Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 9 papers
Filter4

Attack type

Prompt injection4Poisoning and backdoors4

Attack technique

Automated search10Encoding and obfuscation5Conversation structure manipulation4Reasoning-chain manipulation12Cross-modal payloads3Defense-targeted5Dormant triggers23

Impact

Data and privacy leaks3Output manipulation3

System type

Models and APIs4AI Agent4

Attacker access

Black-box3

Attack surface / entry point

User input6Memory writes3

Layer

Prompt layer3Application layer5

System component

MCP and skills7Memory3RAG3Guardrails and judges19Reasoning chains6Vision13Image generation7Multimodal20
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 262papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Attack technique：Encoding and obfuscationAttack technique：Conversation structure manipulationSystem component：MemorySystem component：Reasoning chainsClear all

Another 262papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.12644

    Cancerous backdoor attack: progressive activation via invisible tokens and a stage controller.

    Proposes the Cancerous backdoor, which progressively corrupts reasoning using invisible stage tokens.

    arXiv
    2610.12644
    Published
    Layer
    Training and data layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3
    AbstractHidden tokens plus a stage controller make the backdoor progressively corrupt reasoning upon triggering, and the authors believe that looking only at the answer will miss it.

    Cancerous Backdoor Attack changes LLM backdoors from one-time activation to multi-stage reasoning corruption that accumulates progressively with triggers.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2610.04589

    StegoMemory red team testing: agent persistent memory can be used as a cross-session covert channel

    提出 StegoMemory，评测智能体持久记忆作为跨会话隐写信道

    arXiv
    2610.04589
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Llama 3.1 405B, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o and others13

    Abstract研究揭示智能体持久记忆可作为隐蔽信道跨会话传输机密，写入持久化是主要防御瓶颈，呼吁建立记忆完整性防御。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2609.27542

    Researchers use control token injection to delete gpt-oss-20b's reasoning chain and bypass chain-of-thought monitoring

    提出控制标记注入，清空工具 Agent 的思维链以绕过推理监控

    arXiv
    2609.27542
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    openai/gpt-oss-20b, google/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it, deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B and others4

    Abstract论文阐明控制标记注入可抑制 CoT 使监控失效并促成拒绝绕过，且工具执行受解析器宽容度影响。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2609.09553

    研究：任意密文攻击前沿大模型无需微调即可越狱

    提出任意字母置换密码越狱，无需微调即可诱导有害输出

    arXiv
    2609.09553
    Published
    Layer
    Prompt layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    Claude Sonnet 4, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Gemini 3 Flash (preview) and others7

    Abstract前沿大模型无需微调即可通过提示词学会字母置换密码，进而绕过分类器与对齐，作者呼吁关注能力提升带来的安全风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2608.09867

    Researchers steal proprietary LLM inference chains via cross-model compatibility of encrypted inference blocks

    利用加密思维块的跨模型重放，诱导弱模型逐字转写专有推理链

    arXiv
    2608.09867
    Published
    Layer
    Prompt layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.8, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Haiku 4.5 and others13

    Abstract论文揭示了客户端加密思维块跨模型互换漏洞，提出了低成本提取方法并给出防御方案。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2603.17239

    LAAF: A Systematic Red-Teaming Method and Automated Attack Framework for LPCI Vulnerabilities in Agentic LLM Systems

    提出 LAAF，分阶段自动攻击智能体系统的 LPCI 漏洞

    arXiv
    2603.17239
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gemini-2.0-flash-001, claude-3-haiku-20240307, meta-llama/llama-3.1-70b-instruct and others5
    AbstractLAAF does LPCI red teaming with taxonomy plus stage seeding.

    The authors state that LAAF is an automated red-teaming framework built specifically for LPCI in agentic LLMs. The issue to address is that encoded, delayed, and conditionally triggered payloads can persist in memory or RAG and re-enter across sessions, whereas Garak and PyRIT do not use the previous round's breakthrough results to seed the next stage across the six stages.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. AttacksarXiv 2602.18514

    招聘中的特洛伊木马：标准模型与推理模型间接提示注入的红队测试案例研究

    用简历中的不可见指令做间接提示注入，操纵招聘推荐

    arXiv
    2602.18514
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    LLM applications
    Evaluated models
    Qwen 3 30B A3B Instruct 2507, Qwen 3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

    Abstract作者称推理在简单注入下会帮攻击圆谎，在不合逻辑的复杂注入下又会把欺骗漏出来。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. AttacksarXiv 2507.10457

    论文提出 LPCI：针对 Agent 逻辑层与持久记忆的提示控制注入攻击

    提出 LPCI，把延迟条件载荷写入记忆与检索库以跨会话触发

    arXiv
    2507.10457
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    ChatGPT, Claude, LLaMA3 and others8
    Abstract作者定义 LPCI。

    作者把LPCI定义为针对智能体逻辑执行、记忆留存和工具集成的跨阶段漏洞类，而不是单次输入上的提示改写。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end