Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 20 papers

Another 219papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.11932

    A Fudan team measures the citation fragility of AI search: ordinary posts can enter citations and answer text

    Measures citation fragility in AI search, demonstrating that ordinary public posts can enter citations and answers.

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Grok, Doubao, ChatGPT and others10

    AbstractThe authors claim the paper quantifies vulnerabilities in AI search caused by citation preferences and low posting thresholds; tests show public web posts can penetrate AI citations, and they call for auditing the citation supply chain.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. DefensesarXiv 2610.02861

    论文提出在 Kubernetes 上保护 AI Agent 的七层纵深防御框架与参考架构

    提出 Kubernetes 运维智能体的七层纵深防御框架与参考架构

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Abstract把运维智能体当不可信租户,用七层控制在完全攻破假设下约束行动。

    把 Kubernetes 上的运维智能体当作不可信租户,在假定提示注入已完全控制其工具选择的前提下,用基础设施重建数据面与控制面的边界。要解决的是:智能体读日志、注解、工单或 MCP 工具描述时,这些内容可以变成它带着自身凭据执行的命令。模型对齐和分类器只降低概率。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. EvoRiskBench: An evolutionary benchmark for runtime security risks of workspace agents

    构建 EvoRiskBench 评测工作区 Agent 的运行时安全风险

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.6 Sol, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813, Claude Opus 5

    Abstract论文构建了工作空间智能体运行时风险基准 EvoRiskBench,发现高执行力智能体在 IPI 下面临较高安全风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2609.02774

    CodePoisonRAG:针对检索增强代码生成的知识投毒攻击

    提出 CodePoisonRAG,对检索增强代码生成的知识库投毒以植入漏洞

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen 3.5 9B, Code Llama 13B, DeepSeek-Coder-V2 16B

    AbstractCodePoisonRAG 展示了 RACG 外部知识库的新攻击面,在较低投毒率下可定向诱发指定漏洞并部分抵御防御。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. Counter-GEO-Bench:现有护栏难挡 GEO 虚假信息

    构建 COUNTER-GEO-BENCH,评测生成式搜索中的 GEO 虚假信息防御

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Gemma-4-31B-IT, Qwen-3.5-35B-A3B, Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E and others8

    Abstract论文构建了针对 GEO 虚假信息的首个防御基准,揭示通用护栏的失效与反作用,并提出了有效的轻量对比检测基线。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. DefensesarXiv 2609.29647

    AgentKernel:面向 Agent 的可信原生操作系统内核

    提出 AgentKernel,用四支柱强制中介 Agent 的输入、工具与记忆

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractAgentKernel 是四支柱智能体 OS 设计,安全论证未附带实测数字。

    AgentKernel 是把安全做成组织原则的智能体 OS 架构,不是带跑分的攻防评测。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2608.04565

    Researchers propose Breadcrumbing long-range attack that can hijack the evidence chain of DeepResearch-style search agents

    提出权威链劫持与轨迹引导策略演化,劫持搜索 Agent 的证据链

    Published
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3.5-9B, Gemma4-31B, DeepResearch and others7

    Abstract论文揭示了多步搜索智能体在受限中间人操纵下的脆弱性,提出 ACH 策略与 TGSE 演化方法并完成系统验证。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. 论文评测 Claude Code 与 Codex 记忆文件中的提示注入风险

    评测编码 Agent 记忆文件中提示注入的跨会话影响

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Claude Haiku 4.5, Claude Opus 4.7, GPT-5.2 and others4
    Abstract已植入记忆文件的载荷可以跨会话影响 Claude Code 与 Codex,攻击成功与载荷是否留下是两种不同的失败。

    Bad Memory 在沙箱合成工作区里评测文件型持久记忆上的提示注入,比较载荷能否改变当前会话,以及能否在后续会话中留下或叠加。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. AttacksarXiv 2606.04329

    研究者系统研究 LLM 智能体记忆投毒攻击并提出 MPBench 基准

    系统研究 LLM 智能体记忆投毒并构建基准 MPBench

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct, Deberta-v3-base, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and others5

    Abstract系统研究了智能体记忆投毒风险,揭示了写入渠道漏洞,构建了 MPBench 基准并指出提示注入防御的局限。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. AttacksarXiv 2605.15338

    Hidden in Memory: Latent Memory Poisoning of LLM Agents

    提出潜伏记忆投毒,诱导 Agent 把外部文档写成持久伪造记忆

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.4, GPT-5.5, Claude Sonnet 4.6 and others12
    Abstract持久记忆成为跨会话攻击面:通用载荷可写入伪造记忆,并在相关后续任务中影响行为。

    sleeper memory poisoning 研究带持久记忆的 LLM 助手:外部文档能否让助手存下一则伪造的用户记忆,并在原文档消失后的新会话里被取回、用来改变回复或动作。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. AttacksarXiv 2605.11047

    DeepTrap 框架在 OpenClaw 上自动挖掘智能体执行上下文漏洞

    提出 DEEPTRAP 以搜索可诱导不安全轨迹的执行上下文载荷

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.4, Claude Sonnet 4.6, GLM-5 and others9
    AbstractDEEPTRAP 用轨迹级搜索发现 OpenClaw 上下文风险,作者称不能只看最终回复。

    DEEPTRAP 是针对 OpenClaw 的自动化红队框架,搜索执行前被改写的文件、记忆、技能、工具元数据或配置,而不是改用户指令。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  12. 论文提出 eTAMP 攻击:网页内容注入可跨会话污染 Web Agent 记忆

    提出 eTAMP,用网页内容跨会话投毒 Web Agent 轨迹记忆并诱导越权操作

    Published
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5-mini, GPT-5.2, GPT-OSS-120B and others6
    Abstract论文提出了基于环境注入的跨任务记忆投毒攻击 eTAMP,作者报告智能体在环境压力下易感性增加且能力与安全并不协同。

    该论文评估了基于大语言模型的 Web 智能体在利用历史交互轨迹进行记忆增强时的安全脆弱性。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  13. DefensesarXiv 2603.12644

    Revealing security threats and defense architectures for autonomous agents: an OpenClaw case study

    Reviews threats to autonomous agents and proposes a full-lifecycle defense blueprint, FASA

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractUsing OpenClaw as an example, it divides risks into three layers and uses FASA to describe defense from input to system execution.

    This is a threat review and defense architecture report using OpenClaw as a case study, not a scored attack or defense evaluation.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  14. DefensesarXiv 2603.11619

    Taming OpenClaw: Security Analysis and Mitigation of Threats in Autonomous LLM Agents

    Proposes a defense-in-depth aligned with the five stages to mitigate cross-stage threats to autonomous agents

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractThis is a lifecycle threat analysis and layered mitigation design for OpenClaw, with the cases serving as qualitative evidence.

    This is a lifecycle threat analysis of OpenClaw, accompanied by a set of layered mitigation designs. The problem addressed is: when autonomous agents connect instant messaging, persistent memory, third-party plugins, and high-privilege execution, attacks are no longer limited to single-turn jailbreaks but can compound across multiple stages from initialization to execution. The authors argue that defenses hardening only individual interfaces cannot stop such cross-temporal attacks.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end