Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.
Oct 12 · Monday
Another 262 papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
“
About this collection Collection in progress We are building a large AI safety paper collection to help researchers find work related to their interests. Papers are collected automatically andfiltered only for relevance to AI safety , without judging quality, novelty or reading value. The default “Annotated first” shows papers with tags or published paper analyses first. Each group is ordered by original publication date, newest first, with undated papers last. “Newest first” uses publication dates only. This order is not a quality ranking.
One-line summaries, tags and paper analyses are prepared by AI from the papers. Language models may have systematic biases and produce hallucinations.We plan to carry out human annotation and review to reduce errors in this content.
评测文本守卫与激活探针能否拦住机器人隐含伤害指令
Published Oct 5
Evaluated models π0.5 , OpenVLA-OFT , Llama Guard 3 and others10 审计机器人安全监控的细化缺口,比较表面计划与图细化轨迹的裁决
Published Oct 2 Abstract 表面轨迹可漏掉图诱导的禁区进入。作者审计 RoboGuard 的一个假设:对高层动作轨迹的安全裁决,在补上语义图诱导的导航和已记录隐式效应之后是否仍然成立。做法是不改验证器,并固定同一条 LTL。
提出 S³,用 guard agent 编排阶段安全技能防御智能体多阶段风险
Published Aug 3
Evaluated models DeepSeek-V4-Pro , DeepSeek-V4-Flash You have reached the end