Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 7 papers
Filter4
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 240papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Another 240papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. DefensesarXiv 2610.07657

    DEFER1 多智能体防御研究报告受控测试中的攻击成功率下降

    实现 DEFER,以确定性检查优先拦截多智能体流水线的内容攻击

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507, gpt-oss-120b, Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct and others5
    AbstractDEFER 把确定性检查放在 judge 之前。

    DEFER 用来测量多智能体授权流水线里,确定性规则在何处结束、LLM judge 从何处开始。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. DefensesarXiv 2609.29647

    AgentKernel:面向 Agent 的可信原生操作系统内核

    提出 AgentKernel,用四支柱强制中介 Agent 的输入、工具与记忆

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractAgentKernel 是四支柱智能体 OS 设计,安全论证未附带实测数字。

    AgentKernel 是把安全做成组织原则的智能体 OS 架构,不是带跑分的攻防评测。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. DefensesarXiv 2606.24322

    Protecting LLM agent long-term memory from poisoning: tamper-evident, source-bound permissions and machine-checkable guarantees

    提出 TMA-NM,以写时来源绑定抵御 Agent 长期记忆投毒

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gpt-5-chat, gpt-4o-mini, claude-opus-4.1 and others8
    AbstractTMA-NM 用来源绑定的行动权限挡住记忆洗白。

    TMA-NM 把 LLM 智能体长期记忆的行动权限绑到写时来源,用来挡住跨会话记忆投毒。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. DefensesarXiv 2603.11619

    Taming OpenClaw: Security Analysis and Mitigation of Threats in Autonomous LLM Agents

    Proposes a defense-in-depth aligned with the five stages to mitigate cross-stage threats to autonomous agents

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractThis is a lifecycle threat analysis and layered mitigation design for OpenClaw, with the cases serving as qualitative evidence.

    This is a lifecycle threat analysis of OpenClaw, accompanied by a set of layered mitigation designs. The problem addressed is: when autonomous agents connect instant messaging, persistent memory, third-party plugins, and high-privilege execution, attacks are no longer limited to single-turn jailbreaks but can compound across multiple stages from initialization to execution. The authors argue that defenses hardening only individual interfaces cannot stop such cross-temporal attacks.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end