Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.
Oct 12 · Monday
Another 261 papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
“
About this collection Collection in progress We are building a large AI safety paper collection to help researchers find work related to their interests. Papers are collected automatically andfiltered only for relevance to AI safety , without judging quality, novelty or reading value. The default “Annotated first” shows papers with tags or published paper analyses first. Each group is ordered by original publication date, newest first, with undated papers last. “Newest first” uses publication dates only. This order is not a quality ranking.
One-line summaries, tags and paper analyses are prepared by AI from the papers. Language models may have systematic biases and produce hallucinations.We plan to carry out human annotation and review to reduce errors in this content.
测量 LLM 版本更替对科学摘要 AI 改写检测器的影响
Published Oct 8
Evaluated models RoBERTa-base , Pangram Abstract 作者称检测器的基准准确率只是临时的，每次发布都要连同更早版本重验。作者量化的是：科学摘要的 AI 改写筛查，在 LLM 版本不断更换、而人类摘要误标必须少见时，会怎样变。问题来自期刊和会议已经按分数阈值筛查投稿，但基准多停在评估时可得的版本上。
重测提示注入检测器在 Agent 工具输出上的检出与任务阻断
Published Oct 2
Evaluated models Horizon-Labs , Wolf Defender , Prismor-1.5B and others15 Abstract 论文揭示公开基准无法反映智能体检测器表现，检测能力源于输入格式相似而非通用防御，建议基于工具输出与低误报评测。
提出 PIDS-Bench，评测提示注入检测器在过度防御与分布偏移下的表现
Published Sep 14
Evaluated models TF-IDF + logistic regression , DistilBERT , DeBERTa-v3-FT and others7 Abstract PIDS-Bench 显示高分布内 F1 仍会过度拦截外部来源的安全相关良性输入。PIDS-Bench 是一个冻结的检测器级基准，用来在固定阈值下同时看提示注入检测和良性误报。
提出 BioSecBench-Refusal，评测智能体生物研发拒答与隐蔽危害识别
Published Jul 6
Evaluated models Opus 4.8 , Opus 4.7 , Opus 4.6 and others10 Abstract 配对基准显示拒绝多由 API 触发，合法任务常被拒得不少于隐蔽危害。BioSecBench-Refusal 把生物研发智能体的谨慎程度和识别隐蔽危害的能力放在同一套任务上测量。
提出针对 Agent 护栏的推理扩展拒绝服务攻击
Published Jun 12
Evaluated models TS-Guard-8B , Qwen3.5-9B , DeepSeek-V3.2 and others11 You have reached the end