memory, third-party plugins, and high-privilege execution, attacks are no longer limited to single-turn jailbreaks but can compound across multiple stages from initialization to execution. The authors argue that defenses hardening only individual interfaces cannot stop such cross-temporal attacks.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. AttacksarXiv 2507.10457

    论文提出 LPCI:针对 Agent 逻辑层与持久记忆的提示控制注入攻击

    提出 LPCI,把延迟条件载荷写入记忆与检索库以跨会话触发

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    ChatGPT, Claude, LLaMA3 and others8
    Abstract作者定义 LPCI。

    作者把LPCI定义为针对智能体逻辑执行、记忆留存和工具集成的跨阶段漏洞类,而不是单次输入上的提示改写。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end