Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 9 papers

Another 232papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.07510

    PersistBD: attackers can strengthen backdoors before release so that they maintain high attack success rates even after developer SFT and RL.

    提出 PERSISTBD,发布前强化供应链后门使其经良性 SFT 与 RL 后仍外发凭据

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-Coder-3B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct, Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
    Abstract总结了论文关于后门在 SFT/RL 中存活的发现、两因子机制、PERSISTBD 方法与核心数字。

    本文研究第三方 LLM 智能体在开发者进行良性监督微调(SFT)和强化学习(RL)后训练时的后门持久性风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. DefensesarXiv 2610.02861

    论文提出在 Kubernetes 上保护 AI Agent 的七层纵深防御框架与参考架构

    提出 Kubernetes 运维智能体的七层纵深防御框架与参考架构

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Abstract把运维智能体当不可信租户,用七层控制在完全攻破假设下约束行动。

    把 Kubernetes 上的运维智能体当作不可信租户,在假定提示注入已完全控制其工具选择的前提下,用基础设施重建数据面与控制面的边界。要解决的是:智能体读日志、注解、工单或 MCP 工具描述时,这些内容可以变成它带着自身凭据执行的命令。模型对齐和分类器只降低概率。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AttacksarXiv 2609.37468

    论文提出针对 Agentic RAG 的检索器后门攻击与 DOU 隐藏方法

    提出检索器后门攻击操纵智能体搜索,并用 DOU 逃避检测

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    E5, Contriever-MSMARCO

    Abstract论文展示了通过恶意检索器操纵智能体多轮搜索并利用诱饵重塑表征隐蔽后门的可行性与系统风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2609.14060

    AgentQ:针对 LLM Agent 的量化条件后门攻击

    提出量化条件后门 AGENTQ,使智能体仅在量化后触发恶意工具调用

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3.5-2B, Qwen3.5-4B, Qwen3.5-9B and others6

    Abstract论文研究了智能体量化条件后门风险,提出 AGENTQ 在保持效用的同时实现全精度隐蔽与量化后生效。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2609.07051

    TrojanWorld:通过想象引导对世界模型智能体植入后门

    提出 TrojanWorld,用物理触发器对世界模型智能体植入想象引导后门

    Published
    Evaluated models
    TD-MPC2, DreamerV3, R2-Dreamer

    AbstractTrojanWorld 揭示了世界模型智能体的供应链后门风险,通过在世界模型中操纵想象可实现对闭环动作的持续控制。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2608.06862

    SynChain:诱导计算机使用 Agent 自建攻击链并跨任务持久化

    提出 SYNCHAIN,诱导计算机使用 Agent 自建跨任务持久攻击链

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3.5-9B, Llama-3.1-8B, Ministral-3-8B

    Abstract论文揭示了 CUA 自合成工件带来的内部供应链威胁,验证了潜伏载荷的跨任务传播能力与防御局限。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2604.03890

    From prompts to physical actions: structured backdoor attacks against LLM-mediated robot control systems

    Propose a structured JSON backdoor that triggers malicious actions in robot control via a poisoned LoRA

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Gemma-2-9B-IT, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B and others4

    Abstract推理层后门传不到执行。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. DefensesarXiv 2603.12644

    Revealing security threats and defense architectures for autonomous agents: an OpenClaw case study

    Reviews threats to autonomous agents and proposes a full-lifecycle defense blueprint, FASA

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractUsing OpenClaw as an example, it divides risks into three layers and uses FASA to describe defense from input to system execution.

    This is a threat review and defense architecture report using OpenClaw as a case study, not a scored attack or defense evaluation.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. DefensesarXiv 2603.11619

    Taming OpenClaw: Security Analysis and Mitigation of Threats in Autonomous LLM Agents

    Proposes a defense-in-depth aligned with the five stages to mitigate cross-stage threats to autonomous agents

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractThis is a lifecycle threat analysis and layered mitigation design for OpenClaw, with the cases serving as qualitative evidence.

    This is a lifecycle threat analysis of OpenClaw, accompanied by a set of layered mitigation designs. The problem addressed is: when autonomous agents connect instant messaging, persistent memory, third-party plugins, and high-privilege execution, attacks are no longer limited to single-turn jailbreaks but can compound across multiple stages from initialization to execution. The authors argue that defenses hardening only individual interfaces cannot stop such cross-temporal attacks.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end