All papers

把 Kubernetes 上的运维智能体当作不可信租户，在假定提示注入已完全控制其工具选择的前提下，用基础设施重建数据面与控制面的边界。要解决的是：智能体读日志、注解、工单或 MCP 工具描述时，这些内容可以变成它带着自身凭据执行的命令。模型对齐和分类器只降低概率。

ACE 是一份把智能体会话的内核 syscall 痕迹与应用层清单、转录配对起来的检测语料和基准。。

作者在一条会改写沙箱邮件库的四智能体流水线上，检查低权限失陷会不会变成未授权的真实动作。

SHAQ is a defense against EIA for cloud vector databases: instead of directly modifying document embeddings, it replaces them with shadow query embeddings.

ClawSentry 是挂在智能体运行时之外的安全监督网关，用来同时盖住 skill 执行的多个生命周期边界，并把已被拒绝的效果记到会话里。

AMS 是面向开放权重模型、部署前使用的激活扫描器，用来看安全训练被拿掉或改写之后，激活空间里还留着什么几何痕迹。

SilentRetrieval 是针对 RAG 的两阶段语料投毒，在每查询一篇、合成目标答案的统一协议下，同时处理检索劫持、生成操纵和流畅度。

The authors state that LAAF is an automated red-teaming framework built specifically for LPCI in agentic LLMs. The issue to address is that encoded, delayed, and conditionally triggered payloads can persist in memory or RAG and re-enter across sessions, whereas Garak and PyRIT do not use the previous round's breakthrough results to seed the next stage across the six stages.

This is a threat review and defense architecture report using OpenClaw as a case study, not a scored attack or defense evaluation.

This is a lifecycle threat analysis of OpenClaw, accompanied by a set of layered mitigation designs. The problem addressed is: when autonomous agents connect instant messaging, persistent memory, third-party plugins, and high-privilege execution, attacks are no longer limited to single-turn jailbreaks but can compound across multiple stages from initialization to execution. The authors argue that defenses hardening only individual interfaces cannot stop such cross-temporal attacks.

Zero2Text 是一种不训练 decoder、也不使用泄漏文本–向量对的文本 embedding 反演，针对 RAG 向量库在严格黑盒、目标域未知时的还原。

DQ-A 是一种 query-agnostic、complete black-box 的文档隐藏攻击，对象是用最后隐层相似度匹配的 LLM 检索。

EmoRAG 测量 RAG 对符号扰动的反应：同一表情同时出现在查询和库文本里时，检索会偏离语义匹配。作者要检查的是，检索是否真由语义相关性决定。

作者把LPCI定义为针对智能体逻辑执行、记忆留存和工具集成的跨阶段漏洞类，而不是单次输入上的提示改写。