Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 4 papers
Filter4
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 232papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Another 232papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. Study retests 15 prompt injection detectors: benchmark scores poorly predict agent deployment performance

    重测提示注入检测器在 Agent 工具输出上的检出与任务阻断

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Horizon-Labs, Wolf Defender, Prismor-1.5B and others15

    Abstract论文揭示公开基准无法反映智能体检测器表现,检测能力源于输入格式相似而非通用防御,建议基于工具输出与低误报评测。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. PIDS-Bench:在过度防御、混淆与分布偏移下评测提示注入检测器

    提出 PIDS-Bench,评测提示注入检测器在过度防御与分布偏移下的表现

    Published
    Evaluated models
    TF-IDF + logistic regression, DistilBERT, DeBERTa-v3-FT and others7
    AbstractPIDS-Bench 显示高分布内 F1 仍会过度拦截外部来源的安全相关良性输入。

    PIDS-Bench 是一个冻结的检测器级基准,用来在固定阈值下同时看提示注入检测和良性误报。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. BioSecBench-Refusal:面向智能体生物安全风险评估的配对基准

    提出 BioSecBench-Refusal,评测智能体生物研发拒答与隐蔽危害识别

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Opus 4.8, Opus 4.7, Opus 4.6 and others10
    Abstract配对基准显示拒绝多由 API 触发,合法任务常被拒得不少于隐蔽危害。

    BioSecBench-Refusal 把生物研发智能体的谨慎程度和识别隐蔽危害的能力放在同一套任务上测量。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end