Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 24 papers

Another 232papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.12292

    The paper proposes an option channel attack: changing one option label can make an agent guardrail allow a prohibited operation

    Proposing an option channel attack that renames option labels so that agent guardrails allow prohibited operations

    Published
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    LAYA-TD, LAYA-EN, LAYA-ML and others5

    AbstractThe authors' evaluation indicates that typed models should not serve as final safety arbiters; they are susceptible to off-policy text and option name manipulation, and confidence filtering cannot resist attacks.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. DefensesarXiv 2610.07657

    DEFER1 多智能体防御研究报告受控测试中的攻击成功率下降

    实现 DEFER,以确定性检查优先拦截多智能体流水线的内容攻击

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507, gpt-oss-120b, Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct and others5
    AbstractDEFER 把确定性检查放在 judge 之前。

    DEFER 用来测量多智能体授权流水线里,确定性规则在何处结束、LLM judge 从何处开始。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. DefensesarXiv 2610.03073

    SecJev:为 System One 决策模型引入安全专业知识

    提出 SecJev,用场景加权训练把决策模型适配为安全类型化判断

    Published
    Evaluated models
    SecJev-0.8B, SecJev-2B, SecJev-4B and others4
    AbstractSecJev 用共享打分器做安全决策,0.8B 的 task-macro 超过 Kev-9B。

    SecJev 是 0.8B 到 9B 的安全决策模型族,作者称据其所知是首个面向安全的 Jev-like 家族。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. Study retests 15 prompt injection detectors: benchmark scores poorly predict agent deployment performance

    重测提示注入检测器在 Agent 工具输出上的检出与任务阻断

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Horizon-Labs, Wolf Defender, Prismor-1.5B and others15

    Abstract论文揭示公开基准无法反映智能体检测器表现,检测能力源于输入格式相似而非通用防御,建议基于工具输出与低误报评测。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. Agentic Commerce Bench:衡量会花钱的智能体的欺诈检测能力

    构建支付欺诈基准 ACB,评测花钱智能体的欺诈检测

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gordonguard, pattern judge
    AbstractACB 把支付欺诈与智能体操纵分开测量,作者强调观察权限、误报预算和微支付复核成本。

    ACB 是一套智能体支付欺诈基准与检测参考栈,目标是衡量钱是否被不当提取,而不仅是智能体是否接受了恶意指令。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. DefensesarXiv 2609.33039

    TACIT: detecting agent trajectory harm from LLM internal states

    提出 TACIT,从冻结内部状态检测智能体有害轨迹

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-4B, Llama-3.1-8B, Qwen3-4B-Instruct and others4

    Abstract提出基于内部表征的智能体轨迹安全检测方法 TACIT,揭示工具风险表征特性并在多项基准上提升检测表现与效率。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. DefensesarXiv 2609.30657

    研究者提出面向邮件 Agent 的攻击链建模提示注入检测框架

    提出面向邮件 Agent 的攻击链提示注入检测框架

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Proposed framework
    Abstract攻击链与动作一致性融合改善了严格检测的平均 F1,但迁移、误报和攻击召回仍需分别看。

    这是一项邮件智能体提示注入防御的离线建模与评测研究:作者把攻击文本是否恶意、攻击是否推进到工具操作、最终参数是否达标分开处理。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. Jev 被用于零样本检测十类对齐失败,中位 AUROC 达 0.886

    提出 RLCDAlignBench,零样本检测多种对齐失败

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Jev (jev-1.13.0)
    Abstract一次通用问题已能给多数对齐失败排序,大的误差来自状态和标签。

    RLCDAlignBench 测量用强化学习做校准决策的 Jev,能否当作对齐失败的零样本检测器。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. AttacksarXiv 2609.22510

    特拉维夫大学提出爆炸性提示词:条件触发的间接提示注入可绕过九款生产 Agent

    提出条件触发的爆炸提示词,并设计摄入期检测器 DeFuse

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct and others15
    Abstract论文揭示了条件触发使提示注入绕过防御并在触发时执行工具,提出轻量检测器并在摄入期有效防范。

    论文针对大语言模型智能体面临的间接提示注入威胁,研究了利用条件句式实现时间分离的爆炸提示词。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. DefensesarXiv 2609.13601

    Mind the Gap:检测 DAO 治理中的描述-执行不匹配攻击

    提出 DEMI 检测框架,用生命周期模拟和证据映射发现 DAO 提案错配

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, GPT-4.1 and others9
    Abstract作者把 DAO 错配检测做成执行前审计层,主张逐动作证据映射与风险复核是关键。

    这是面向 DAO 治理的执行前错配检测研究:攻击者可以提交看似合理的描述,但让获批载荷执行另一种行为,投票描述并不直接约束代码。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. DefensesarXiv 2608.06422

    CMU 研究:分片判断可避免 LLM 监督失效并抵御对抗利用

    提出分片监督,将评判标准分配给独立调用以抵御展示攻击

    Published
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.8, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.6 and others4
    Abstract论文揭示决策负载是大模型监督的独立瓶颈,提出分片与辩论机制有效分离注意力与平衡证据,在多项高难度基准上实现稳健评判。

    本文系统研究了大语言模型在执行多标准监督与评判时的决策负载瓶颈及其安全风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  12. AttacksarXiv 2606.13044

    研究者提出对抗性重新包装:不改科学内容仅调整表述即可拉高 AI 审稿分数

    提出对抗重构,仅改表述以拉高 AI 审稿分数

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Claude Sonnet 4, Claude Sonnet 4.5, GPT-5-mini

    Abstract揭示 AI 审稿系统易受纯表述重构操纵,建议在部署前解耦科学与写作评价。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  13. AttacksarXiv 2604.03890

    From prompts to physical actions: structured backdoor attacks against LLM-mediated robot control systems

    Propose a structured JSON backdoor that triggers malicious actions in robot control via a poisoned LoRA

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Gemma-2-9B-IT, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B and others4

    Abstract推理层后门传不到执行。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  14. DefensesarXiv 2603.14707

    Visual Confusion Agents: Exploiting and Defending Against Perception Failures in Computer-Use Agents

    Proposes out-of-process dual-channel comparison classification to intercept erroneous clicks by computer-use agents

    Published
    Evaluated models
    multi-modal-embed-small
    AbstractPerception errors can be exploited by swapping screen pixels.

    The authors frame CUA's perception failure as a security vulnerability, visual confused deputy: the agent authorizes click(x,y) based on a misread screen, and the actual landing point differs from the element it believes it is clicking.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  15. DefensesarXiv 2603.04474

    From Spark to Wildfire: Modeling and Mitigating Error Cascades in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Collaboration

    Proposing a lineage-graph governance layer to suppress error cascades in multi-agent collaboration

    Published
    AbstractA single seed can solidify into a false consensus along a fixed collaboration graph.

    The authors turn "small errors becoming collective false consensus" in LLM-MAS into a measurable propagation on a graph, and use a plug-in that only changes messages, not topology, to reduce the final infection.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  16. AttacksarXiv 2602.01658

    Efficient Adversarial Attacks on High-Dimensional Offline Bandits

    提出三类攻击,训练前扰动奖励模型以劫持离线 bandit

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Image Reward, Aesthetic Model
    Abstract公开奖励权重可被小扰动劫持离线 bandit,打乱日志只部分缓解。

    作者研究离线 bandit 在奖励模型被事先改权重时,还会不会选出最优臂。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  17. AttacksarXiv 2601.21360

    Compliance Paradox: Semantic-Instruction Decoupling in Automated Academic Code Evaluation

    提出 AST-ASIP ,把对抗指令植入编译器忽略区域以劫持代码评分

    Published
    Evaluated models
    DeepSeek-V3.2, Qwen3-235B, GPT-OSS-120B and others9
    Abstract作者称 RLHF 的服从性使评分脱离代码。

    这篇工作把自动代码评分中的失败称为 Compliance Paradox:评分模型可以离开提交逻辑,转而执行嵌在可编译代码里的隐藏指令。

    Paper analysisRead analysis