Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 50 papers
Filter4

Attack type

Jailbreaks3Prompt injection9Poisoning and backdoors22Detection evasion6

Attack technique

Gradient and representation optimization29Automated search11Multi-turn escalation5Encoding and obfuscation15Cross-modal payloads51Defense-targeted8Dormant triggers22

Impact

Harmful content10Unauthorized actions7Data and privacy leaks3Output manipulation27Availability and reliability3

System type

Models and APIs33LLM applications3AI Agent15coding agent3web agent4Embodied systems and robotics6

Attacker access

Black-box4White-box4

Attack surface / entry point

User input8Web pages and interfaces4Images, audio and video29Training data12Weights and gradients15Distribution channels11

Layer

Prompt layer20Application layer10Training and data layer18

System component

MCP and skills8Memory25RAG9Guardrails and judges8Reasoning chains4Permissions and sandboxing3Fine-tuning and open weights22Vision29Audio6Embeddings4Multimodal39
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 232papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Attack technique：Gradient and representation optimizationAttack technique：Dormant triggersSystem component：Fine-tuning and open weightsSystem component：VisionClear all

Another 232papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.12644

    Cancerous backdoor attack: progressive activation via invisible tokens and a stage controller.

    Proposes the Cancerous backdoor, which progressively corrupts reasoning using invisible stage tokens.

    arXiv
    2610.12644
    Published
    Layer
    Training and data layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3
    AbstractHidden tokens plus a stage controller make the backdoor progressively corrupt reasoning upon triggering, and the authors believe that looking only at the answer will miss it.

    Cancerous Backdoor Attack changes LLM backdoors from one-time activation to multi-stage reasoning corruption that accumulates progressively with triggers.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2610.09819

    FAB 攻击：给 HuBERT/WavLM 植入后门，背景警笛声即可让下游语音任务失灵

    提出 FAB 攻击，向声学基础模型植入可由环境声触发的后门

    arXiv
    2610.09819
    Published
    Layer
    Training and data layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    HuBERT-base, WavLM-base

    Abstract论文提出了针对声学基模的 FAB 后门攻击，在弱威胁模型下实现了任务无关、物理可触发的后门植入。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2610.09240

    WebMirage hijacks visual web agents' browser operations with adversarial images

    提出 WebMirage，用局部对抗图像劫持视觉网页 Agent 的浏览器操作

    arXiv
    2610.09240
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    LLaVA-v1.5-13B, LLaVA-v1.6-34B, MiniCPM-o-8B and others6
    Abstract论文提出了针对网络智能体的端到端视觉红队框架 WebMirage，揭示了从视觉定位到浏览器执行的安全脆弱性。

    WebMirage 是一个面向视觉定位网络智能体的流水线感知端到端红队攻击框架。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2610.09027

    P-VMI：对抗图像经 KV cache 持续影响多轮对话

    提出持久视觉记忆注入，使对抗图像经缓存在触发时操控输出

    arXiv
    2610.09027
    Published
    Layer
    Infrastructure layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-8B, Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct, Gemma-4-12B

    Abstract论文提出 P-VMI，证实对抗输入被掩蔽后仍可经 KV 缓存持久控制模型，强调了保留状态的安全风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2610.07723

    Researchers propose answer-side backdoors: letting the model self-generate trigger words to bypass safety refusals.

    提出回答端后门，让模型自生成触发词以在干净有害请求下绕过拒答

    arXiv
    2610.07723
    Published
    Layer
    Training and data layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    Llama-2-7B-chat-hf, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3, Gemma-7B-it and others4

    Abstract论文提出了多轮对话中回答端自生成触发词绕过安全拒绝的后门攻击，指出输入端防护存在盲区。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2610.07654

    研究揭示策略蒸馏的安全后门风险

    测量带后门教师经 OPD 向干净学生迁移潜伏后门

    arXiv
    2610.07654
    Published
    Layer
    Training and data layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct
    Abstract作者称 OPD 可在压低无触发词有害率时迁入后门。

    带后门的外部教师经 OPD，可在压低无触发词有害率的同时，把触发条件下的有害行为传给初始干净学生。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. AttacksarXiv 2610.07510

    PersistBD: attackers can strengthen backdoors before release so that they maintain high attack success rates even after developer SFT and RL.

    提出 PERSISTBD，发布前强化供应链后门使其经良性 SFT 与 RL 后仍外发凭据

    arXiv
    2610.07510
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-Coder-3B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct, Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
    Abstract总结了论文关于后门在 SFT/RL 中存活的发现、两因子机制、PERSISTBD 方法与核心数字。

    本文研究第三方 LLM 智能体在开发者进行良性监督微调（SFT）和强化学习（RL）后训练时的后门持久性风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. AttacksarXiv 2610.05793

    研究者训练出按多智能体拓扑触发的代码后门模型

    提出拓扑条件后门，使代码模型在推断多智能体部署时植入漏洞

    arXiv
    2610.05793
    Published
    Layer
    Training and data layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct

    Abstract论文证实了拓扑条件后门的可训练性与泛化性，展示了常规评测盲区，并提出差异化拓扑审计作为检测防御方向。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. AttacksarXiv 2610.05453

    研究者提出 Privacy-Leaking Watermarks，可在本地多模态模型中泄露对话隐私

    提出 PLW，用微调把先前对话敏感触发编码进后续生成图像

    arXiv
    2610.05453
    Published
    Layer
    Training and data layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    OmniGen2, BAGEL-7B

    AbstractPLW 把先前对话线索写成后续图像中的隐水印，检出随触发、模型和间隔变化。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  13. AttacksarXiv 2610.01367

    研究：高质量数据筛选挡不住投毒

    提出 Bi-QSTO，优化能穿过质量筛选并在微调中削弱安全对齐的投毒样本

    arXiv
    2610.01367
    Published
    Layer
    Training and data layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    Llama2-7B-Chat, Llama3-8B-Instruct, Qwen2-7B-Instruct and others5
    Abstract质量筛选挡不住部分高分样本的安全削弱。

    Bi-QSTO 研究一个实际训练缺口：基于质量的数据选择会先于微调决定样本去留，而以往微调投毒多假设毒样本直接进入训练集。已对齐 LLM 的拒答会被少量有害或看似无害的微调样本削弱。作者用三个问题串起实验：选择能否排除毒样本。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  15. AttacksarXiv 2609.33985

    研究：众包微调数据投毒可放大专有指令抽取

    提出主题锚点投毒，放大众包微调后的专有指令提取

    arXiv
    2609.33985
    Published
    Layer
    Training and data layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and others4

    Abstract论文提出基于主题锚点的数据中毒攻击，证明低比例的中毒样本可在黑盒条件下隐蔽放大微调指令泄漏。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  16. AttacksarXiv 2609.37468

    论文提出针对 Agentic RAG 的检索器后门攻击与 DOU 隐藏方法

    提出检索器后门攻击操纵智能体搜索，并用 DOU 逃避检测

    arXiv
    2609.37468
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    E5, Contriever-MSMARCO

    Abstract论文展示了通过恶意检索器操纵智能体多轮搜索并利用诱饵重塑表征隐蔽后门的可行性与系统风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  17. AttacksarXiv 2609.27422

    RAMP：逆转对抗扰动以增强针对恶意软件检测器的干净标签后门攻击

    提出 RAMP，逆转对抗扰动加强恶意软件检测器的干净标签后门

    arXiv
    2609.27422
    Published
    Layer
    Training and data layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    MalConv, MalConvGCG
    AbstractRAMP 用反转扰动做 clean-label 投毒。

    RAMP 是 score-based black-box 下的 clean-label 后门增强，对象是会微调的 Windows PE 原始字节恶意软件检测器。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  18. AttacksarXiv 2609.14060

    AgentQ：针对 LLM Agent 的量化条件后门攻击

    提出量化条件后门 AGENTQ，使智能体仅在量化后触发恶意工具调用

    arXiv
    2609.14060
    Published
    Layer
    Training and data layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3.5-2B, Qwen3.5-4B, Qwen3.5-9B and others6

    Abstract论文研究了智能体量化条件后门风险，提出 AGENTQ 在保持效用的同时实现全精度隐蔽与量化后生效。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  20. AttacksarXiv 2609.07051

    TrojanWorld：通过想象引导对世界模型智能体植入后门

    提出 TrojanWorld，用物理触发器对世界模型智能体植入想象引导后门

    arXiv
    2609.07051
    Published
    Layer
    Training and data layer
    Setting
    Embodied systems and robotics
    Evaluated models
    TD-MPC2, DreamerV3, R2-Dreamer

    AbstractTrojanWorld 揭示了世界模型智能体的供应链后门风险，通过在世界模型中操纵想象可实现对闭环动作的持续控制。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
Load more