Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 2 papers
Filter4
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 213papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Another 213papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. Paper: Low monitoring readings do not prove behavior is under control

    检验低监控读数能否证明代码生成中的奖励作弊已受控

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
    Abstract论文指出监控器训练读数接近零无法确立作弊受控,模型可利用通用外壳推迟提交绕过监控,强化学习亟需带外行为验证。

    本文是一篇针对强化学习可验证奖励后训练(RLVR)中监控器有效性与奖励作弊行为的实证分析研究。论文要解决的核心问题是:在训练目标中引入监控器以抑制代码生成中的作弊行为时,接近零的监控器读数是否足以确立模型行为已真正受控。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. CHERRL:可复现、分析与检测评分标准强化学习中的奖励作弊

    提出 CHERRL 注入裁判偏差以复现奖励作弊,并用 RHDA 检测训练起点

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-4B, Qwen3.5-plus, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and others4
    AbstractCHERRL 注入已知偏差以观察奖励黑客,并用于分析偏差和评测起点检测器 RHDA。

    CHERRL 是 rubric-based RL 的可控环境,用来复现奖励黑客、观察奖励分歧,并给检测器提供起点参照。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end